Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Winston Churchill's 1920 Article Explaining that There Are Good and Bad Jєωs  (Read 154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10512
  • Reputation: +3267/-207
  • Gender: Male
  • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
Winston Churchill's Famous 1920 Article Explaining that There Are 'Good Jєωs', and 'Bad Jєωs'
"This (revolutionary) movement among the Jєωs is not new... It played a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jєωs. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jєωs. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jєωιѕн leaders."
Winston Churchill Tue, Jan 21, 2020 | 2100 words 3,069 148
The Jєωιѕн Question

First published in the Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), February 8, 1920. Churchill's original headline for this articles was: 'Zionism versus Bolshevism.' Later in his career, in the late 30s, Churchill, possibly part Jєωιѕн himself, relied on wealthy Jєωs to finance his political career, doing their bidding in trying to start a war with Germany. This article was written in less cynical times. He was 46 when he wrote it.

SOME people like Jєωs and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world.
Disraeli, the Jєω Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to his race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jєωs.” Certainly when we look at the miserable state of Russia, where of all countries in the world the Jєωs were the most cruelly treated, and contrast it with the fortunes of our own country, which seems to have been so providentially preserved amid the awful perils of these times, we must admit that nothing that has since happened in the history of the world has falsified the truth of Disraeli’s confident assertion.
Good and Bad Jєωs.
The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jєωιѕн race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified. We owe to the Jєωs in the Christian revelation a system of ethics which, even if it were entirely separated from the supernatural, would be incomparably the most precious possession of mankind, worth in fact the fruits of all other wisdom and learning put together. On that system and by that faith there has been built out of the wreck of the Roman Empire the whole of our existing civilisation.

And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical.
"National" Jєωs.
There can be no greater mistake than to attribute to each individual a recognisable share in the qualities which make up the national character. There are all sorts of men – good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent – in every country, and in every race. Nothing is more wrong than to deny to an individual, on account of race or origin, his right to be judged on his personal merits and conduct. In a people of peculiar genius like the Jєωs, contrasts are more vivid, the extremes are more widely separated, the resulting consequences are more decisive.
At the present fateful period there are three main lines of political conception among the Jєωs, two of which are helpful and hopeful in a very high degree to humanity, and the third absolutely destructive.
First there are the Jєωs who, dwelling in every country throughout the world, identify themselves with that country, enter into its national life, and, while adhering faithfully to their own religion, regard themselves as citizens in the fullest sense of the State which has received them. Such a Jєω living in England would say, “I am an Englishman practising the Jєωιѕн faith.” This is a worthy conception, and useful in the highest degree. We in Great Britain well know that during the great struggle the influence of what may be called the “National Jєωs” in many lands was cast preponderatingly on the side of the Allies; and in our own Army Jєωιѕн soldiers have played a most distinguished part, some rising to the command of armies, others winning the Victoria Cross for valour.
The National Russian Jєωs, in spite of the disabilities under which they have suffered, have managed to play an honourable and useful part in the national life even of Russia. As bankers and industrialists they have strenuously promoted the development of Russia’s economic resources and they were foremost in the creation of those remarkable organisations, the Russian Co-operative Societies. In politics their support has been given, for the most part, to liberal and progressive movements, and they have been among the staunchest upholders of friendship with France and Great Britain.
International Jєωs.
In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jєωιѕн effort rise the schemes of the International Jєωs. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jєωs are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world.
This movement among the Jєωs is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
Terrorist Jєωs.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jєωs. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jєωs. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jєωιѕн leaders.
Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jєωs. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jєωs is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jєωs, and in some notable cases by Jєωesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jєωs in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jєωs every whit as bad as the worst of the Jєωιѕн revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.
"Protector of the Jєωs."
Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people. Wherever General Denikin’s authority could reach, protection was always accorded to the Jєωιѕн population, and strenuous efforts were made by his officers to prevent reprisals and to punish those guilty of them. So much was this the case that the Petlurist propaganda against General Denikin denounced him as the Protector of the Jєωs.
The Misses Healy, nieces of Mr. Tim Healy, in relating their personal experiences in Kieff, have declared that to their knowledge on more than one occasion officers who committed offences against Jєωs were reduced to the ranks and sent out of the city to the front. But the hordes of brigands by whom the whole vast expanse of the Russian Empire is becoming infested do not hesitate to gratify their lust for blood and for revenge at the expense of the innocent Jєωιѕн population whenever an opportunity occurs. The brigand Makhno, the hordes of Petlura and of Gregorieff, who signalised their every success by the most brutal massacres, everywhere found among the half-stupefied, half-infuriated population an eager response to anti-Semitism in its worst and foulest forms.
The fact that in many cases Jєωιѕн interests and Jєωιѕн places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jєωιѕн race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated. This is an injustice on millions of helpless people, most of whom are themselves sufferers from the revolutionary regime. It becomes, therefore, specially important to foster and develop any strongly-marked Jєωιѕн movement which leads directly away from these fatal associations. And it is here that Zionism has such a deep significance for the whole world at the present time.
A Home for the Jєωs.
Zionism offers the third sphere to the political conceptions of the Jєωιѕн race. In violent contrast to international communism, it presents to the Jєω a national idea of a commanding character. It has fallen to the British Government, as the result of the conquest of Palestine, to have the opportunity and the responsibility of securing for the Jєωιѕн race all over the world a home and a centre of national life.
The statesmanship and historic sense of Mr. Balfour were prompt to seize this opportunity. Declarations have been made which have irrevocably decided the policy of Great Britain. The fiery energies of Dr. Weissmann, the leader, for practical purposes, of the Zionist project, backed by many of the most prominent British Jєωs, and supported by the full authority of Lord Allenby, are all directed to achieving the success of this inspiring movement.
Of course, Palestine is far too small to accommodate more than a fraction of the Jєωιѕн race, nor do the majority of national Jєωs wish to go there. But if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jєωιѕн State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jєωs, an event would have occurred in the history of the world which would, from every point of view, be beneficial, and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire.
Zionism has already become a factor in the political convulsions of Russia, as a powerful competing influence in Bolshevik circles with the international communistic system. Nothing could be more significant than the fury with which Trotsky has attacked the Zionists generally, and Dr. Weissmann in particular.
The cruel penetration of his mind leaves him in no doubt that his schemes of a world-wide communistic State under Jєωιѕн domination are directly thwarted and hindered by this new ideal, which directs the energies and the hopes of Jєωs in every land towards a simpler, a truer, and a far more attainable goal. The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jєωs is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jєωιѕн people.
Duty of Loyal Jєωs.
It is particularly important in these circuмstances that the national Jєωs in every country who are loyal to the land of their adoption should come forward on every occasion, as many of them in England have already done, and take a prominent part in every measure for combating the Bolshevik conspiracy. In this way they will be able to vindicate the honour of the Jєωιѕн name and make it clear to all the world that the Bolshevik movement is not a Jєωιѕн movement, but is repudiated vehemently by the great mass of the Jєωιѕн race.
But a negative resistance to Bolshevism in any field is not enough. Positive and practicable alternatives are needed in the moral as well as in the social sphere; and in building up with the utmost possible rapidity a Jєωιѕн national centre in Palestine which may become not only a refuge to the oppressed from the unhappy lands of Central Europe, but which will also be a symbol of Jєωιѕн unity and the temple of Jєωιѕн glory, a task is presented on which many blessings rest.


Source: Wikisource


Support Russia Insider - Go Ad-Free!


Offline cassini

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Reputation: +2085/-236
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Of course there are good and bad Jєωs. Many of the Jєωs killed in Hitler's camps were poor Jєωs, families living in poverty.
    But here is a story my mother, Lord rest her soul, told me. She lived in Dublin Ireland in the 1920s when there were few jobs for ther ordinary people. She told me there were Jєωs who owned cloths factories, a reason for some to say 'yes, rich Jєωs' exploiting the people. But these Jєωs, my mother said, gave employment to many who could have starved in those times. The workers were treated well and my mother was grateful to them giving employment. Indeed Mammy, who was a Mass going Catholic girl, told me one of her best friends was a Jєωιѕн girl. That conversation is still with me 65 years later. It was the only time I heard a kind word said about 'good' Jєωs, as all are usually depicted as bad Jєωs even on Catholic forums.