Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Fighting Errors in the Modern World => Topic started by: Matthew on April 27, 2021, 03:43:22 PM

Title: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Matthew on April 27, 2021, 03:43:22 PM
I'm no stranger to the Red Pill; I've been a Trad Catholic since birth and I'm well aware of all the major true cօռspιʀαcιҽs, including the infiltration of the Church. I've been in opposition to the mainstream and the modern world since I can remember.
I am completely woke (not the right word, I know!) about the CÖVÌD scamdemic. I don't wear a mask. Death rather than CÖVÌD pseudo-ναccιnє (I'm going to call it "vax" for short).

And anyone who knows me knows that I'm a long-time doomer. I've been seriously prepping for at least 15 years.

AND YET...

I don't see how it's possible for all this bad news to be true, about the vaxxed harming the un-vaxxed through shedding spiked proteins. It's TOO MUCH. This Doom is so hardcore, it doesn't even allow for enough survival for the Time of Peace and the Antichrist to arrive. Considering the situation:

- 1/3 to 1/2 of the country has taken or will take the pseudo-vax. Most of those are in the "has taken" category. We're talking full coverage. You go to the grocery store, roughly 1/3 of the people walking around are contaminated by the vax.
- The vax is likely to cause cytokine storm/death in many of the vaxxed during the next iteration of the virus -- a.k.a. the next Flu season -- this is apocalyptic enough! Think of all the holes in the economy when the vaxxed start dropping like flies
- If just 1/2 of 1% of the vaxxed started dying in the next flu season, the bad guys would have all the excuse, I mean "evidence", they need that "the non-vaxxed are a problem" and/or "we have a killer new variant of CÖVÌD" to implement full ƈσmmυɳιsm, with confiscation of private property, round-ups into camps, the whole enchilada. Just look at the measures taken to contain the BIG YAWN CÖVÌD-19, in which old people died and deaths were on par with a normal flu season.
- The vax almost certainly prevents reproduction in vaxxed females
- Virtually 100% of Americans are NOT self-sufficient. But that is a huge understatement. Over 99% aren't even 1% self-sufficient.
- The effects of the vax are permanent in those who receive it. So those with 2 weeks or 2 years food supply are just as screwed as those with a 1-day food supply, unless they can produce 100% of their own food.

So we were pretty much screwed already. But now all these stories are going around about the vaxxed shedding spiked proteins which cause harm to the un-vaxxed, as if to say "All you who aren't taking the ναccιnє -- you're not safe either! Even though you live in a bunker, with all sorts of defensive equipment, on 100 acres of farmland all set up with barns, outbuildings, lots of farm animals, mature trees/bushes producing food, YOU AREN'T SAFE EITHER!"

Call me crazy, but none of us were sitting pretty before. ƈσmmυɳιsm was already just months or a few years away. Most of us (including me) had accepted that. And now people are saying, "Break out of your pleasant slumber. Time to wake up and smell the coffee. It's much worse than you thought!"

My question is -- is that even possible?

How can we have a chastisement, period of peace (which means SURVIVORS) for maybe 30-40 years, then a final fall into a worse state which makes 2010 look like the High Middle Ages of Christendom -- followed by the Antichrist and the End of the World/End of Time?

Are we really just a few years or months from the End of Time? If there's any truth to this spike protein thing, it would seem so.
Unless God steps in and heals the fools who took the injection...
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: josefamenendez on April 27, 2021, 04:15:37 PM
Noah's flood wasn't the end of the world either.....
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Matto on April 27, 2021, 04:18:45 PM
Are we really just a few decades from the End of Time?

Decades? Don't you mean months?
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Matthew on April 27, 2021, 04:20:58 PM
Noah's flood wasn't the end of the world either.....
So... the world is going to be completely destroyed, with the human race reduced to under 20 individuals again? -- because that's about the level of the disaster we're looking at, if even 2% of this spike protein shedding thing turns out to be true.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Matthew on April 27, 2021, 04:21:24 PM
Decades? Don't you mean months?
Yeah, I should have said "years or even months".
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: josefamenendez on April 27, 2021, 04:24:00 PM
So... the human race is about to be reduced to under 20 individuals again -- that's about the level of the disaster, if true.
Not necessarily, but there is precedent
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Matthew on April 27, 2021, 05:06:00 PM
I guess what I'm saying is, this is giving me deja-vu with the situation in the Traditional Catholic world.

Me: The Freemasons infiltrated the Church and completely took over in the 1960's, mutating the Church into an organization with their own teachings and ideals. Faithful Catholics are like sheep without a shepherd, confused and isolated, and have to drive far to get to a Tridentine Mass -- and that was before 2012. But now the largest bulwark of Tradition, the SSPX, is rapidly falling to Modernism and is accepting Vatican II and the Conciliar Church -- causing much more isolation, even longer drive times, and in many cases, the Faithful HAVE NO OPTION for Mass within a 6-hour drive of their location.

Dogmatic Home-aloner Trad: You call that doom? Hold my beer.
Let me tell you about antipope Pius X, or should I say Mr. Sarto, who was a Freemasonic plant, and how the Crisis in the Church actually began in the 1500s...
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: NaomhAdhamhnan on April 27, 2021, 05:15:38 PM
My main concern is that there will be no serious fall-out from the vaccine for a number of years, and then suddenly in five years time it takes effect. I'm not sure I can keep my sanity much longer. If this lockdown and vaccine madness, fake economic boom, Green economy, Bitcoin millionaire, tranny school-teacher, Mass illegal (Ireland) world rolls on much longer without any consequences being felt I'm going to properly lose my mind. 
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Ladislaus on April 27, 2021, 05:24:55 PM
If ... [this] world rolls on much longer without any consequences being felt I'm going to properly lose my mind.

I'm the same way.  This insanely evil and demonic world is demoralizing, where good is called evil and evil good.  I hope that the chastisement comes soon to cleanse this place.  If it takes me with it, then so be it, but I don't know how much longer I can take seeing this anymore.  I'd love to be hidden away in a monastery somewhere that the outside world barely exists.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Ladislaus on April 27, 2021, 05:26:24 PM
I don't believe that this shedding is much worse than just actually getting COVID.  It's those spike proteins that cause the COVID symptoms.  So it's still orders of magnitude different than having your body continually producing these things.  Without the mRNA stuff in your system, the natural immune system SHOULD just take care of the foreign invaders.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: gladius_veritatis on April 27, 2021, 05:59:31 PM
I'd love to be hidden away in a monastery somewhere that the outside world barely exists.

Agreed. If only you could be reasonably certain such a place was orthodox, would remain so, etc.  

Nothing solid remains, God excepted.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 007 on April 27, 2021, 06:29:56 PM
We still have it to easy, It needs to get desperate hopeless before man will make a change.
And that is coming quickly. 
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: RHR 42 bpm on April 27, 2021, 07:10:00 PM
Why should God step in and purge His enemies, if Catholics aren't willing to risk dying or being jailed to uphold Christ's kingship? 

