Author Topic: "Cause of Destruction of WTC Discovered" (Read 7049 times)

gladius_veritatis · « **on:** August 24, 2009, 03:06:37 AM »

http://futurefastforward.com/feature-articles/2391

Cause Of Destruction Of WTC Discovered - By David Scrimshaw (20/8/09)
David Scrimshaw
Thursday, 20 August 2009 13:00

NewsChief.com

As disturbing as 9/11 was, the peer-reviewed paper of Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen is causing shockwaves around the world.

In the paper, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, Open Chemical Physics Journal, Vol. 2 (2009)," Dr. Harrit and eight other scientists from Denmark, the United States and Australia report the actual cause of the destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 in New York almost eight years ago.

Nano-thermite, a mixture of aluminum and rust powder, reacts to intense heat of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, producing molten iron and an effective explosion. It can be used as rocket fuel and contains more energy than dynamite. Over 10 tons have been estimated to have been found in Manhattan near the site. While thermite can be bought by anyone for welding (which produces iron), the nano process is performed by and for military uses only.

In an interview with Germany's gulli.com, Dr. Harrit was asked how the substance could have been placed in the towers. Mark Loizeaux, an expert on demolition and whose company was assigned the cleanup of Ground Zero, has claimed to know nothing about the existence of nano thermite. Dr. Harrit refused to speculate, calling instead for a criminal investigation. When asked if a copy of the paper had been sent to the FBI, he responded, "Yes. A copy has actually been sent to (the) FBI. I am not in a position to give a full account of the response, but as I recall, it was surprisingly receptive."

SJB · « **Reply #1 on:** August 25, 2009, 12:54:12 PM »

Quote from: gladius_veritatis

http://futurefastforward.com/feature-articles/2391

Cause Of Destruction Of WTC Discovered - By David Scrimshaw (20/8/09)
David Scrimshaw
Thursday, 20 August 2009 13:00

NewsChief.com

As disturbing as 9/11 was, the peer-reviewed paper of Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen is causing shockwaves around the world.

In the paper, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, Open Chemical Physics Journal, Vol. 2 (2009)," Dr. Harrit and eight other scientists from Denmark, the United States and Australia report the actual cause of the destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 in New York almost eight years ago.

Nano-thermite, a mixture of aluminum and rust powder, reacts to intense heat of 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, producing molten iron and an effective explosion. It can be used as rocket fuel and contains more energy than dynamite. Over 10 tons have been estimated to have been found in Manhattan near the site. While thermite can be bought by anyone for welding (which produces iron), the nano process is performed by and for military uses only.

In an interview with Germany's gulli.com, Dr. Harrit was asked how the substance could have been placed in the towers. Mark Loizeaux, an expert on demolition and whose company was assigned the cleanup of Ground Zero, has claimed to know nothing about the existence of nano thermite. Dr. Harrit refused to speculate, calling instead for a criminal investigation. When asked if a copy of the paper had been sent to the FBI, he responded, "Yes. A copy has actually been sent to (the) FBI. I am not in a position to give a full account of the response, but as I recall, it was surprisingly receptive."

That's funny.

Belloc · « **Reply #2 on:** August 25, 2009, 01:31:58 PM »

Soem day, truth will win out.........like w/Kennedy, most people I talk to do not beleive or are at least skeptical of the "lone gunman" theory.........

SJB · « **Reply #3 on:** August 25, 2009, 01:35:35 PM »

Quote from: Belloc

Soem day, truth will win out.........like w/Kennedy, most people I talk to do not beleive or are at least skeptical of the "lone gunman" theory.........

But until then, you'll speculate away. :)

Belloc · « **Reply #4 on:** August 25, 2009, 01:43:24 PM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: Belloc
Soem day, truth will win out.........like w/Kennedy, most people I talk to do not beleive or are at least skeptical of the "lone gunman" theory.........

But until then, you'll speculate away. :)

Exactly, maybe drop a few hints to make people think :nunchaku:

SJB · « **Reply #5 on:** August 25, 2009, 01:51:39 PM »

Quote from: Belloc

Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Belloc
Soem day, truth will win out.........like w/Kennedy, most people I talk to do not beleive or are at least skeptical of the "lone gunman" theory.........

But until then, you'll speculate away. :)

Exactly, maybe drop a few hints to make people think :nunchaku:

Yes, just like the liberal media. Proper sources and truth at the expense of speculation and "making people think". The end is so valuable and obvious that it justifies the means.

Does that make you think?

Matthew · « **Reply #6 on:** August 25, 2009, 01:54:00 PM »

Oh please.

Anyone with a functioning brain (and a working memory) would not believe the official conspiracy theory story on 9/11. It's ludicrous. Only a nation of public-school raised, dumbed-down TV-watchers would fall for something so ridiculous.

If they "pulled" the same thing (pardon the pun) in 1970, or 1950 the American people wouldn't have believed it.

