WHY DOES THE GOVERNMENT FEAR ARMED VETERANS?

by Alan Stang
January 4, 2008

Recent passage by the District of Criminals of the legislation known
colloquially as the Veteran Disarmament bill raises the question of why
the conspiracy for world government would want to disarm returning
veterans. The conspiracy trusted these men to use the most devastating
ordinance abroad; it does not trust them to keep and bear much smaller
weapons here at home. The obvious answer is that these are the millions of
well trained military men I was talking about in my recent piece about a
possible assassination threat to Dr. Ron Paul.

These are the men the psychos at the top are afraid of, the men who can
stick the red dot in their eye from a mile away. The psychos know these
men are out there, watching, stewing, temperatures rising every day; they
are beginning to understand that they are dying now because the psychos
have poisoned them with Depleted Uranium in the field.

They are beginning to realize that the buddies and the limbs they left
behind in Iraq were lost not in defense of this beloved country but in
behalf of the megalomaniacal nightmare of conquest the psychos think is
"normal." Now the veterans understand that the monsters who sent them half
way around the world to get sick are dismantling the system of freedom the
Founding Fathers gave us here at home.

So far, they haven't said much, but the psychos know they are simmering
and that something could set them off. So, the nαzιs at the top want their
guns, because it is very nerve wracking to have to keep watching your
chest and tum-tum, hoping that if you see the red dot there soon enough
you will have time to hunker down before the round that follows it smashes
through your perfumed skull and distributes gobs of your polluted brain
all over the haute couture ensembles of the distinguished ladies enjoying
cocktails on the balcony of your penthouse.

Proof that they are crazy is their assumption that passage of this "law,"
signed by Communist world government traitor Jorge W. Boosh, will
intimidate these men - who have come home from Hell - into surrendering
the ordinance they are buying to the bare walls at gun shows and stores;
which logically brings us to the proper application of the Second
Amendment.

Some Americans understand that the main purpose of the Second Amendment is
not hunting, not sport shooting and not even self-defense, although it
would certainly underwrite those worthy activities. No, the Fathers wanted
each and all of us to be armed in the event that somewhere down the road
this shaky experiment they had created but did not trust themselves - the
federal government - were to get out of control and try to destroy our
rights.

They wanted us to "keep and bear" - to carry - the guns we would need to
do the job if it became necessary to "abolish" the government. Remember,
the government is not the country. They are two entirely different things.
The District of Criminals is the government. You are the country.

Of course, these are not my ideas. I can't take credit for them. Remember
that the nation's birth certificate - the Declaration of Independence -
says that whenever government becomes oppressive, whenever it tries to
deny their rights, the people under it have the unalienable right to rise
up and cast it off, even "abolish" it.

So, I write with the authority and under the protection of the President
of the United States, because the man who wrote the Declaration later
became President. Indeed, he also wrote that every generation or so, the
people should rise up and enjoy a bloody revolution, in which the tree of
liberty is refreshed "with the blood of patriots and tyrants," presumably
to remind everyone who has the power.

Many Americans know this and believe it, but I have yet to see a piece by
some expert explaining what it would be like today to "abolish" the
federal government as the Declaration teaches. How would it be done?
Remember, I am merely speculating about some statements by the President
of the United States. I am advocating nothing. I am too decrepit to do
something myself. Shirley Temple in her prime could take me down. And
everyone I know is as decrepit as I am. I do know from the movies that the
bullet comes out of the round hole in the gun, but that is all I know.

No, I am merely speculating as a professional commentator for almost fifty
years about what others - others I don't know - could elect to do. The
fury of the responses I am still receiving from around the world to my
pieces about the possible assassination of Dr. Ron Paul tell me that such
speculation is desperately needed today - especially from the real
military experts -but, strangely, I have seen none. So you will have to
settle for speculation from me.

Who, in the Founding Fathers thinking, would abolish the government, if it
goes wrong? It would be the militia. What was and is the militia? Despite
the obfuscatory efforts of nαzι gun confiscators like Carolyn McCarthy and
Sarah Brady (Lord preserve us from crazy women whose husbands have been
shot!) and Chuck Schumer (another schmuck), the Fathers said the militia
was the able-bodied men in a community, i.e., the veterans the nαzιs are
now trying to disarm.


What the Fathers could not anticipate, and would be utterly horrified to
learn, is that the experiment they created - and were so suspicious of
themselves - has by now metastasized into a totalitarian monster that
makes George III and his charming, little tea tax look pleasantly quaint,
something Ludwig von Mises and Dr. Ron Paul would endorse as a classic
exemplar of Free Enterprise.