Catholics are a bunch of LARPs and cowards. 

The world may continue in a sludge of misery as punishment from God. A Chastisement would actually be an act of mercy.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Last Tradhican on April 27, 2021, 07:16:26 PM

I don't believe that this shedding is much worse than just actually getting CÖVÌD.  It's those spike proteins that cause the CÖVÌD symptoms.  So it's still orders of magnitude different than having your body continually producing these things.  Without the mRNA stuff in your system, the natural immune system SHOULD just take care of the foreign invaders.
That is exactly my thinking.

St. Augustine said to take action as if everything depends on you, but pray very much because everything depends on God.

My action is to not take the shot, and avoid as much as possible people who have had the shot, for at least 6 weeks after they have the second shot. This is nothing new, my grandfather taught me to avoid sick people. I do not go to doctors offices or hospitals unless there is no choice. If I am sick or feeling off, I do not go to mass or anyone's house. If someone invites me to their house and they are sick, I excuse myself and leave. I eat good food and take some vitamins, work outdoors, in other words, I live a healthy lifestyle.  I go to mass and the sacraments and LIVE the Catholic faith. As to the rest, I let God sort it out.

No one gets sick or dies without God allowing it for our own good. "Hope in God, for I will still give praise to him : the salvation of my countenance, and my God".
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Struthio on April 27, 2021, 07:41:19 PM
I'm no stranger to the Red Pill; I've been a Trad Catholic since birth and I'm well aware of all the major true cօռspιʀαcιҽs, including the infiltration of the Church. I've been in opposition to the mainstream and the modern world since I can remember.
I am completely woke (not the right word, I know!) about the CÖVÌD scamdemic. I don't wear a mask. Death rather than CÖVÌD pseudo-ναccιnє (I'm going to call it "vax" for short).

And anyone who knows me knows that I'm a long-time doomer. I've been seriously prepping for at least 15 years.

AND YET...

I don't see how it's possible for all this bad news to be true, about the vaxxed harming the un-vaxxed through shedding spiked proteins. It's TOO MUCH. This Doom is so hardcore, it doesn't even allow for enough survival for the Time of Peace and the Antichrist to arrive. Considering the situation:

- 1/3 to 1/2 of the country has taken or will take the pseudo-vax. Most of those are in the "has taken" category. We're talking full coverage. You go to the grocery store, roughly 1/3 of the people walking around are contaminated by the vax.
- The vax is likely to cause cytokine storm/death in many of the vaxxed during the next iteration of the virus -- a.k.a. the next Flu season -- this is apocalyptic enough! Think of all the holes in the economy when the vaxxed start dropping like flies
- If just 1/2 of 1% of the vaxxed started dying in the next flu season, the bad guys would have all the excuse, I mean "evidence", they need that "the non-vaxxed are a problem" and/or "we have a killer new variant of CÖVÌD" to implement full ƈσmmυɳιsm, with confiscation of private property, round-ups into camps, the whole enchilada. Just look at the measures taken to contain the BIG YAWN CÖVÌD-19, in which old people died and deaths were on par with a normal flu season.
- The vax almost certainly prevents reproduction in vaxxed females
- Virtually 100% of Americans are NOT self-sufficient. But that is a huge understatement. Over 99% aren't even 1% self-sufficient.
- The effects of the vax are permanent in those who receive it. So those with 2 weeks or 2 years food supply are just as screwed as those with a 1-day food supply, unless they can produce 100% of their own food.

So we were pretty much screwed already. But now all these stories are going around about the vaxxed shedding spiked proteins which cause harm to the un-vaxxed, as if to say "All you who aren't taking the ναccιnє -- you're not safe either! Even though you live in a bunker, with all sorts of defensive equipment, on 100 acres of farmland all set up with barns, outbuildings, lots of farm animals, mature trees/bushes producing food, YOU AREN'T SAFE EITHER!"

Call me crazy, but none of us were sitting pretty before. ƈσmmυɳιsm was already just months or a few years away. Most of us (including me) had accepted that. And now people are saying, "Break out of your pleasant slumber. Time to wake up and smell the coffee. It's much worse than you thought!"

My question is -- is that even possible?

How can we have a chastisement, period of peace (which means SURVIVORS) for maybe 30-40 years, then a final fall into a worse state which makes 2010 look like the High Middle Ages of Christendom -- followed by the Antichrist and the End of the World/End of Time?

Are we really just a few years or months from the End of Time? If there's any truth to this spike protein thing, it would seem so.
Unless God steps in and heals the fools who took the injection...

That spike protein thing so far is just an hypothesis which may or may not be true. And even if it was the case, none has an idea about what kind of and how much damage it may cause.

Personally, I don't believe that it is the intention of TPTB to murder masses of people. I believe they prefer sterilization, though they themselves may not be aware of all side effects.


With respect to the time of the consummation of the age, I believe that we're in it, and that it will happily end soon. Rough estimation: One generation or 70 babylonian years counted from 1970 (or maybe 1965). But as far as i studied the Fathers, this time of tribulation is not about being starved to death or jabbed or something, but about being seduced to back off of the true faith and follow the last Antichrist (IMHO the Conciliar Church) or any lesser Antichrist calling elsewhere.