Matthew

Matthew · « **Reply #7 on:** August 25, 2009, 01:58:40 PM »

Quote from: SJB

Quote from: Belloc
Soem day, truth will win out.........like w/Kennedy, most people I talk to do not beleive or are at least skeptical of the "lone gunman" theory.........

But until then, you'll speculate away. :)

Um, how is Dr. hαɾɾιs' sentence "funny"?

He said he refused to speculate. Good for him.

All he did was mention the TRUTH that there is thermite in the WTC debris. What's wrong with telling something that is true? Let the chips fall where they may.

Your assertion is completely illogical.

Yes, uncovering new 9/11 evidence might "rattle the cage" (Some A is C), and speculating on alternate 9/11 theories might "rattle the cage" (Some B is C), but that doesn't mean that A = B.

Matthew

SJB · « **Reply #8 on:** August 25, 2009, 02:06:15 PM »

Quote from: ChantCd

Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Belloc
Soem day, truth will win out.........like w/Kennedy, most people I talk to do not beleive or are at least skeptical of the "lone gunman" theory.........

But until then, you'll speculate away. :)

Um, how is Dr. hαɾɾιs' sentence "funny"?

He said he refused to speculate. Good for him.

All he did was mention the TRUTH that there is thermite in the WTC debris. What's wrong with telling something that is true? Let the chips fall where they may.

Your assertion is completely illogical.

Yes, uncovering new 9/11 evidence might "rattle the cage" (Some A is C), and speculating on alternate 9/11 theories might "rattle the cage" (Some B is C), but that doesn't mean that A = B.

Matthew

"Dr. Harrit and eight other scientists from Denmark, the United States and Australia report the actual cause of the destruction of towers 1, 2 and 7 in New York almost eight years ago."

Then...

"Dr. Harrit refused to speculate, calling instead for a criminal investigation."

Somebody is speculating here.

Matthew · « **Reply #9 on:** August 25, 2009, 02:09:25 PM »

No, it is not speculating.

If there was thermite in the towers, then they were NOT brought down by 2 planes, etc.

Who set the thermite? How did they cover up the operation? etc. that would be speculation.

Matthew

SJB · « **Reply #10 on:** August 25, 2009, 02:21:38 PM »

You might find this interesting too:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-journal.html

SJB · « **Reply #11 on:** August 25, 2009, 02:26:35 PM »

Quote from: ChantCd

No, it is not speculating.

If there was thermite in the towers, then they were NOT brought down by 2 planes, etc.

Who set the thermite? How did they cover up the operation? etc. that would be speculation.

Matthew

You are assuming this. That is speculation.

The Trade Center was actually bombed in 1993. Why the need to fly planes into it when another bombing would do the trick?

Matthew · « **Reply #12 on:** August 25, 2009, 03:32:22 PM »

Anyone dumb enough to believe the official 9/11 conspiracy theory has been seriously brainwashed, and needs to turn off the TV and think a bit more.

I recommend visiting some good websites (and watching some good videos) that discuss some of the facts surrounding 9/11 that don't jibe with the "Media" version of what happened on 9/11.

Matthew

SJB · « **Reply #13 on:** August 25, 2009, 03:45:41 PM »

Quote from: ChantCd

Anyone dumb enough to believe the official 9/11 conspiracy theory has been seriously brainwashed, and needs to turn off the TV and think a bit more.

I recommend visiting some good websites (and watching some good videos) that discuss some of the facts surrounding 9/11 that don't jibe with the "Media" version of what happened on 9/11.

Matthew

I don't watch TV. And I have read quite a bit of what is out there.

Matthew · « **Reply #14 on:** August 25, 2009, 04:21:32 PM »

Well, at least you put a bit of work into forming your opinion. I just don't want you to parrot back what CNN tells you or something.

Anyhow, figuring out the truth about 9/11 requires a lot of "putting the pieces together", including "cui bono?" and many other factors.

Who has benefitted by 9/11?
Have governments ever perpetrated fαℓѕє fℓαg attacks?
Would our government be capable of such a thing?
Why were no fighter planes scrambled on 9/11?
Why did Building 7 collapse even though it wasn't struck?
Why did 3 buildings collapse in one day, when NO BUILDINGS HAVE EVER COLLAPSED BEFORE on their own, even those that were grievously on fire.
Could Israel have been involved?

I could literally list dozens of questions I have asked myself about this issue.

When taken AS A WHOLE, it points in one direction only.

9/11 was a false-flag attack perpetrated by someone OTHER than a few rude "terrorists" -- likely involving the CIA and Israel's secret service: Mossad. Mossad's motto is "By way of deception thou shalt do war."

Israel destroyed the USS Liberty in the late 60's, and they bomb hospitals, women/children, orphanages, etc. today so I'm sure they'd be capable of something like 9/11.

Matthew

Author Topic: &quot;Cause of Destruction of WTC Discovered&quot; (Read 7049 times)

Author Topic: "Cause of Destruction of WTC Discovered" (Read 7049 times)