Another very SHORT video showing we never went to the moon. The words to the song are telling as you watch the NASA nonsense.

Another shorter video proving beyond doubt that satellites do not exist.

Here's wishing CathInfo members, readers, and of course its owner-moderator, a happy 50th anniversary ^[*] of the Landing on the Moon by the U.S. lunar-lander Eagle of Apollo 11.

I also "lived through the time".  I definitely do not believed that the Moon Landing was faked. 

Having "lived through the time" of (Free - masonic) NASA's great psy op means only that those of us who "lived through the time" are more brainwashed than those who did not.
Only those who, with an open mind, have examined both sides of the issue, are competent to give an INFORMED opinion. Uninformed opinions tend to provide support only for the success of a psy op.

Overall interesting. Seems the originator of this conspiracy theory doesn't seem very credible.

I'm not that hard on Kaysing, who is what the above clip was about. Sibrel is dishonest, though, and it's difficult not to think Sibrel is a con man.

Kaysing was a writer. He wrote on a lot of different topics. Motorcycling, a survival manual, travel books, and a cookbook. Price Stern Sloan (PSS) was a publisher of humor and parody works, and apparently in 1974, they agreed with Kaysing to write a satire on the moon landings and gave him a small advance. When they saw his manuscript, they called it a collection of notes and said it didn't work out. (A letter from PSS to that effect is in the book he eventually self-published.)

What seems to have happened is that he started to believe the stuff he was creating - that was supposed to be parody/satire. Although he did work as a technical writer, he really had no technical expertise. People with no technical training can sometimes get lost in narratives about technology that are disconnected from reality. I know a few other people with humanities backgrounds who similarly got lost. Most of these people have English degrees, like Kaysing, and I suspect that's significant. (However, I may have a selection bias because I know a lot more people with degrees in English or comparative literature degrees than with degrees in philosophy or art or another humanity.)

21^st Century Wired posted an article in 2015 that I found very interesting, and it seems to reinforce the position that I and millions of others take. https://21stcenturywire.com/2015/03/14/video-nasas-orion-engineer-admits-they-cant-get-past-van-allen-radiation-belts/

The article quotes from a NASA Orion engineer (‘Jack Armstrong’), whose slick video has already been posted. So I’ll not put it up again. Those who do “science stuff” can go back and look at it if they’re interested.

There's another NASA guy does videos regularly. He likes to do them in a deep forest setting for some reason.  In one of these videos, (at least), he discusses the Van Allen Belts, and explains how the original Apollo astronauts, on six separate missions, from 1969 to Dec. 1972, got through these belts successfully, going and coming, a collective, whopping 12 times. I mean, talk about what NASA could do with relatively weak Apollo technology, which has since been discarded, i.e. lost? mislaid? in the trash out in back? Who knows? In any case, Orion will make future space travel and exploration a slam dunk.

This fellow takes us through the structural make up of the VA Belts. They’re highly charged particles, e.g. alpha particles, beta particles, electrons, free protons, etc. Very dangerous and potentially lethal stuff. They surround earth, in a high state of flux, depending upon the sun’s activity and a wide variety of other factors. These particles take the shape of two donut-shaped electro-magneic belts, held somewhat close by the earth’s molten iron core. At times, during especially active periods of the sun, a third belt will appear.

I think, generally speaking,I have only a stupid Goy’s understanding of this particular explanation of space science Kabbalah. But that’s all the “science stuff” I plan to do today. It’s so exhausting.

Anyway, this NASA guy points to areas in the Van Allen Belts which contain lower amounts of dangerous radiation. The trick is to find those regions of weaker activity, and barrel through them quickly. That’s what the Apollo capsules did, so says this NASA spokesman.

Yep, using football terminology, the NASA offense juked and jived, Barry Sanders-like, through the Van Allen defense. No one laid a hand on them. Then they came back up the field and did the same thing, 12 times in all. It was a complete rout of the Van Allen Team.

If you believe this story, then you probably believe that Francis is Catholic, and that the New Mass is an improvement upon the Old.

Not every wacky conspiracy theory is science-based so the problem isn’t an inability to work through the equations, etc.  The problem as you say is fear but also it is an inability to make good judgments about who is worthy of trust. Kaysing isn’t trustworthy.  Sribel isn’t trustworthy.  That isn’t to say that the status quo is always correct.  But any theory which requires us to believe that many thousands of otherwise upstanding people are maliciously lying is a non-starter for me.  That’s not a credible position.

If on the other hand you can show that the existing evidence is being misinterpreted, that’s a completely different situation.  I think evolution is a scientific hoax not because all the scientists are lying but because they have been trained to misinterpret the evidence.  That’s completely different from accusing all the astronauts and nasa engineers and management of being malicious liars.  The theory is complete BS.  Same thing with flat earth.  Everyone isn’t lying.  If your pet theory requires belief that everyone is lying, it’s a sure sign that it is a false theory.