With the destruction by the Boosh treason gang of the Posse Comitatus law,
our military now can intervene domestically like George III's British
Army. Local police have been militarized. Their SWAT teams have been
trained to perform military functions. Brainwashing has turned some of
them into imperial zombies who would make Darth Vader proud. The Boosh
treason gang has canceled habeas corpus, the ancient Jєωel of our system
of law, and its ability to spy on us would inspire Heinrich Himmler to
register Republican.

Many commentators make the point that we must tread with great caution, to
avoid giving Boosh & Co. the excuse to impose martial law. Those warnings
are very wise. The Boosh treason gang is looking for such an excuse to try
their new weapons that can fry your brains and look inside your underwear.
If the militia accidentally gives them one, they will use it to cover and
justify themselves.

But if the militia does not, the Boosh treason gang would not stand down
and go home. It would concoct a reason. What we are really talking about
here is timing, is when it will happen. Remember that four-star general
Tommy Franks, who led the invasion of Iraq, said that the next emergency
like Nine Eleven would cancel the Constitution. And when a four-star
general speaks, I listen. So, the mistake the militia could make is not to
act; it is to act at the wrong time.

Despite this, some people say the risk is too great; that only the moral
power of non-violent resistance could work. Yes, it could and did, in
British India and the American South. But it could work only against
people who have consciences non-violent resistance can afflict. British
India and the American South were Christian. The monsters who control the
District of Criminals now are not. Using non-violent resistance against
them would be like using it against a crocodile.

How could it happen? For about a century, we have lived under government
by emergency. I have lived abroad in a couple of other countries, so I
know what it is like just to live. Most Americans do not. Here we endure
endless "wars," and "emergencies," in quotation marks because they are as
phony as a one dollar bill, not just the military wars, WWI, WWII, etc.
and etc., but also the "War on Poverty," the "War on Drugs," etc. So my
speculation is that the next phase in the battle to subdue America will be
launched with the pretext of some new "war" or "emergency."

It could be financial via the impending, engineered "collapse of the
dollar." It could be military, via the attack on Iran. Another terrorist
attack across the country, even bigger than Nine Eleven could launch it.
My speculation is that the conspiracy could use a medical attack. Among
the advantages of such an attack is the fact that it affects everyone. The
victims don't even know they are under attack. And Boosh has said in
almost as many words that a contagious epidemic of something like "bird
flu," or some other concocted disorder could trigger a "national
quarantine."

What would that include? It would include the camps. Remember the camps?
One hesitates to call them "concentration" camps, but that is where the
population would be concentrated. Remember that the English invented
cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs to win the Boer War. Then Hitler, ever the copy cat -
he copied his racial "science" from people like Planned Parenthood's
Margaret Sanger - copied them. Now they sit here, built by Halliburton,
staffed, supplied, fenced, but empty, ready and waiting.

Waiting for whom? For illegal alien invaders of our country, brought here
by the Boosh treason gang? My guess is no, because no illegal alien is
incarcerated there, despite overwhelming provocations like enormous
numbers. There are only two kinds of people in this country: illegal
aliens and legal residents. If the camps are not meant for illegal aliens,
they are meant for us. One reason - preeminent among many - could be a
national epidemic.

A new "terrorist attack," or a national quarantine could be the best
"temporary" use for those camps. How would you get there? You would get
there by bus, supplied by the kindly federal government, which would also
help "solve" the "problem" of the guns. The Boosh treason gang knows as
much about the guns as I do. More. They know the militia will not give
them up. So, when the bus comes down the streets, would the militia fall
for this?

"We're not asking you to give up your guns, as we did in New Orleans. That
lawyer, the one we saw on television promising that, if we came for his
guns, somebody would die, scared us. The little, old lady the SWATster
from California disarmed, was a public relations disaster. So, no, we
certainly won't take your guns. We don't believe in that. Taking your guns
would violate the Second Amendment. Just get on the bus. Leave your guns
right where they are, in your gun cabinets. Be reasonable. The bus will be
full of women and children. In such cramped conditions your guns could
endanger them. The guns will be where you leave them when you come home."

Would the militia fall for that? It sounds so "reasonable." It would sound
even more "reasonable," if a preacher from the totalitarian "religious
right" were there to plead with you to be "reasonable." Do you really want
to be a sorehead? Indeed, would the militia get on the bus at all, with or
without arms? Or would the abolition of the government start at the curb?
When the bus arrives, would it be too late? Or would the bus find no one
home?

