Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Fighting Errors in the Modern World => Topic started by: RomanCatholic1953 on June 29, 2020, 01:17:34 PM
-
WHITE SLAVES: THE PRIVILEGE THEY ERASED FROM HISTORY
Published: June 29, 2020
https://youtu.be/MwN-Pdfd-Qo
SOURCE: DANA ASHLIE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwN-Pdfd-Qo)
Our history is written by the victors. What presentation of our history would best suite their chosen 'end game' for us? The straight up erasing of true history has happened on the topic of slavery in America. Who gains and who is set to lose? As for those who feel moved to financially support this YouTube video work via your donations, HALLELUJAH!
To donate via PayPal, put the following into your browser bar: paypal.me/DanaAshlie or reach me old school: Dana A PO Box 3324 Blue Jay, CA 92317
READ MORE... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwN-Pdfd-Qo)
SHARE THIS ARTICLE...
-
btt
-
Dana Ashlie is an attractive, well-meaning lady. Nonetheless, her message is identical to the message of the controlled conservative establishment: seek an explanation of society's ills in any direction except that of the one group possessing the means and the goals necessary and sufficient to explain every facet of what is happening.
Moreover, her view of race-based problems is evidently that although blacks are violent, sɛҳuąƖly degenerate, disposed to criminality, generally crude and vulgar, and most of all, utterly convinced that they are entitled to anything they want because of centuries of mistreatment at the hands of white people, they are as they are solely because they have been getting the wrong message from the media. To truly believe such rubbish is to be dangerously and self-destructively naive. The US landscape is littered with dead Beckys and Karens who preferred media-approved fantasy to safety—and they ended up getting neither approval nor safety.
Ms. Ashlie seems not yet to have learned that there is nothing "racist" or un-Christian in facing the fact that even under ideal circuмstances, the number of Thomas Sowells, Walter Williamses, Leontyne Prices, and Sugar Ray Robinsons that emerge from the black population is unlikely ever to be larger than it now is. Nor is that number likely to do anything but diminish until blacks stop letting Jєωs lead them around by the nose—or rather, till someone stops Jєωs from leading and blacks from being led.
Wishful thinking has no place on anyone's list of the Christian virtues. If poche claims otherwise, he better have more evidence to cite than his thousandth reference to a cherry-picked sentence from Mit Brennender Sorge.
-
Dana Ashlie is an attractive, well-meaning lady. Nonetheless, her message is identical to the message of the controlled conservative establishment: seek an explanation of society's ills in any direction except that of the one group possessing the means and the goals necessary and sufficient to explain every facet of what is happening.
Moreover, her view of race-based problems is evidently that although blacks are violent, sɛҳuąƖly degenerate, disposed to criminality, generally crude and vulgar, and most of all, utterly convinced that they are entitled to anything they want because of centuries of mistreatment at the hands of white people, they are as they are solely because they have been getting the wrong message from the media. To truly believe such rubbish is to be dangerously and self-destructively naive. The US landscape is littered with dead Beckys and Karens who preferred media-approved fantasy to safety—and they ended up getting neither approval nor safety.
Ms. Ashlie seems not yet to have learned that there is nothing "racist" or un-Christian in facing the fact that even under ideal circuмstances, the number of Thomas Sowells, Walter Williamses, Leontyne Prices, and Sugar Ray Robinsons that emerge from the black population is unlikely ever to be larger than it now is. Nor is that number likely to do anything but diminish until blacks stop letting Jєωs lead them around by the nose—or rather, till someone stops Jєωs from leading and blacks from being led.
Wishful thinking has no place on anyone's list of the Christian virtues. If poche claims otherwise, he better have more evidence to cite than his thousandth reference to a cherry-picked sentence from Mit Brennender Sorge.
Much wisdom in these four paragraphs. It's my prayer that some of CI's approval-seeking Beckys and Karens will benefit from it.
-
btt
Field Agent activation code confirmed?
-
Field Agent activation code confirmed?
I was swallowing some iced coffee when I read this. If it had been mashed potatoes in my mouth instead, I would have choked to death from laughing instead of just messing up the T-shirt I'm wearing.
-
Field Agent activation code confirmed?
For the uninitiated, btt means bump this thread.
-
I was swallowing some iced coffee when I read this. If it had been mashed potatoes in my mouth instead, I would have choked to death from laughing instead of just messing up the T-shirt I'm wearing.
Apologies, Claudel. I'm glad no further damage was done. I'm enjoying a cold glass of iced coffee myself at the moment. Nothing hits the spot as well on a miserably hot day.
Cheers!
-
For the uninitiated, btt means bump this thread.
Thanks for clarifying; I am indeed an uninitiated pleb who has been wasting an extra keystroke by typing "bump" to serve that purpose, all these years.
-
Apologies, Claudel. I'm glad no further damage was done. I'm enjoying a cold glass of iced coffee myself at the moment. Nothing hits the spot as well on a miserably hot day.
Cheers!
Right back at you!
I have often thought that the joys of heaven must be truly extraordinary if, as we are assured, no one there ever feels the need for an iced coffee.
-
For the uninitiated, btt means bump this thread.
OK, so "btt" is one less letter typed than "bump", so what is the practical purpose? There is none. It's more practical to type "bump" because that is universally understood.
-
It's more practical to type "bump" because that is universally understood.
It's a bit rash to claim universality for something that didn't exist when a person who is now twenty-five years old was born. Characterizing the term as "far more widely understood" would be closer to the mark. It would also show due consideration for the feelings of the [cough] uninitiated.