Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Women Running Wild  (Read 2057 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Women Running Wild
« Reply #10 on: August 03, 2021, 01:02:49 PM »
Fascinating reactions on a “traditionalist” forum.
You're either delusional or a troll

Offline Romulus

  • Supporter
Re: Women Running Wild
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2021, 01:03:47 PM »
Fascinating reactions on a “traditionalist” forum.
Trads don't beat women


Re: Women Running Wild
« Reply #12 on: August 03, 2021, 01:10:25 PM »
Thesis:

In the decadent West, fathers have been deprived of exercising their duty to corporally punish their wives and daughters. Hence we shouldn’t be at all surprised that women are now running wild in every sphere (e.g., destroying nations through their mass entry into politics). Most women in the West are no longer kept in check through the real threat of violence. This is surely a major part of why most women today are so degenerate, full of attitude, and grossly immodest.

Discuss. (Immersed as we all are in modernism, this is now an explosive thesis. I know. Kindly resist any temptation to virtue signal. The capacity to emote is no measure of virtue, especially when such emoting is in conformity with the dismal standards of a thoroughly degenerate age.)
You started a thread on the same subject of corporeal punishment on wives in another thread. I asked you there a question you never anwered:


Quote
Last Tradhican wrote: One man's "corporal discipline" of wives is another's wife beating. Let's cut to the chase: What is your method in detail?

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Women Running Wild
« Reply #13 on: August 03, 2021, 01:13:58 PM »
We have a massive infamous thread on this subject a long time ago.

There is some small bit of opinion which holds that corporal punishment of wives by their husbands is permissible, in extreme cases like adultery, but I disagree.  While it is permissible for a father to impose corporal punishment on his children, husbands are required to honor their wives.  Just as it would be wrong to strike a parent (since we are commanded to honor them), I hold that the requirement to for husbands to honor their wives precludes corporal punishment as it would against a parent.  And even if it WERE permissible, almost everyone would agree that it's extremely imprudent and would likely not have its intended effect.

While it's permissible for daughters, even there I disagree that lack of corporal punishment is responsible for their decline in mores.  If anything, if a girl already has a feminist mindset, corporal punishment would only increase that due to their resentment.  Of course, younger girls below the age of reason might benefit from some corporal punishment since it can help to curb bad behaviors when "reasoning" with them cannot.  For older girls, this would likely increase their resentment of all male authority figures and would incline them toward feminism.

If the ONLY thing holding women and girls back from bad behavior were corporal punishment, the battle is likely already lost for their souls ... even if it were sufficient to curb some behavior due to the deterrent and the fear.

Re: Women Running Wild
« Reply #14 on: August 03, 2021, 01:16:47 PM »
We have a massive infamous thread on this subject a long time ago.

There is some small bit of opinion which holds that corporal punishment of wives by their husbands is permissible, in extreme cases like adultery, but I disagree.  While it is permissible for a father to impose corporal punishment on his children, husbands are required to honor their wives.  Just as it would be wrong to strike a parent (since we are commanded to honor them), I hold that the requirement to for husbands to honor their wives precludes corporal punishment as it would against a parent.  And even if it WERE permissible, almost everyone would agree that it's extremely imprudent and would likely not have its intended effect.

While it's permissible for daughters, even there I disagree that lack of corporal punishment is responsible for their decline in mores.  If anything, if a girl already has a feminist mindset, corporal punishment would only increase that due to their resentment.  Of course, younger girls below the age of reason might benefit from some corporal punishment since it can help to curb bad behaviors when "reasoning" with them cannot.  For older girls, this would likely increase their resentment of all male authority figures and would incline them toward feminism.

If the ONLY thing holding women and girls back from bad behavior were corporal punishment, the battle is likely already lost for their souls ... even if it were sufficient to curb some behavior due to the deterrent and the fear.
Giving my son a quick spank on the butt does wonders. But I haven't really done so with my daughter because it doesn't have the same effect, she tends to lash out more.