I think it is silly that people distinguish between "White" and "Hispanic." Where is the Anglic race for the Anglophones ? Spaniards and many Mexicans and South Americans, especially in Argentina, are Indo-Europeans. When did they turn into a different race than Italians and French and Portuguese. Perhaps one day the academic establishment will denote us French of North America as being Gallics, which actually would simplify things considerably, considering that the US government already considers us Acadiens to be a racial "minority" deriving from our ow historic nation. This is accurate, but the application of the term "Hispanic" is not and is meaningless.
That being said, I am of mixed sentiments on the matter of the Mexicanisation of the Southwest of North America. Firstly, I should say that I detest the foreign power of the New England WASPs that has acquired -- whether by legally invalid purchases or outright treachery -- and currently occupies the majority of the continent, with all their immigrants who were only too willing to abandon their heritage for that rotten old false promise of the cultural Protestant's fleshly paradise, the "American Dream." Thus, I welcome the restoration of historically Mexican areas to their proper place, especially California, which will go a long way towards strengthening Mexico and weakening the Yankees. Secondly, however, I want them to stay out of historically French areas, on their side of the Rockies and the Colorado River in Texas. The US is, according to the traditonal way nations have been understood, not a real nation but a kind of ideological military-industrial corporate empire. Insofar as the Mexicans move into this jurisdiction outside of their own historic borders, the nature of their move is unique. I do not want their quarrel to endanger the prospects of my own nation being renewed, nor does it make much sense that it be "white" vs. Mexican. Also, Mexico is no longer Catholic, and any benefit to them moving is more in potency than act.