Author Topic: We never went to the Moon - proof (Read 11974 times)

Croix de Fer · « **Reply #5 on:** May 28, 2016, 02:13:00 PM »

I wonder if geddeg is Icterus (a banned previous CathInfo member)?

He posts and comments on a lot of the same issues as Icterus, and despite geddeg's deliberate grammar mistakes (not capitalizing the beginning of sentences) as a means to throw off the observer, the writing style is similar.

:detective:

Matthew · « **Reply #6 on:** May 28, 2016, 10:45:53 PM »

Funny how Hollywood always likes to leak their secret by means of movies.

Remember the movie Wag the Dog?

Now I find out there was a movie about a faked landing in 1977.

"Capricorn One"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077294/

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #7 on:** May 29, 2016, 07:12:20 AM »

Fascinating. Thumbs up on this one. No idea what to believe these days.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #8 on:** May 29, 2016, 08:40:33 AM »

I wondered about the Van Allen belt that lead me to doubt the so called moon
landing and walk of 1969.
I remember watching the moon walk on live TV and remembered a discussion
of the Van Allen Radiation Belt in a High School Science class earlier in the decade
of the 1960's. That Man cannot ever go to the moon nor any other planet.
Because it is not possible.

From Wikipedia is more on the Van Allen belt:

Van Allen radiation belt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
File:Van Allen Belts.ogv
This video illustrates changes in the shape and intensity of a cross section of the Van Allen belts

Van Allen radiation belts (cross section)
A radiation belt is a layer of energetic charged particles that is held in place around a magnetized planet, such as the Earth, by the planet's magnetic field. The Earth has two such belts and sometimes others may be temporarily created. The discovery of the belts is credited to James Van Allen, and as a result the Earth's belts are known as the Van Allen belts. The main belts extend from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000 kilometers above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar wind and other particles by cosmic rays.[1] The belts are located in the inner region of the Earth's magnetosphere. The belts contain energetic electrons and protons. Other nuclei, such as alpha particles, are less prevalent. The belts endanger satellites, which must protect their sensitive components with adequate shielding if they spend significant time in the radiation belts. In 2013, NASA reported that the Van Allen Probes had discovered a transient, third radiation belt, which was observed for four weeks until destroyed by a powerful, interplanetary shock wave from the Sun.[2]

Matthew · « **Reply #9 on:** May 29, 2016, 09:10:29 AM »

I like how one of the videos ended (I think it was the video I posted in the OP):

The narrator said that SCIENCE dictates that we discard the so-called "moon landings" as an aberration.

They haven't been duplicated, not even a fraction of what was accomplished, in 45 years!

What should a scientist think of data like this:

300, 250, 300, 300, 250, 240000, 300, 300, 250, 300, 300, 250, 300, 300, 250, 300, 300, 250, 300, 300, 250, 300, (many hundreds of times)...

That "240000" datum was obviously a mistake!

Those numbers represent how far from the earth our astronauts have traveled -- always to low earth orbit. All the missions took place there (Skylab, ISS, Mir, Space Shuttle, etc.) The moon, however, is 240,000 miles away.

He mentioned that the Wright Brothers, Charles Lindbergh, Sputnik, ALL those breakthroughs were followed up with many more like it. We didn't go 45 years without an airplane taking off. And look how many rocket launches into low earth orbit we've had since Sputnik!

Also, look at the Apollo missions -- we supposedly went to the moon several times, the missions often being just months apart. Going to the Moon is no big deal apparently! But now it's such a big deal that NO COUNTRY has gone there in 45 years? That doesn't make sense.

It also doesn't make sense that they haven't done it in over a generation. You can't say that "the people" are sick of Moon landings, any more than you can leave CathInfo because of "the membership" and stay gone for 5 years.

That is because "the people" completely change over the years. How many men and women can honestly say they're tired of news coverage about men on the moon? Why don't they send the first woman to the moon? Huh? Wouldn't that be a nice liberal breakthrough?

Anyone under 55 can't even remember the "moon landings". And that's a heck of a lot of people! Isn't NASA worried about an intellectual "brain drain" since effectively we never did it? How can they claim to have "experience" when every last person in the place has never been involved in a manned Moon mission? Experience doesn't reside in the walls of NASA or its computers. It resides in the PEOPLE who work there. Do they really have a bunch of 80 and 90 year olds working there as consultants in case they want to go back to the Moon again?

Because a 55 year old might remember seeing the Moon Landing on TV, but he was only 8 years old in 1969! Then men who worked at NASA at the time, including all the astronauts, were certainly much older.