Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Whats the SSPXs position on cuм ex Apostolatus Officio?  (Read 3345 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Whats the SSPXs position on cuм ex Apostolatus Officio?
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2011, 09:59:39 AM »
Quote from: Jehanne
What caused (again, from the perspective of the SSPX) the docuмent to lose its "canonical directive"?


I believe it has to do with the Code of 1917 -- i.e., once that code became law, cuм ex no longer held.

Whats the SSPXs position on cuм ex Apostolatus Officio?
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2011, 10:28:25 AM »
Quote from: gladius_veritatis
Quote from: Jehanne
What caused (again, from the perspective of the SSPX) the docuмent to lose its "canonical directive"?


I believe it has to do with the Code of 1917 -- i.e., once that code became law, cuм ex no longer held.


Reference?  Is it in the 1917 Code?  The 1983 code abrogated the 1917.


Offline gladius_veritatis

  • Supporter
Whats the SSPXs position on cuм ex Apostolatus Officio?
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2011, 10:33:54 AM »
Do a little digging.  You now have sufficient info...

You could always contact an SSPX priest about the matter...

I have a life to live :)

Whats the SSPXs position on cuм ex Apostolatus Officio?
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2011, 10:38:21 AM »
We all do.  Of course, SSPX priests do not always agree with each other.  I am looking for someone "in the know."  If you do not have time for this, just stop posting.   :bob-marley:

Whats the SSPXs position on cuм ex Apostolatus Officio?
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2011, 10:47:46 AM »
Quote from: Jehanne
Quote from: gladius_veritatis
Quote from: Jehanne
What caused (again, from the perspective of the SSPX) the docuмent to lose its "canonical directive"?


I believe it has to do with the Code of 1917 -- i.e., once that code became law, cuм ex no longer held.


Reference?  Is it in the 1917 Code?


cuм Ex. was quoted as a reference (source) for cn 188.4.

I think we should distinguish in the Bull the eclesiastical laws (penalties etc) from what is of divine law. As far as the first ones is concerned they were all abolished by the code, but with regards to the divine law, they weren´t (they couldn´t actually) be abolished, and cn 188.4 is of divine law, when it says that a non member cannot have ordinary jurisdiction in the Church.



Quote
 The 1983 code abrogated the 1917.


Yes, if you believe JPII was Pope.