Listen to your compatriot Donald Hugh Henley from Gilmer TX. He sounds well informed: So I called up the Captain "Please bring me my wine" He said, "We haven't had that spirit here since 1969"
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Yeti on April 27, 2021, 08:16:41 PM
I really don't have nearly as pessimistic a view as you do, Matthew. You were only able to get to the conclusions you draw in this thread by assuming the worst possible outcome of every single feature of this situation, even the ones that we don't even know are true. If you do that in any situation, you'll end up thinking something pretty bad is going to happen. But reality is usually a mixture of good and bad.
.
For example, you assume a 100% sterilization rate for women who are injected. I don't believe such a thing will happen. I do agree that Bill Gates wants to reduce the global population, but that doesn't even remotely equate to a vaccine that sterilizes everyone who gets it.
.
A lot of the other ideas associated with the vaccine, such as cytokine storms, impaired immune systems, vulnerability to other coronaviruses, and so on, seem plausible when taken individually, but at this point are little more than speculation. Most of the evidence of people getting sick or dying or having other problems from the vaccine is anecdotal because it's very hard to say for sure in any individual case whether the vaccine was the cause.
.
As far as unvaxxed getting reactions, I'm pretty skeptical of that. Just because someone gets a bloody nose doesn't mean a whole lot in itself. I'm sure with time this situation will become more clear. In any case, I'm highly skeptical of the idea that you can pick up a condition like this just by walking past someone in a grocery store. I'm not a doctor, but I'm just not going to believe it unless I see truly impressive proof. It sounds as crazy to me as saying you can catch the virus itself by walking past someone in a grocery store, another idea that was debunked a long time ago.
.
It's waaaay too early in this situation to say anything for sure. I think it's a much better idea to sit tight and wait and see what happens.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Yeti on April 27, 2021, 08:22:10 PM
My main point, which I forgot to mention, is that I am almost certain the goal here is not to kill a major chunk of the human race within the next few years. I think such an outcome would in fact be extremely harmful to the ruling elite, as it would destabilize society to the point of creating a Mad Max world, or a world like you see in your typical zombie movie. Sorry, Matthew, you don't strike me as a movie buff type of guy,  :laugh1: but if you want to know what I'm talking about just watch a standard zombie flick like I am Legend or Dawn of the Dead and tell me how much power Bill Gates or any, um, ethnic group would have in a society where there is that level of chaos.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: DigitalLogos on April 27, 2021, 09:21:28 PM
I really don't have nearly as pessimistic a view as you do, Matthew. You were only able to get to the conclusions you draw in this thread by assuming the worst possible outcome of every single feature of this situation, even the ones that we don't even know are true. If you do that in any situation, you'll end up thinking something pretty bad is going to happen. But reality is usually a mixture of good and bad.
.
For example, you assume a 100% sterilization rate for women who are injected. I don't believe such a thing will happen. I do agree that вιℓℓ gαтeѕ wants to reduce the global population, but that doesn't even remotely equate to a ναccιnє that sterilizes everyone who gets it.
.
A lot of the other ideas associated with the ναccιnє, such as cytokine storms, impaired immune systems, vulnerability to other cσɾσnαvιɾυses, and so on, seem plausible when taken individually, but at this point are little more than speculation. Most of the evidence of people getting sick or dying or having other problems from the ναccιnє is anecdotal because it's very hard to say for sure in any individual case whether the ναccιnє was the cause.
.
As far as unvaxxed getting reactions, I'm pretty skeptical of that. Just because someone gets a bloody nose doesn't mean a whole lot in itself. I'm sure with time this situation will become more clear. In any case, I'm highly skeptical of the idea that you can pick up a condition like this just by walking past someone in a grocery store. I'm not a doctor, but I'm just not going to believe it unless I see truly impressive proof. It sounds as crazy to me as saying you can catch the virus itself by walking past someone in a grocery store, another idea that was debunked a long time ago.
.
It's waaaay too early in this situation to say anything for sure. I think it's a much better idea to sit tight and wait and see what happens.
As easy as it is to cave into the fear-mongering associated with this information, I agree with you on the matter. In particular, the concerns about having a reaction through exposure to those "vaxxed" appear to have their basis in close, consistent contact rather than just brushing by someone at the store. I recall the panel that was shared in a different thread, and how these contagious reactions pertained to those living together rather than common strangers. Furthermore, given the size of the population that has taken these shots is extremely large and the adverse reactions (thus far) are comparatively few, just like Covid over the past year. There's also the consideration that the spike proteins (provided they are not in fact the "folded proteins" known as prions) will most likely be combated by our immune systems, leaving a negligible impact on the unvaxxed population.
Does that mean I don't think there's a larger game at play here? Of course not. Most certainly there's an evil end to all of this, but what that end looks like is difficult to tell. I pray that things will not be so severe as they are speculated to be.
I was feeling pretty down yesterday after watching the latest Computing Forever video on the totalitarian aims of this situation, but, I remembered that all things happen only by God's Will. It's easy to look at the evil and forget about the Eternal Goodness of God. Satan wants you to fixate on the darkness and despair. Try not to forget that God will steer this in a direction according to His Will, ultimately to that of the Good. So just pray, pray, pray for final perseverance and trust in God's Will. And, if you die, well, hope for salvific grace and accept it as the end of your story.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: B from A on April 27, 2021, 09:39:14 PM

 In any case, I'm highly skeptical of the idea that you can pick up a condition like this just by walking past someone in a grocery store. 
... the concerns about having a reaction through exposure to those "vaxxed" appear to have their basis in close, consistent contact rather than just brushing by someone at the store. ... these contagious reactions pertained to those living together rather than common strangers. 
This.  No one (that I've seen) is saying you pick it up by walking past someone at a grocery story.  
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: B from A on April 27, 2021, 09:48:57 PM
I've also been seeing examples of nursing mothers noticing effects in their babies.  
[I'm not sure I totally understand the following.]

(https://scontent-iad3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/179495907_10208696219521068_4880746515953533242_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=vNnvdUWJ_hcAX8_-AK_&_nc_oc=AQnRVDU48xJXVRT7hCrzWSsktos-Fcei0_bQ48Xq4wQqLrml9lfb4mYp5jdM2E0cRWw&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-2.xx&oh=eb915bd224c7970a9ca8f6639dae3c8f&oe=60ACB331)
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: B from A on April 27, 2021, 10:23:03 PM
I've also been seeing examples of nursing mothers noticing effects in their babies.  
[I'm not sure I totally understand the following.]

(https://scontent-iad3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/179495907_10208696219521068_4880746515953533242_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&ccb=1-3&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=vNnvdUWJ_hcAX8_-AK_&_nc_oc=AQnRVDU48xJXVRT7hCrzWSsktos-Fcei0_bQ48Xq4wQqLrml9lfb4mYp5jdM2E0cRWw&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-2.xx&oh=eb915bd224c7970a9ca8f6639dae3c8f&oe=60ACB331)
p.s. I have no way to verify this particular post^, but I've seen many other testimonials of nursing mothers noticing reactions in their babies.  
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 06:20:37 AM
My main point, which I forgot to mention, is that I am almost certain the goal here is not to kill a major chunk of the human race within the next few years. I think such an outcome would in fact be extremely harmful to the ruling elite, as it would destabilize society to the point of creating a Mad Max world, or a world like you see in your typical zombie movie. Sorry, Matthew, you don't strike me as a movie buff type of guy,  :laugh1: but if you want to know what I'm talking about just watch a standard zombie flick like I am Legend or Dawn of the Dead and tell me how much power вιℓℓ gαтeѕ or any, um, ethnic group would have in a society where there is that level of chaos.
Agreed.  This isn't about murder.  It's about control through fear.  And I would add that control through fear can happen on both sides.  
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: SeanJohnson on April 28, 2021, 06:48:46 AM
Can someone point me toward a succinct article presenting the theory that the vaxed can infect the unvaxed?
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: SeanJohnson on April 28, 2021, 06:59:45 AM
Can someone point me toward a succinct article presenting the theory that the vaxed can infect the unvaxed?
Disregard.  I found this posted by Incred in another thread:

Can ναccιnαted people make the unναccιnαted sick? Watch Dr Palevsky explain
April 21, 2021

