So, the reason that God gives these types of gifts sometimes is primarily so that the faithful, His elect, can be prepared for what's to come and also to be comforted that it's all part of God's plan, and that "God wins in the end", that it'll turn out fine. If you're in the middle of some Three Days of Darkness scenario or some horrible Third World War, one might be tempted to despair if it were not for the fact that it had been foretold, and the information about it leaked to some extent.
In this case, if Trump does get taken out in Budapest ... that'll certainly establish Irlmaier's credibility, and then we have just a bit of time left to "duck and cover", and try to make some preparations before all hell breaks loose.
Now, I personally have always felt that 2029 would be the start of the war and physical chastisement (with V2 being the spiritual chastisement, far worse), based on Our Lady's request to consecrate Russia in 1929 (June 13) and then Our Lord likening the delay to that of the Kings of France, who 100 years TO THE DAY of Our Lord having requested that they consecrate Frances to His Sacred Heart were effectively deposed (made subordinate to the Third Estate).
But perhaps this comes before whatever events transpire in 2029. Irlmaier said that he saw something that lasted 3 (units of measure). He didn't think it would be long, but then from eternity 3 Years may not be long. So perhaps another alternative timeline is that the war goes on for about 3 years, which would take us into 2029, at which point a Holy Pope would somehow be elected, who would then consecrate Russia, and crown three kings, one of them being the Great Monarch. That could be possible.
Now, it could also be that the assassination event doesn't actually take place until 2029. Yet, to have two situations after some great Israeli-involved Peace Deal where there's a short-notice summit in Budapest between the US and Russia ... that would be uncanny.
I would have doubted the blog post about this detail regarding the Budapest summit and assassination of the US President, except that this had been written many years ago, and I quoted it on one of these Irlmaier threads two years ago. So it wasn't something that someone has faked when news of the Budapest summit came out and then tried to claim this prediction had been made years ago.
Too many of Irlmaier's predictions have come true to write it off as blind squirrel or broken clock luck, and, as mentioned, what are the odds of these things all coming together in a short window of time, where everyone's crying peace, Shalom! (the great "Eternal Peace" deal that the entire world hailed), and then a short-notice summit (two weeks' notice -- how often do things like that get arranged on such short notice?), then it's in Budapest (as predicted, the Bucharest alternative notwithstanding), and it's between US and Russia, and the actual US President is attending (most of them time it's some delegate, Secretary of State, ambassador, or some such)? I mean, if Irlmaier was just making up random things, what are odds of these all coming together? Likely astronomical. Now, if you wanted to claim he was under diabolical influence ... apart from the fact that it would be a slander against his character for which there's no evidence, that might at least explain it, but dumb luck? As mentioned, I cited these predictions two years ago here on CI, and the blog itself came from years before that, so its existence prior to the events is well established. Odds are astronomical that things would line up this way.
Topic: What to make of Alois Irlmaier (Read 126152 times)