Which logically raises the forbidding question of how the militia would
fight such fearsome weapons? Remember, I am writing under the protection
of the President of the United States. I advocate nothing. I am simply
speculating, wondering, which is certainly "reasonable" to do in the
present situation. What would a galvanized militia do?

Tradition would pick a leader, organize and recruit, thinking that the new
organization would grow quickly and do what is required. Sadly, that would
probably be the worst action to take. During a century and more of
activity, the conspiracy for world government has become quite adept at
the art of infiltration. It infiltrates any and every organization that is
or could become influential.

Indeed, before long the ringer the conspirators send to infiltrate the new
patriot organization would be running it. How? Simply because the
infiltrator would be the best member. He would be the man you always call
on. He would do the dirty jobs, the jobs no one else will do. He would
come early and stay late.

Other members of the group would be proud of him. "Good old Charlie. He's
the heart and soul of the group." Soon, the group would be perverted,
implementing a goal completely different from the one the founder
proclaimed. The organization would be working against itself, useless.
Remember the priceless New Yorker cartoon? It shows a dark, smoky opium
den, in which half a dozen men hold guns on each other. The caption says,
"You mean, we're all Treasury agents?"

Any leader that emerges would be bribed, co-opted, blackmailed or killed.
Hasn't this happened again and again? You don't need to guess about it. I
have named some of the fallen in previous pieces. So, my speculation is
that, when the feces hit the fan, the militia would choose different
methods. What would they do? If organization and leaders wouldn't work,
what would? How can you win a battle without them?

My guess is that first they would read Anabasis by Xenophon, a historian
who wrote some four hundred years before Jesus. Anabasis is the story of
some ten thousand Greeks, betrayed and stranded on the Anatolian plateau,
in what is now Turkey, who had to fight their way through hundreds of
miles and numberless Persian enemies, from ancient Babylon, near modern
Baghdad, to the Black Sea and home.

Their general, Clearchus, invited to a "peace conference" was captured and
killed. They had no leader. Yet, the ten thousand beat the Persians, who
outnumbered them by a factor too high to multiply. How? Xenophon, who was
one of them, relates that when the leader in a Persian unit was killed,
the unit would disintegrate. When a Greek commander was killed, the next
man in line became the leader. Every Greek was a general. One of the most
thrilling scenes in all literature comes when the head of the column
arrives and the others hear them shouting, "The sea! The sea!"

How does this apply here and now? Remember, a military man really should
be writing this. I am what George Wallace used to call a "pointy-head" -
you can actually see the point on my head - not a military man, but I am
writing it because I haven't found a military man who is. Remember also
that I write under the protection and with the authority of the President
of the United States.

My speculation is that when the conspiracy for world government finally
does come all the way out into the open, when it tries to nail the
dictatorship down by imposing martial law, the militia would employ a
tactic the military men in the Nam used to call "target of opportunity,"
in a species of guerrilla warfare. There would be nothing to infiltrate;
no address, no headquarters, no membership records to seize. There would
be no leaders to execute. Every man would be a general, or, as one of my
readers has suggested, a fish in the sea, a fish with teeth, a sea teeming
with piranha.


The militia would strike from the shadows and be gone before the world
government nαzιs could respond. Wouldn't that get nasty? Mercy sakes, yes,
it would get nasty, nasty beyond the imagination of most Americans to
conceive. It would get nasty because the conspiracy for world government
is trying to impose a dictatorship and has already killed tens of millions
around the world for the purpose in the most horrifying ways. They treat
our own military men like dirt. If they were to obey the Constitution, my
guess is that none of this would happen, but did you really think they
would just put down their brain fryers and walk away?

What would the militia do? First, pray that nothing happens to the
President. Yes, Boosh is a traitor, but remember that his successor would
be Darth Cheney, who could be his control. Yes, Soviet agent Heinz
Kissinger is a traitor, but the militia would probably not run into him
and the same with traitor David Rockefeller who actually confesses in his
autobiography that he is "part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States."

They are protected by layers of security. Of course, they could
accidentally become "targets of opportunity." Pray that they don't.
Honestly, I would hate to hear that treasonous scuмbag Herr Kissinger or
David Rockefeller's entourage turned the wrong corner and were obliterated
by a superannuated 82nd Airborne unit ("Death From the Sky") in a bloody
cross fire that left their greasy body parts hanging on a fence.