Mordechai Sones



Dr. Lawrence Palevsky spoke in an interview about the mechanics of spike protein shedding: “When studies are done on injections that are thought to be ναccιnє, we sometimes need 7, 10, or even 15 years to really understand what the injection does to the body, and what it does to those around us.
“And so, there's automatically this assumption that when the authorities say these injections are safe, that we actually have adequate data and adequate observational data to understand whether or not these injections are safe.
“The bottom line is, we don't have enough data to understand safety.
“The other thing is that we are made to believe in the public eye that this is a ναccιnє against a viral infection. So the entire world is thinking that this is a ναccιnє to protect us against SARS Cov2 viral infection. And when you have a ναccιnє that's supposed to be effective as a ναccιnє, you're supposed to have antibody immunity against the SARS Cov2 virus.  And that's never been evaluated with these injections as to whether or not we have antibody immunity to a SARS Cov2 virus.
“Instead, what we have is the genetic information of what is believed to be a piece of the SARS Cov2 virus and that piece is called the ‘spike protein’, and the technology that's being used is a technology to make this injection that's never been used in ναccιnє science or methodology before with any kind of success.
“So we are essentially taking the genetic instructions that make a synthetic spike protein believed to be a part of the SARS Cov2 virus, and we're giving those sets of instructions into the body and asking the human body to take the genetic instructions of that spike protein and make more of it in our own machinery.
“And so, this messenger RNA technology, which is what it’s called, is delivering the genetic instruction for us to make the spike protein. And the problem is that no study has ever been done to test its safety, but also no study is been done to test whether we turn on the production of that spike protein and ever turn it off.
“And so, spike protein in the naturally occurring SARS CoV2 viral infection has been shown to cause brain inflammation and neurological damage, heart attacks, lung disease, liver disease, kidney disease, and interacting with the male and female reproductive systems, along with affecting blood binding to oxygen and blood clotting.
“And so, we know that the natural disease of SARS CoV2, because of the effects of the spike protein, is making people sick with all of these kinds of systemic illnesses. And so now we're taking that spike protein genetic instructions, and we're asking our bodies to make more of that spike protein. And so by making more of that spike protein, we are essentially creating the symptoms and the illness of CÖVÌD-19 by giving people the potential to have brain damage and neurological damage, lung disease, liver disease, kidney disease, heart attacks, strokes, blood clotting issues, and impairments to male and female reproductive systems.
“And there's no study to show whether when the body starts manufacturing the synthetic spike protein - whether or not we ever turn off the production of that spike protein.
“And so that spike protein is known to be pretty damaging to the human tissue. And so, we know that spike protein has been found in saliva, we know that it's been found in the anus, and we have to ask the question: Is it found in the exhalation molecules that come out of our breath? Is it found in the skin when we sweat and we smell the spike proteins come out? And if so, does that impact other people with whom we come in contact?
“And so, what we've been seeing is a massive increase in those who've been given the injection of blood clotting problems, miscarriages, stillborns, infertility, stroke, heart attack, autoimmune diseases, and death, just to name a few, and that's in those who been injected.  So certainly there should be a suspicion when you see people around the injected people who have not been injected getting the typical symptoms of CÖVÌD in addition to miscarriages, bleeding, irregular menstrual cycles; it should raise a very, very strong suspicion.
“The spike protein is, we are told, just specific to the SARS CoV2 virus, so that when your body makes the synthetic spike protein, you're supposed to produce an antibody that’s supposed to attack the spike protein.
“Now, we don't know if that spike protein production keeps going and going and going, and that would make the antibody production keep going and going and going as well. And the thing is, that we are finding that the genetic instructions of the spike protein are not specific just to the SARS CoV2 virus. The genetic instructions of the spike protein are also similar to, or the same as, many proteins that exist in the body itself.
“And so therefore, if we're going to produce an antibody against the genetic instructions of the spike protein, those antibodies are going to find every bit of protein tissue around the body that matches the genetic instructions of the spike protein, and that antibody to the spike protein genetic instructions is going to produce an attack on any of the proteins and tissues in the body that are similar or the same to the genetic instructions of the spike protein. So that's why you'll see autoimmune diseases."
Dr. Christiane Northrup -"What's actually in the CÖVÌD ναccιnє?":

“But, many months ago there was an article that came out in the European literature where there were several proteins in the male and female reproductive system that were found to have similar genetic instructions to the genetic instructions of the spike protein.
“The scientist raised the concern that if we inject the genetic instructions of the spike protein into the body, and cause the body to make an antibody against that genetic instruction of the spike protein, we will also cause the body to make an antibody against the male and female reproductive systems, because those proteins in the male and female reproductive systems had similar instruction to the spike protein.
“And he raised a very strong concern about it, because his concern was that it would basically immobilize and take out sperm from being able to fertilize an egg, and that it would also impair the egg itself, and that it would also impair the placenta.
“And so, the experts around the world did the following: When they heard this scientific concern, the experts around the world said, ‘Oh, but the amount of genetic instructions of the proteins in the male and female reproductive systems are so small in similarity to the genetic instructions of the spike protein, that it really shouldn't make a difference.’ And ladies and gentlemen, that’s how we got the science that said there should be no concerns about infertility or miscarriages in men and women respectively.  There were no studies, there was just an opinion that said the genetic instructions of the proteins on the male and female reproductive systems were such small similarities to the spike protein that it shouldn't matter. And therefore, it didn't matter.
“And so, what we're seeing in women who get the injection is a very large, hundreds of percent, increase in miscarriages and stillborns of their baby, all being reported to ναccιnє Adverse Event Reporting System.
“And now what we're seeing is women who are around others who've been injected, are having the same experience, which has to raise the suspicion that not only does that messenger RNA make the body produce spike protein on an ongoing basis, but that spike protein is probably shedding out of the breath, the saliva, the skin, and who knows where else in the body it’s being shed from.
“Just a last point before you ask me the next question: That’s only based on what we think we know is in these injections. But Dr. Tenpenny and I have discussed this on numerous occasions, that there is potential for other messenger RNA proteins being injected into the body that would cause the body to make all sorts of proteins that we may not be aware of.”


Quote
Quote https://t.co/ew0pItMAIx (https://t.co/ew0pItMAIx)
— Dr Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) April 21, 2021 (https://ƚwιƚƚeɾ.com/naomirwolf/status/1384830844209147904?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: SeanJohnson on April 28, 2021, 07:10:36 AM
One possible hole in the theory is that if people could actually be made sick from being in proximity to the vaxed, then the Gates’, Faucis’ and TPTB would also be vulnerable to infection, given the numbers worldwide who have received the jab.

