I didn’t write it - a man did .
I’m allowed to agree.
 Personally I don’t think women should have ever gotten the vote .
I suspect there would be millions more children alive and voting would be in the hands of reasonable unfeminized or emasculated Catholic  men . 
This is a goal we should all strive for instead of getting chewed up iby this immoral Zionist  meat grinder of a “ government”.

I don’t have a problem with women voting. I do have a problem with uneducated men, women, and non citizens voting. People must pass a literacy proficiency and history/civics test IN ENGLISH, before anyone votes. Voting should be limited ages 21 and up, not 18. Go back to 18 for smoking and drinking.  Mess up and you wait to 25 to be legal for alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and your driving rights.
BTW, I didn’t vote last election because there was no worthy candidate and writing in Jesus is just ridiculous, a waste of time. I stayed in the car and prayed the Rosary outside the polling place. 

voting should be men only who have land in my opinion. and voting is dumb, anyway. 

I didn’t write it - a man did .

Who wrote it? 

this guy posted it:
Truth Teller on X: "The Lesser Evil Trap: Why Catholic Conscience Demands Voting Abstention 👇 https://t.co/tao5utAgSZ" / 

I'm trying to find out who wrote it. If I find out, I'll post it.

I witnessed this trap very cleverly being used for a long time. This so called lesser evil over time keeps getting a bigger evil. When I read about messages that Marie Julie Jahenny recevied from Our Lord about democracy as a freemasonic invention, it all made sense. 
Henry V. didn't reject republic and new flag for nothing. He didn't want to become a marionet or a politicar figure for display only, like some kings are today. Monarchy excludes parliament, voting, "power comes from people" and similars freemasonic doctrines and concepts. 
In Croatia I don't remember any political party from declaring the imdependance that was for banning all types of abortion, I mean in all situations. 

But in exceptional cases, a few of them understand this better than many men, right?

There are always exceptions when human judgment comes into play. When God speaks, it’s definite, no exceptions. 

Examples:— God speaks, “Remember the Sabbath Day; to keep it holy.”  Third Commandment, non-negotiable, no exceptions.

The Church speaks, “Attend Mass on all Sundays and Holy Days.”  First precept, Catholics must do, HOWEVER, there are exceptions. A Catholic may skip Mass if he is sick or injured, or caring for someone sick or injured, he performs work essential to the society at all times, ie. doctor, nurse, police, fire fighter, provision of needs like food, shelter, certain repairs, necessary transportation and related, infants, very young, (under age seven), elderly and mentally or developmentally limited, those without necessary transportation, poverty-can’t afford travel, lacking proper or adequate clothing, not working results in extreme hardship, attendance at Mass gives serious scandal, going to Mass exposes to great danger to self or others, ie. war, high crime area, outbreak of contagion, dangerous weather or predicted weather conditions, Mass is too far away, travel is arduous, one is in a submarine or in a spacecraft, political conditions prevent it, a person is incarcerated or detained, one has charge of the incarcerated.
In addition, one may be dispensed from Mass attendance by a priest for particular, personal reasons. 

The first precept of the Church in no way cancels the Third Commandment. Catholics must keep Sunday and holy days as to honor Our Lord even if he is excused from Mass. The only legitimate reason for not keeping the Third Commandment is that of impossibility, be it physical, intellectual, moral, spiritual. These would include if a person is in a coma, has dementia or is unable to understand anything, low or no intelligence, is in a situation of invincible ignorance, not by his own fault.