Author Topic: What Every Jєω (and Non-Jєω) Should Know (Read 629 times)

Quo Vadis Petre · « **Reply #2 on:** July 25, 2007, 11:01:56 AM »

Quote from: dust-7

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre

Certainly the role of Jєωιѕн Rothschild agents in advocating for the Iraq war and an attack on Iran is consistent with the profile above.

There's another possibility. Saddam might also have been under UN sanction, with no-fly zones, and a duty to report any WMD, allow inspections, and refrain from both developing further weapons and encouraging terrorism or direct attack as he did against Kuwait. Failing in all that, UN resolutions were finally enforced, even though too many on the council had conflicts of interest, including Anan and his family - making money off kickbacks in Iraq.

As for Iran, they are currently at war with the US and those Allies that assisted. Iranian munitions and forces pour across the border. And suspicions grow that the present Iraqi government is little more than a puppet of Tehran.

So does Iran fall? Probably not before the '08 elections, unless they wish to accelerate that timetable. But the war is on. And the only way to stop a nation supplying ιnѕυrrєcтισnists, is to stop that nation, directly.

That, sir, is where you are wrong.

Saudis' role in Iraq insurgency outlined

Brief summary from the URL:

Sunni extremists from Saudi Arabia make up half the foreign fighters in Iraq, many ѕυιcιdє bombers, a U.S. official says.

dust-7 · « **Reply #3 on:** July 25, 2007, 08:43:05 PM »

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre

Sunni extremists from Saudi Arabia make up half the foreign fighters in Iraq, many ѕυιcιdє bombers, a U.S. official says.

Well, I don't know what a 'fighter' is. I've seen the leftist establishment embrace that term, as they have the word - homeland. It makes my skin crawl.

I think what you mean is a soldier, mercenary or not, spy or a terrorist. And I have no doubt that you are right. And I said that others forces were easily crossing the borders. But the present government appears to be a little too cozy with Tehran and those weapons and soldiers pouring over the border. And the recent fights have seen the Sunnis team up to get after elements of Al Queda, while other conflicts still seem to involve the radical Shi'ites, heavily supported by Iran.

I'm not saying the Sunnis Muslims are suddenly the 'good guys'. It doesn't matter. A stable and responsible government must justly govern them, as the Shi'ite, as the Kurd, and anyone else, including the sects heretical of Catholicism, most of which have been physically driven out as I understand it by zealous Muslims.

Vandaler · « **Reply #4 on:** July 26, 2007, 05:59:00 AM »

Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre

That, sir, is where you are wrong.

Brief summary from the URL:

Sunni extremists from Saudi Arabia make up half the foreign fighters in Iraq, many ѕυιcιdє bombers, a U.S. official says.

Saudi's role in supporting the Sunni's is in no way incompatible with the notion that Iran plays a large role in the violence in Iraq.

It's no wonder that the U.S. is currently in negotiations with Iran over Iraq. The U.S. readily acknowledge that they will never be able to pullout of Iraq without an agreement with Iran on the fabric of a new Iraq Government (percentage of Shia power over Sunni). What are they negotiating exactly if Iran is not presently directly involved in influencing, funding and arming powerful Shia Militia's and death squads.