Author Topic: White people - your duty to die (Read 3323 times)

Matthew · « **on:** September 05, 2011, 05:29:45 PM »

"You old white people. It is your duty to die."
HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT

Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die. Through love of having children, we are going to take over.

Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over . . .We are here to stay."

Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas ; "We have an aging white America . They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it."

Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California ."

Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . ... I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."

Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California ..."

Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "

s2srea · « **Reply #1 on:** September 07, 2011, 07:08:27 AM »

Obviously these people are anti-Catholic in their viewpoints. I am ashamed that these people have said things like this. There is a population of Hispanics who thinks this way, I'm sure, but, in my experience, the older and simpler generation of, mostly, Mexicans who came here in the 50s, 60s and 70s, legally or illegally, didn't necessarily have this kind of attitude; at least not on a large scale of any sort. It seems to me, that most of these people are intellectuals? I haven't seen this attitude stirred from the grassroots level, but I may be wrong.

I'm curious. You usually cite a source for your articles, where did you get this? And why are there no dates on the quotes I wonder?

trad123 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 07, 2011, 07:39:04 PM »

http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/hispanicleaders.asp

PereJoseph · « **Reply #3 on:** September 07, 2011, 10:08:34 PM »

I think it is silly that people distinguish between "White" and "Hispanic." Where is the Anglic race for the Anglophones ? Spaniards and many Mexicans and South Americans, especially in Argentina, are Indo-Europeans. When did they turn into a different race than Italians and French and Portuguese. Perhaps one day the academic establishment will denote us French of North America as being Gallics, which actually would simplify things considerably, considering that the US government already considers us Acadiens to be a racial "minority" deriving from our ow historic nation. This is accurate, but the application of the term "Hispanic" is not and is meaningless.

That being said, I am of mixed sentiments on the matter of the Mexicanisation of the Southwest of North America. Firstly, I should say that I detest the foreign power of the New England WASPs that has acquired -- whether by legally invalid purchases or outright treachery -- and currently occupies the majority of the continent, with all their immigrants who were only too willing to abandon their heritage for that rotten old false promise of the cultural Protestant's fleshly paradise, the "American Dream." Thus, I welcome the restoration of historically Mexican areas to their proper place, especially California, which will go a long way towards strengthening Mexico and weakening the Yankees. Secondly, however, I want them to stay out of historically French areas, on their side of the Rockies and the Colorado River in Texas. The US is, according to the traditonal way nations have been understood, not a real nation but a kind of ideological military-industrial corporate empire. Insofar as the Mexicans move into this jurisdiction outside of their own historic borders, the nature of their move is unique. I do not want their quarrel to endanger the prospects of my own nation being renewed, nor does it make much sense that it be "white" vs. Mexican. Also, Mexico is no longer Catholic, and any benefit to them moving is more in potency than act.

love alabama · « **Reply #4 on:** September 08, 2011, 02:59:17 PM »

Quote from: PereJoseph

I think it is silly that people distinguish between "White" and "Hispanic." Where is the Anglic race for the Anglophones ? Spaniards and many Mexicans and South Americans, especially in Argentina, are Indo-Europeans. When did they turn into a different race than Italians and French and Portuguese. Perhaps one day the academic establishment will denote us French of North America as being Gallics, which actually would simplify things considerably, considering that the US government already considers us Acadiens to be a racial "minority" deriving from our ow historic nation. This is accurate, but the application of the term "Hispanic" is not and is meaningless.

That being said, I am of mixed sentiments on the matter of the Mexicanisation of the Southwest of North America. Firstly, I should say that I detest the foreign power of the New England WASPs that has acquired -- whether by legally invalid purchases or outright treachery -- and currently occupies the majority of the continent, with all their immigrants who were only too willing to abandon their heritage for that rotten old false promise of the cultural Protestant's fleshly paradise, the "American Dream." Thus, I welcome the restoration of historically Mexican areas to their proper place, especially California, which will go a long way towards strengthening Mexico and weakening the Yankees. Secondly, however, I want them to stay out of historically French areas, on their side of the Rockies and the Colorado River in Texas. The US is, according to the traditonal way nations have been understood, not a real nation but a kind of ideological military-industrial corporate empire. Insofar as the Mexicans move into this jurisdiction outside of their own historic borders, the nature of their move is unique. I do not want their quarrel to endanger the prospects of my own nation being renewed, nor does it make much sense that it be "white" vs. Mexican. Also, Mexico is no longer Catholic, and any benefit to them moving is more in potency than act.

Mexico has alot of whites

Wessex · « **Reply #5 on:** September 23, 2011, 05:36:30 AM »

I heard that the power of the WASPs has waned over the years in that they now defer to Jєωιѕн interests who head the universities, the institutions, professions and big business. And this fact would be reflected no better than in government foreign and economic policies and the effects of the neo-conservative phenomenon which united competing influential groups and their global obsessions.