When and if - God forbid! - this thing starts to happen, how will you know
it is genuine, or phony? You will certainly know it is phony if it kills
large numbers of innocent bystanders, who just happen to be present. That
kind of thing is the telltale signature of governments conducting
Communist terror to intimidate populations, like the bombings presently
perpetrated in the Middle East. What we are speculating about here, on the
contrary, would regrettably target the individual guilty perpetrators of
world government crimes.

Who would they be? Some genius has said that all politics are local. The
conspiracy for world government has a big Achilles heel. Somebody has to
enforce the myriad dictatorial controls the conspiracy has imposed. Some
of those controls are installed by local governments inspired by federal
bribes. That is how the District of Criminals nationalized the local
police.


Others are administered by locally-based federal employees. They range
from the construction of your commode to the new, mandatory light bulb
loaded with extremely toxic mercury; from banning political signs for the
"wrong' candidate on your own property to prison for a cancer victim who
uses marijuana prescribed by his physician for pain, to the use of
"federal" land, and on and on and on.

The totalitarian insults are endless. Yes, the militia could reach the
monsters at the top only with the greatest difficulty, only by accident
that creates a "target of opportunity." But the pimps who must impose the
metastasizing dictatorship - and are essential to it - are easy to reach.
The militia knows who they are, where they are, even where they live.

They could even live next door. Sadly, they have made themselves
progressively obnoxious. They strut and preen about their new power. They
can't be fired and make more money and benefits than you do. They think
they are the new Lords of Creation. As you read this paragraph, each of
you sees their exulting faces in mind's eye. What would happen if one by
one they disappear? Would not their ranks be roiled by panic? Remember
that the dictatorship could not work without them. Would they start to
call in sick?

What could such a tactic accomplish? Remember Alexander Solzhenitsyn? His
Gulag Archipelago introduced a new word to our language. Because the Party
line at the time called for constant reminders of the horrors of the
Soviet system, he was a media darling here for a few years - until the
famous speech at Harvard in which he denounced the spiritual collapse of
the West and said that like his own people we have forgotten God. Our
Communist media dropped him like a rock. He has been back in Russia for
many years. Today, few Americans have ever heard of him.

Solzhenitsyn says this: "And how we burned in the camps later, thinking:
What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went
out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return
alive and had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass
arrests . . . people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with
terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the
staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly
set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes,
hammers, pokers or whatever else was at hand? . . . And you could be sure
ahead of time that you would be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what
about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely
chauffeur - what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs
would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and
. . . the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"

Solzhenitsyn concludes: "If . . . if . . . We didn't love freedom enough.
And even more - we had no awareness of the real situation. . . . [W]e
hurried to submit. We submitted with pleasure! . . . We purely and simply
deserved everything that happened afterward." Are we aware of the real
situation? Do we love freedom enough? If not, we shall deserve everything
the conspiracy for world government is preparing to do. Like Solzhenitsyn,
you would have plenty of time to discuss it in the Halliburton camps.

There is another Achilles Heel. Yes, it is perfectly true that the psychos
have weapons that would make most private arms look like sling shots. But
precisely because those weapons are so sophisticated, they are run by
computers. And the Freedom Forces have the nerds who run the computers,
and who know that defeat would mean the loss of their internet freedoms.
That is why Dr. No enjoys almost universal nerd support. And they can hack
into anything! I speculate that when the fit hits the shan the nerds could
bring the system down. What would that do to the psychos' weapons? The
plethora of history and economics majors in the Dr. Paul ranks can easily
be explained. He is the only candidate who knows what they are talking
about.

Remember, I do not advocate anything. I don't do anything. Because I'm so
decrepit I don't know anyone who does. I'm too decrepit to hit a face with
a pie. I'm simply speculating about what could happen, based on where we
are now, combined with the scary feedback I am still receiving from the
militia. The only thing I advocate is complete, docile obedience to law,
in the true spirit of Romans 13 and the teachings of the President of the
United States.


Which recalls the fact that fears for my own safety are now arriving.
Regular readers warn I could be killed myself. I do not believe it. Why
would anyone take the risk of rubbing out a man as meek, as mild and
inoffensive, as your doddering correspondent? But just in case these
warnings have substance, may I publicly suggest that I have earned the
services of a professional who will commit to do a thorough job. My
innumerable warrior grandma fans around the world would be very disturbed
were an amateur merely to mess up my good looks. There is also the fact
that these grandmas are already riled up. Believe me; you don't want to
make them any madder.