Unless this shedding issue, if real, was an unintended consequence.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Ladislaus on April 28, 2021, 08:03:09 AM
Ann Barnhardt posted a Pfizer docuмent where they admitted that people can be exposed by inhalation or skin contact.

https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/04/28/humanicide-pfizer-admits-in-its-own-mrna-jab-trial-docuмentation-that-non-jabbed-people-can-be-environmentally-exposed-to-the-jabs-spike-proteins-by-inhalation-or-skin-contact/

Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Bonaventure on April 28, 2021, 08:21:37 AM
Ann Barnhardt posted a pfιzєr docuмent where they admitted that people can be exposed by inhalation or skin contact.

https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/04/28/humanicide-pfιzєr-admits-in-its-own-mrna-jab-trial-docuмentation-that-non-jabbed-people-can-be-environmentally-exposed-to-the-jabs-spike-proteins-by-inhalation-or-skin-contact/

If the above link doesn't work for you, try this link: https://tinyurl.com/335br9jm

(https://www.barnhardt.biz/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/img_4021.jpg)


(https://www.barnhardt.biz/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/img_4022.jpg)
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: forlorn on April 28, 2021, 08:48:43 AM
My main point, which I forgot to mention, is that I am almost certain the goal here is not to kill a major chunk of the human race within the next few years. I think such an outcome would in fact be extremely harmful to the ruling elite, as it would destabilize society to the point of creating a Mad Max world, or a world like you see in your typical zombie movie. Sorry, Matthew, you don't strike me as a movie buff type of guy,  :laugh1: but if you want to know what I'm talking about just watch a standard zombie flick like I am Legend or Dawn of the Dead and tell me how much power вιℓℓ gαтeѕ or any, um, ethnic group would have in a society where there is that level of chaos.
Agreed. The aim is for greater control over us, but killing off billions or making almost every woman infertile etc. would cause absolute chaos, pandemonium, lynchings in the streets... there'd be no order or control whatsoever.

Whatever happens will be much more subtle and gradual IMO.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: gladius_veritatis on April 28, 2021, 09:02:33 AM
Time alone will tell, of course, but I see no reason they wouldn't want to accelerate the killing, even to a pace that strikes the average person as far too quick.

Gates publicly stated 15% population reduction.  Do you think the comments would have slipped past as many people if he had said 90% population reduction?  The Georgia Guidestones clearly mention reducing population to 500 million.  That is where the Gates' of the world want things to go and it is not like they have centuries remaining themselves. The past year-plus makes it crystal clear TPTB are getting anxious and are willing to take enormous risks to get what they want, which is NOT complete control over BILLIONS, but MILLIONS. 

They have so much food, ammo, etc., stockpiled in remote locations, why not just kill off the rabble en masse?  

I do not claim to know exactly how they will proceed.  Any such predictions would be a fool's errand.  However, absolutely nothing would surprise me at this point.  They want that VAST majority of the human race DEAD -- now, not 100 years from now. 
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: PAT317 on April 28, 2021, 09:11:16 AM
Time alone will tell, of course, but I see no reason they wouldn't want to accelerate the killing, even to a pace that strikes the average person as far too quick.

Gates publicly stated 15% population reduction.  Do you think the comments would have slipped past as many people if he had said 90% population reduction?  The Georgia Guidestones clearly mention reducing population to 500 million.  That is where the Gates' of the world want things to go and it is not like they have centuries remaining themselves. The past year-plus makes it crystal clear TPTB are getting anxious and are willing to take enormous risks to get what they want, which is NOT complete control over BILLIONS, but MILLIONS.

They have so much food, ammo, etc., stockpiled in remote locations, why not just kill off the rabble en masse?  

I do not claim to know exactly how they will proceed.  Any such predictions would be a fool's errand.  However, absolutely nothing would surprise me at this point.  They want that VAST majority of the human race DEAD -- now, not 100 years from now.
.
Well said.
.
Not to mention, these people are demonically-controlled, so they do not think like sane, "good" people. 
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Yeti on April 28, 2021, 09:17:54 AM
This.  No one (that I've seen) is saying you pick it up by walking past someone at a grocery story.  
.
In Ann Barnhardt's most recent podcast, there was a woman on there who was experiencing various female-related health problems, who had not been vaccinated, and she speculated that she had gotten it by being around old people in the grocery store when she went shopping. She said that, at the time of day she goes to buy food, most of the other people in the store are old people, the vast majority of whom have been vaccinated, and that was the only time she could think that she might have been in proximity to vaccinated people.
.
I don't know, I'm not a doctor, but that explanation seems far-fetched to me. We'll have to see as more information comes out what is really going on, but I think it's too early now to tell.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 09:24:06 AM
.
In Ann Barnhardt's most recent podcast, there was a woman on there who was experiencing various female-related health problems, who had not been ναccιnαted, and she speculated that she had gotten it by being around old people in the grocery store when she went shopping. She said that, at the time of day she goes to buy food, most of the other people in the store are old people, the vast majority of whom have been ναccιnαted, and that was the only time she could think that she might have been in proximity to ναccιnαted people.
.
I don't know, I'm not a doctor, but that explanation seems far-fetched to me. We'll have to see as more information comes out what is really going on, but I think it's too early now to tell.
How old is this woman?
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: B from A on April 28, 2021, 09:26:58 AM
.
In Ann Barnhardt's most recent podcast, there was a woman on there who was experiencing various female-related health problems, who had not been ναccιnαted, and she speculated that she had gotten it by being around old people in the grocery store when she went shopping. She said that, at the time of day she goes to buy food, most of the other people in the store are old people, the vast majority of whom have been ναccιnαted, and that was the only time she could think that she might have been in proximity to ναccιnαted people.
.
I don't know, I'm not a doctor, but that explanation seems far-fetched to me. We'll have to see as more information comes out what is really going on, but I think it's too early now to tell.
.
Gotcha.  I hadn't heard any examples like that.  I can see now why you mentioned the grocery story example.  So far all of the stories I'm hearing are people who have had extended contact (e.g. spouse, jabbed grandparents babysitting, all coworkers are jabbed, etc.).  
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Mr G on April 28, 2021, 10:14:37 AM
HUMANICIDE: pfιzєr admits in its own mRNA jab trial docuмentation that non-jabbed people can be ENVIRONMENTALLY EXPOSED to the jab’s spike proteins by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT. | Barnhardt (https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/04/28/humanicide-pfιzєr-admits-in-its-own-mrna-jab-trial-docuмentation-that-non-jabbed-people-can-be-environmentally-exposed-to-the-jabs-spike-proteins-by-inhalation-or-skin-contact/)

HUMANICIDE: pfιzєr admits in its own mRNA jab trial docuмentation that non-jabbed people can be ENVIRONMENTALLY EXPOSED to the jab’s spike proteins by INHALATION or SKIN CONTACT.

It’s not a ναccιnє or anything even remotely related to ναccιnєs. It’s a HUMANICIDE. And it sheds and is highly transmissible by pfιzєr’s own gleeful admission.

And the self-extermination of mankind required absolutely nothing more than strangers on television re-naming common seasonal colds and flu, and thus starting a global religion.