At the same time you have a massive growth in population mainly from southern migration which will benefit hugely from an eagerness to enfranchise by Obama and greatly advantage his party. Thus, the charade of the two-party system would seem to be an opportunity to downgrade the ageing middle and working class populations of European origin in the face of younger and virile newcomers with great expectations. Maybe this is how nations, civilisations and societies evolve but it would be interesting to know what plans your Hispanic leaders have for the blacks in their new US. Any ideas?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #6 on:** September 23, 2011, 11:37:20 AM »

Quote from: PereJoseph

I think it is silly that people distinguish between "White" and "Hispanic." Where is the Anglic race for the Anglophones ? Spaniards and many Mexicans and South Americans, especially in Argentina, are Indo-Europeans. When did they turn into a different race than Italians and French and Portuguese. Perhaps one day the academic establishment will denote us French of North America as being Gallics, which actually would simplify things considerably, considering that the US government already considers us Acadiens to be a racial "minority" deriving from our ow historic nation. This is accurate, but the application of the term "Hispanic" is not and is meaningless.

A girl who moved to Spain who grew up in Mexico expressed just about the opposite opinion.

There are many whites in South America, but the vast majority has quite a bit of amerindian or black african admixture. If Europe is becoming like Latin America it is because of the importation of minorities.

The term "hispanic" certainly is used to suggest "non-white." When people who pass for white come to English speaking countries from Spanish speaking countries they don't think of themselves as being "hispanic."

Even though "hispanic" is counted as white in crime statistics.

gunfighter · « **Reply #7 on:** September 23, 2011, 12:20:56 PM »

My view has evolved to the point, where I believe the animosity between the groups is engineered. The strings are being pulled to create a cινιℓ ωαr. The system is proving free health care, discounted college, free k-12 education, etc to illegal aliens. It makes no sense, unless it is intended to generate anger against the Mexicans.

On the other side, the Mexicans are being sold on the idea that the gringo stole their land and wealth.

If a war results, martial law would be accepted and welcomed.

roscoe · « **Reply #8 on:** September 23, 2011, 01:29:43 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

"You old white people. It is your duty to die."
HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT

Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die. Through love of having children, we are going to take over.

Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over . . .We are here to stay."

Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas ; "We have an aging white America . They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are ####ting in their pants with fear. I love it."

Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California ."

Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . ... I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."

Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California ..."

Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "

I find it hilarious that many in this Forum refer to moi as 'racist'. These communist mexicans are every bit as much the enemy of Christianity as judaix, moors and nigerians. The above mexicans have no clue what it means to be a true Hispanic or Latin.

s2srea · « **Reply #9 on:** September 23, 2011, 02:35:54 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

I find it hilarious that many in this Forum refer to moi as 'racist'. These communist mexicans are every bit as much the enemy of Christianity as judaix, moors and nigerians. The above mexicans have no clue what it means to be a true Hispanic or Latin.

Another helpful and meaningful contribution.

:smoke-pot:

Matthew · « **Reply #10 on:** September 23, 2011, 02:48:11 PM »

I think some people don't understand the proper use of the Thumbs up/Thumbs down feature.

Take the post that started this thread, for example. A bunch of quotes from men saying that white men should die.

You shouldn't thumbs-down the post if you disagree that "White men should die" --

A thumbs-down means, "No more posts like this one, please!"

while a thumbs-up means, "Thanks for the contribution!"

Even if the contribution is BAD NEWS -- you should thank the member that provided a post that you thought worthwhile -- and if you clicked on it in the first place, there's a good chance it's more or less worthwhile.

Matthew · « **Reply #11 on:** September 23, 2011, 02:51:28 PM »

And while thumbs up/down is linked to poster reputation, you shouldn't focus on who made the post.

Thumbs-up or down on a given post is NOT going to change someone's reputation that much. It was designed that way on purpose.

A person going UP or DOWN in reputation requires a PATTERN or TREND of good/bad posts. One or two posts won't change much.

So you should try to ignore the POSTER'S NAME when judging a post. Even if it's someone you don't like, shouldn't you encourage him/her to make better posts? Everyone can figure out what posts get them positive rep, and which ones get negative rep.

gunfighter · « **Reply #12 on:** September 23, 2011, 02:57:14 PM »

What is the significance of a person's reputation?

Matthew · « **Reply #13 on:** September 23, 2011, 03:28:39 PM »

Quote from: gunfighter

What is the significance of a person's reputation?

It's supposed to be a tool -- a hint -- about how "mainstream" a person is on this board. You know, a way to tell a troll from a long-time quality poster.

I'm just explaining the proper use of the function, aimed at those who follow rules and wish to make things run smoothly/as designed.

s2srea · « **Reply #14 on:** September 23, 2011, 03:36:54 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: gunfighter
What is the significance of a person's reputation?

It's supposed to be a tool -- a hint -- about how "mainstream" a person is on this board. You know, a way to tell a troll from a long-time quality poster.

I'm just explaining the proper use of the function, aimed at those who follow rules and wish to make things run smoothly/as designed.

For what its worth, I'm one of the ones who thumbed you down, and I'm pretty sure I'm following the rules as you intended. :wink: