Author Topic: WikiLeaks: Jєω wants to foment "Catholic Spring" (Read 547 times)

Croix de Fer · « **on:** October 13, 2016, 12:10:16 AM »

Jєω Sandy Newman wants to foment a "Catholic Spring" (infiltration of progressivism into the Church). He emails his subversive desire to Hillary Clinton's top campaign aid, John Podesta:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6293

Quote

Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . .

We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up. I'll discuss with Tara. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is the other person to consult.

On 2/10/12, Sandy Newman <sandynewman@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, John,

> > This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even
> though 98% of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used
> contraception has me thinking . . . There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in > which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and
> the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the
> Catholic church. Is contraceptive coverage an issue around which that could
> happen. The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic > Hospital Association support of the Administration's new policy, together
> with "the 98%" create an opportunity?

>

> Of course, this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the > Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and > priests who count on it for their maintenance, etc. Even if the idea isn't > crazy, I don't qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about > how one would "plant the seeds of the revolution," or who would plant them. > Just wondering . . .

>

> Hoping you're well, and getting to focus your time in the ways you want.
>
> Sandy
>
> Sandy Newman, President
> Voices for Progress
> 202.669.8754
> voicesforprogress.org

nctradcath · « **Reply #1 on:** October 13, 2016, 04:41:17 AM »

They are already far to late. The Vatican 2 anti-popes already did so.

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #2 on:** October 13, 2016, 06:58:54 AM »

Someone needs to smack that Sandy Newman into paralysis. This isn't England where the government controls the church.

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #3 on:** October 13, 2016, 04:57:55 PM »

Quote from: nctradcath

They are already far to late. The Vatican 2 anti-popes already did so.

They now think the counterfeit church is not moving along fast enough in being openly, full blown Anti-Christ.

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #4 on:** October 14, 2016, 06:26:29 PM »

NeverTrumpers don't care. They'll gladly sell out themselves and everyone else, so long as their fantasy of hate can become real.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #5 on:** October 14, 2016, 10:58:17 PM »

Quote from: nctradcath

They are already far to late. The Vatican 2 anti-popes already did so.

While Vat.II went a long way to breaking up resistance to the Jєωιѕн contagion, it by no means finished the job.

For no small reason did Our Lord warn us to BEWARE the leaven of the Pharisees.