The only thing left to see is how effective these HUMANICIDES are. Will they kill outright, or are they, as suspected from day one, a mass sterilization project?

Here is the link to the full docuмent. Page 67 is shown below. (https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_pfιzєr_BioNTech.pdf#page67)
C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_pfιzєr_BioNTech.pdf (tghn.org) (https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_pfιzєr_BioNTech.pdf#page67)
(https://www.barnhardt.biz/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/img_4022.jpg)
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: ByzCat3000 on April 28, 2021, 11:06:58 AM
Its also entirely possible that the elite will release some disease that kills only the unvaccinated, which would honestly make more sense since leftists are more likely to vax and right wing dissenters are less likely to.

(I'm still not getting jabbed because I don't know what the plan is or even if there is a specific plan or if the vaccines are just a smokescreen but I don't trust experimental technology.)
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Bonaventure on April 28, 2021, 11:16:40 AM
How old is this woman?

33
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 11:26:04 AM
33
This is on the young side, but she could be starting perimenopause.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Bonaventure on April 28, 2021, 12:20:24 PM
This is on the young side, but she could be starting perimenopause.

Highly doubtful.

Her symptoms were the opposite of menopause.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 12:21:51 PM
Highly doubtful.

Her symptoms were the opposite of menopause.
Like?
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Bonaventure on April 28, 2021, 12:22:19 PM
Like?

Listen to the podcast.

Pertinent portion begins at about the 27' mark.

https://tinyurl.com/33abt2w6
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 12:24:55 PM
Listen to the podcast.
I'm not interested in the long version.  Just list the symptoms.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Yeti on April 28, 2021, 12:45:45 PM
Let me see, I'm trying to remember all the details. She said she was 33 years old, and started noticing problems in February, I think it was, or maybe March. I won't bother to try to explain the symptoms she had; if you look at my profile you will understand why I do not exactly understand what she was describing here. :laugh1: Anyway, recently she had a routine checkup involving blood tests and stuff, not because of her recent problems, and everything came back okay. She called her (female) doctor up and asked what was going on, especially since all the tests indicated that she should be fine. The doctor started whispering into the phone and closed her office door as she spoke, and said she was basically speaking off the record as a doctor, but she and numerous other doctors had been seeing numerous other women with similar symptoms since the vaccinations began, and they thought it was connected.
.
That's about what I remember.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 01:57:56 PM
Let me see, I'm trying to remember all the details. She said she was 33 years old, and started noticing problems in February, I think it was, or maybe March. I won't bother to try to explain the symptoms she had; if you look at my profile you will understand why I do not exactly understand what she was describing here. :laugh1: Anyway, recently she had a routine checkup involving blood tests and stuff, not because of her recent problems, and everything came back okay. She called her (female) doctor up and asked what was going on, especially since all the tests indicated that she should be fine. The doctor started whispering into the phone and closed her office door as she spoke, and said she was basically speaking off the record as a doctor, but she and numerous other doctors had been seeing numerous other women with similar symptoms since the vaccinations began, and they thought it was connected.
.
That's about what I remember.
Thank you for taking the time to actually answer my question.

I have gone back to listen and interestingly enough I also had a similar issue beginning of Feb....but I'm menopausal so I doubt there's any connection.  I also had a similar issue 4 years ago, pre-CÖVÌD, so that was definitely not connected. 

This sort of reaction is odd for a 33 year old, but not necessarily unheard of as there are occurrences of women going through early perimenopause who are perfectly healthy otherwise.  

I don't think we can make conclusions about this yet.  It still seems "out there" for me.    
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: B from A on April 28, 2021, 02:29:32 PM
Of course one can't make too big a deal out of this one particular example from one particular person.  But there are countless stories that are at least 'things that make you go hmmmm..'  And since this is a great big experiment, an analyst should take all data into account.  Also, in a human experiment, it is so hard to isolate variables, especially in this one.

Unjαbbеd Wоmеn Clαim Unusuαl Mеnstruαl Cyclеs & Miscαrriαgеs Aftеr Bеing Nеαr Rеcеntly jαbbеd (https://tinyurl.com/GEdGriff)
^has a summary & then 4 links to other sources

Another compilation (https://tinyurl.com/KelenMcB)


Quote
I’m а mаssаgе thеrаpist аlsо. I’vе bееn cоncеrnеd аbоut this. I mаssаgеd thrее cliеnts twо mоnths аgо thе vеry dаy thеy hаd thеir CVV аnd I hаd nо idеа оf thе rаmificаtiоns. I blееd fоr 8 strаight dаys. I hаvе fоr yеаrs оnly blеd 4-5. My оldеst dаughtеr 17 hаs bееn hаving blооd clоts during cyclе аnd nоsе blееds. Shе didn’t hаvе thе CVV but shе wоrks in dеntаl аrоund thоsе thаt hаvе. Plus hеr tеаchеrs. 
Quote

I'm in а stillbirth grоup duе tо thе pаssing оf my sоn frоm а blооd clоtting disоrdеr but thе аmоunt оf stillbirths thаt fоllоw thоsе twо v is аstrоnоmicаl. A lоt оf thеm dоn't cоnnеct it bеcаusе thе dоctоrs clаim it's unrеlаtеd. It's sо sаd.

Quote
my friеnd is а midwifе in Tеxаs. Shе sаid thаt in April аlоnе, shе hаs dеlivеrеd 3 still bоrn births, 1 in thе 2nd аnd 2 in thе 3rd trimеstеr. 1 оf thе wоmеn rеcеivеd thе jаb, thе оthеr 2 did nоt, but livеd with husbаnds whо hаd rеcеivеd it. Sоmеthing is dеfinitеly gоing оn!
Quote

sоmеthing similаr hаs hаppеnеd tо mе if yоu rеаd my аbоvе pоst,ivе bееn tеrribly ill sincе my pаrtnеr hаd his vаx,ivе dоnе а cоvid tеst аnd it wаs nеgаtivе,im surе hе hаs shеd sоmеthing frоm his vаx tо mе,i bеcаmе ill thе dаy аftеr hе hаd it
Quote

Bееn аrоund fаmily mеmbеrs whо hаvе hаd thе V. Rеcеntly hаd а miscаrriаgе аnd wоndеring if it's cоnnеctеd.

Quote
sаmе hеrе. My bаby's hеаrt stоppеd аt 10 wееks. Nо idеа if rеlаtеd оr nоt. Didn’t lеаrn аbоut аll this until аftеr it hаppеnеd.

Quote

Vеry clоsе friеnd hаd hеаlthy prеgnаncy thеn аt 37 wееks just а fеw wееks аftеr hеr husbаnd gоt thе sеcоnd jаb thеrе wаs nо fеtаl hеаrtbеаt аt chеckup.


