This argument again 

Get used to it, as it appears every time I post a Vigano epistle, Miser is going to whine about him not condemning Trump for the vax.

It is irritating to have her continually and immediately derail them, but its a largely unmoderated forum, and it is what it is.

She isn't condemning sede clergy (RCI, others) for this but just goes after Vigano hmmmmm. Most sede clergy that are against the vaccine still support Trump. Will she condemn these priests too because they fail the purity test? Maybe these priests are NWO installed too 

+Vigano:

• How and when did communistic infiltrators get a foothold in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church?

WHEN:  October 28, 1958, when they replaced the legitimate Catholic pope with Komrad Roncalli.
HOW:  answer above, by replacing Siri with Roncalli.

Of course, they spent many decades infiltrating the hierarchy to get Cardinal agents inside the conclave, but this was the pivotal day in Church history.

Plus, there’s not a word about aliens, proving he believes in them!

Moreover, there’s nothing here about omelettes!

Why, there’s TONS of other things this letter doesn’t cover (a sure sign of Opus Dei marrano’ism)!!!!!!!!

You responded almost identically here before I got down to your post.  He doesn't mention lots of things, as US politics wasn't really his focus here.  Didn't mention Joe Biden either, which should be interpreted as support for Biden.

If you want to attack some other speech / writing / interview where he excessively praises Trump, that's fine, but that has nothing to do with this interview here.

I've addressed this criticism before.

1) What would you have him do?  Start ordaining priests and bishops ... when there are a half dozen or more Trad groups already doing that?

2) You underestimate the power of +Vigano's writing.  He's emboldening more and more of the conservative Conciliar fence-sitters who used to hold their tongue out of misplaced "respect" for the Conciliar hierarchy, to start criticizing and attacking Bergoglio and to waking up about the true nature of the Crisis (not just a misinterpretation of Vatican II with their go-to "hermeneutic of continuity").  That "hermeneutic of continuity" was always what these types hid behind to apologize for V2.

1) I think that’s an excellent idea! Shows the modernists that he means business and is a blistering threat to their hegemony which would make people take him more seriously. Another SSPX would make the Vatican apostates lose sleep and scramble like headless chickens. 

2) Sure. I don’t disagree. 

2) You underestimate the power of +Vigano's writing.  He's emboldening more and more of the conservative Conciliar fence-sitters who used to hold their tongue out of misplaced "respect" for the Conciliar hierarchy, to start criticizing and attacking Bergoglio and to waking up about the true nature of the Crisis (not just a misinterpretation of Vatican II with their go-to "hermeneutic of continuity").  That "hermeneutic of continuity" was always what these types hid behind to apologize for V2.

Agree completely.

The pen is mightier than the sword, and Vigano’s in particular.

Men were ill-disposed to listen to Lefebvre, unable to get past the censure and canonical issues, but Vigano does not carry that baggage (yet).  Bergoglio screwed up in that regard.

Consequently, as Lad says, he’s able to reach neoconservatives where Lefebvre couldn’t, and is presently the only man capable of uniting resistance against DeepChurch at the present time (and the first since early Lefebvre to do it since the council).

Eventually, with enough exposure to Vigano, doctrine will regain/retake supremacy over canonical considerations amidst this protracted state of necessity, and if that happens neocons become traditionalists in droves, threatening the very foundations of conciliarism.

All the Resistance loves him.

Almost all the sedes do too.

And I suspect there are a good number of Nicodemus’s in the SSPX and indult orbits as well (who, because of their desire for unity with conciliar Rome lack the courage to say so).