Quote
Quote
  My brоthеr gоt his first оnе Mаrch 7th. April 2nd I rеcеivеd а tеxt sаying his wifе hаdn’t fеlt thе bаby mоvе much fоr а cоuplе wееks. At hеr аpt April 1st thеrе wаs nо hеаrtbеаt. Shе hаd а stillbоrn аt 25 wееks.
.
Just a tiny sampling of the types of comments I'm seeing a lot.  Of course, there could be other explanations.  Of course some might & some might not be due to exposure to the jabbed.  But certainly something worth being aware of, and worth exploring (at least for doctors like Sherri Tenpenny et. al. who look into these types of things), and certainly not something to dismiss just because we can't explain it, IMO.  
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 03:04:06 PM
Of course one can't make too big a deal out of this one particular example from one particular person.  But there are countless stories that are at least 'things that make you go hmmmm..'  And since this is a great big experiment, an analyst should take all data into account.  Also, in a human experiment, it is so hard to isolate variables, especially in this one.

Unjαbbеd Wоmеn Clαim Unusuαl Mеnstruαl Cyclеs & Miscαrriαgеs Aftеr Bеing Nеαr Rеcеntly jαbbеd (https://tinyurl.com/GEdGriff)
^has a summary & then 4 links to other sources

Another compilation (https://tinyurl.com/KelenMcB)


.
Just a tiny sampling of the types of comments I'm seeing a lot.  Of course, there could be other explanations.  Of course some might & some might not be due to exposure to the jabbed.  But certainly something worth being aware of, and worth exploring (at least for doctors like Sherri Tenpenny et. al. who look into these types of things), and certainly not something to dismiss just because we can't explain it, IMO.  
Sure, it's possible.  But as I have posted/implied elsewhere I am very hesitant to jump on every anti-CÖVÌD vax report. I don't trust much of what is reported on both sides, and I question them.  I find that there are many on this forum who are quick to believe/post any anti-vax report as if it's gospel.  

As of now, I know of no woman who has experienced any of these symptoms because they were around people who were ναccιnαted.  
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Matthew on April 28, 2021, 03:13:45 PM
I don't think we can make conclusions about this yet.  It still seems "out there" for me.    

And it should seem "out there", because frankly it IS pretty far-fetched.

We're talking about NOT ONLY the bad guys are going to sterilize many/most of the vaxxed, not only is the vax going to cause many of the vaxxed to drop dead during the next flu season...

As if that wasn't bad enough, and hard enough to believe!

But no, these reports go further, saying that not only 1/3 to 1/2 of the world will be affected (the vaxxed) but even the other half as well!

Let's put it this way: if the unvaxxed are in danger, then the HUMAN BEINGS who unleashed this scam, who want to depopulate the world, who want a global tyranny/ƈσmmυɳιsm, NWO, the Great Reset, etc. WILL BE IN DANGER AS WELL.

I doubt the devils are going to nourish these bad guys. I doubt they grow all their own food with 0 human contact. There is no safe place on earth, if the vaxxed (which make up over 1/3 of the population) are exuding some lethal protein/substance for months on end.

I don't think Klaus Schwab is fit enough to live like a wildman in the jungles of South America, subsisting on wild berries and mushrooms (able to identify what is edible, and what is poisonous) and occasionally killing an animal for meat with his own hands.

It's not like the bad guys behind all this are robots or spirits. They have human bodies just like us. If you unleash a killer virus, it might just kill you too. And remember, for these morons, this life is the basket where they have ALL their eggs. Once they die, they belong to satan and will be tortured in hell for eternity. Many of them even know and acknowledge that!
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Yeti on April 28, 2021, 03:27:33 PM
Yeah, I agree. These concerns are getting a little over the top.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: 2Vermont on April 28, 2021, 03:58:31 PM
And it should seem "out there", because frankly it IS pretty far-fetched.

We're talking about NOT ONLY the bad guys are going to sterilize many/most of the vaxxed, not only is the vax going to cause many of the vaxxed to drop dead during the next flu season...

As if that wasn't bad enough, and hard enough to believe!

But no, these reports go further, saying that not only 1/3 to 1/2 of the world will be affected (the vaxxed) but even the other half as well!

Thank you.  

This is what I meant when I wrote the following in post #21:

It's about control through fear.  And I would add that control through fear can happen on both sides.

We all need to be very careful not to fall into either trap.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on April 28, 2021, 04:56:17 PM
Decades? Don't you mean months?
Seeing what CCP puppet Obiden has "accomplished" in his first 100 days makes me inclined to agree with you.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on April 28, 2021, 05:00:50 PM
Let's put it this way: if the unvaxxed are in danger, then the HUMAN BEINGS who unleashed this scam, who want to depopulate the world, who want a global tyranny/ƈσmmυɳιsm, NWO, the Great Reset, etc. WILL BE IN DANGER AS WELL.

Knowledgeable sources say the elites have technology 50 or more years more advanced than what is publicly known.

Is it not possible that these satan-worshipping, baby-killing child-rapists have prepared an antidote for themselves long before the Rockefeller report predicted this.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on April 28, 2021, 05:02:41 PM

It's about control through fear.  And I would add that control through fear can happen on both sides.

We all need to be very careful not to fall into either trap.
Well said. A careful reading of Scripture tells us to "fear only God." If we truly trust in God, we will not be ruled by fear.

Matthew 10:28
And fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body in hell.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: gladius_veritatis on April 28, 2021, 05:07:28 PM
Considering how much the Enemies like to play with poisons, who is to say they don't already have an antidote of sorts?  I don't really care either way, but their infernal buddies understand creation FAR better than they or we do.  Just because they are (wisely) averse to taking what they know to be poisonous vackses doesn't mean they never put anything in their bodies.

Regardless of what transpires, God is just as much in complete control now as He was in the 13th century, etc.  Wicked times are here and will only get worse.  No help is coming, not even from Holy Church (whatever constitutes Her present reality) -- not until we repent and convert and do as Our Lord and Our Lady have asked/directed repeatedly.

Hold fast, pray the Rosary, read about trust in Divine Providence and know that each and every one of us is here, now according to the perfect, adorable will of God. 
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on April 28, 2021, 05:08:43 PM
(https://www.barnhardt.biz/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/img_4022.jpg)
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: gladius_veritatis on April 28, 2021, 05:09:13 PM
Knowledgeable sources say the elites have technology 50 or more years more advanced than what is publicly known.

Is it not possible that these satan-worshipping, baby-killing child-rapists have prepared an antidote for themselves long before the Rockefeller report predicted this.
I was typing a similar question when you posted this.  It seems completely plausible to me, whatever the reality it.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on April 28, 2021, 05:13:30 PM
I don't believe that this shedding is much worse than just actually getting CÖVÌD.  It's those spike proteins that cause the CÖVÌD symptoms.  So it's still orders of magnitude different than having your body continually producing these things.  Without the mRNA stuff in your system, the natural immune system SHOULD just take care of the foreign invaders.
You are probably right, however we know that reality is chewed up and spat out by Fake News in order to manipulate, gaslight, and this case demonize those who refused to be vaccinated.
Most people right now are not dealing with reality, but with the false reality being pushed by the synagog of satan.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Struthio on April 28, 2021, 07:44:51 PM
Knowledgeable sources say...

 :jester:  :facepalm:  :fryingpan:
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on May 01, 2021, 02:52:48 PM
:jester:  :facepalm:  :fryingpan:
Ex-NSA Agent Vance Davis

https://thecommonsenseshow.com/agenda-21-conspiracy-economics/ex-nsa-agent-vance-davis-identifies-real-globalist-power-brokers-and-their-secretive-agenda

Bill Pawelec, who had done much contract work for the CIA reached out to me. Bill's reason for contacting me  was to ascertain my credibility which was easy to do because Bill had contact with my father while both of them were working at Sunstrand Electronics in Westminster, Colorado. It was at Sunstrand that my father and Bill were working on earth-penetrating tomography in which activity of one to two miles deep beneath the earth could be observed by satellite. In the process of our early communications, I became good friends with Bill. Eventually, I was introduced to Vance Davis
New Energy Source
(http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/siteupload/2015/11/ken-lay.jpe) (http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/siteupload/2015/11/ken-lay.jpe)
Ken Lay CEO of ENRON
(http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/siteupload/2015/10/vance-davis.jpe) (http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/siteupload/2015/10/vance-davis.jpe)
Vance Davis
By 1997, Vance and Bill had developed a prototype energy source which would have revolutionized energy usage and distribution on the planet. Along with former Apollo astronaut, Ken Arnold, whose home I had visited in 1997 with Bill Pawelec and Vance Davis, they set out to revolutionize the energy paradigm on this planet. Subsequently, I learned that this technology was eventually brought to the attention of ENRON and were covertly working on integration of what Vance had learned while in the NSA and what Bill learned as a contract agent for the CIA. You remember ENRON don't you? It was one of the premiere energy companies in the world that was known for their stunning innovations. Eventually, Ken Lay, the embattled CEO of ENRON was framed for insider trading, embezzlement  and a host of other charges. ENRON was significantly dismantled, brick by brick. Lay (2006) allegedly took the path of ѕυιcιdє, err... a heart attack, as an escape from facing his legal consequences. However, even CNNMoney.com (http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/06/commentary/wastler/) sarcastically speculated that Lay never died. Speculation abounded that his ѕυιcιdє was faked and he was allowed to enter Federal Witness Protection. Now why would the Feds allow Lay to escape justice, or was he just framed? In short, and according to both Pawelec and Davis, Lay's intentions to unleash power sources upon the world without the approval of the global elite, was met with a swift response. Lay was framed and with these events, the hopes of a new energy source that would supplant oil as the primary energy source on the planet was gone. But apparently Lay had leverage and was allowed to go into hiding.

https://thecommonsenseshow.com/united-states/et-walks-among-us-says-ex-cia-agent
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Pax Vobis on May 01, 2021, 08:39:48 PM
Dr Judy says the mRNA, which produces the spike protein, can be spread by inhalation.  The non-ναccιnαted could be infected but if their immune system is still strong, they can fight it off.  But still, the point is, vax shedding is real.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on May 02, 2021, 12:40:25 PM
Dr Judy says the mRNA, which produces the spike protein, can be spread by inhalation.  The non-ναccιnαted could be infected but if their immune system is still strong, they can fight it off.  But still, the point is, vax shedding is real.
Yes. It seems their plan is to kill off the elderly and those with health issues. Think of all the money they will save from not having to pay Social Security and government retirement plans.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Disputaciones on May 02, 2021, 04:13:58 PM
One possible hole in the theory is that if people could actually be made sick from being in proximity to the vaxed, then the Gates’, Faucis’ and TPTB would also be vulnerable to infection, given the numbers worldwide who have received the jab.

Unless this shedding issue, if real, was an unintended consequence.
I've thought the exact same thing about 5g, WiFi etc.

The elites are completely surrounded by all this technology and as far as I can tell, aren't wearing lead suits 24/7.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Disputaciones on May 02, 2021, 04:16:34 PM
Agreed. The aim is for greater control over us, but killing off billions or making almost every woman infertile etc. would cause absolute chaos, pandemonium, lynchings in the streets... there'd be no order or control whatsoever.

Whatever happens will be much more subtle and gradual IMO.
Most people have not done a damn thing so far even with all that has already happened, which I think would have already warranted chaos.

They are all so brainwashed that I fear they will never rise up, no matter how bad it gets.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Disputaciones on May 02, 2021, 04:25:22 PM
Think of all the money they will save from not having to pay Social Security and government retirement plans.
How much?
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Cera on May 02, 2021, 08:14:15 PM
Most people have not done a damn thing so far even with all that has already happened, which I think would have already warranted chaos.

They are all so brainwashed that I fear they will never rise up, no matter how bad it gets.
What exactly have you done to "rise up"? Maybe you went to DC on the 6th? of January? That worked out well didn't it.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: forlorn on May 03, 2021, 07:37:30 AM
Most people have not done a damn thing so far even with all that has already happened, which I think would have already warranted chaos.

They are all so brainwashed that I fear they will never rise up, no matter how bad it gets.
I think a situation of billions of people dying or going infertile is a bit different.
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: confederate catholic on May 03, 2021, 08:12:51 AM
Quote
. Faithful Catholics are like sheep without a shepherd, confused and isolated, and have to drive far to get to a Tridentine Mass -- and that was before 2012. But now the largest bulwark of Tradition, the SSPX, is rapidly falling to Modernism and is accepting Vatican II and the Conciliar Church -- causing much more isolation, even longer drive times, and in many cases, the Faithful HAVE NO OPTION for Mass within a 6-hour drive of their location.

The recent SSPX rosary crusade appeared to have less than 7000 participants. So not exactly 'bulwark' in terms of getting even their followers to do what they want. We are already At a breaking point.

The one constant I have seen with this so called Ronathing is blood clots, blood clots, blood clots. So now hearing from multiple females (including an RN that her last period lasted 22 weeks, yes this woman is dense as a doorpost) about thrombocytopenia. It seems that the vaxx does work. It works so well that if you're vaxxed you can just bleed out. :facepalm:


https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840
Title: Re: Vax shedding - it can't be THAT bad
Post by: Disputaciones on May 03, 2021, 09:06:02 AM
What exactly have you done to "rise up"? Maybe you went to DC on the 6th? of January? That worked out well didn't it.
I live with only one person and we don't really know anyone, belong to any groups etc.

I have confronted the fools in the one store in my area that force you to wear the diaper and I never wear one in the other stores, even though 99% do.

But I'll take back what I said because there actually has been a lot of protesting all over the world, just not as much as I thought there should be at this point.