I think the man who posted this is largely correct. We've seen much of this verified already:


1. The first to die from the vaccines will be those susceptible to blood clots. The spike protein these vaccines cause the body to produce attach to endothelial ACE2 receptors. They act as a partial agonist (stimulator). In turn, the cells' mitochondria spin up ATP production, but imperfectly. This causes errors in the reactions involved, resulting in the production of rogue hydroxyl groups instead of ATP. This can and usually does kill the cell. This happens all over the body, resulting in invisible and unperceived (you do not have nerves in your circulatory system) systemic cardiovascular inflammation. Clotting ensues, either on the micro or macro level.

2. mRNA is absolutely reverse transcribed to DNA. We have known this is potentially fatal since 1998 when the University of Pennsylvania killed a kid using a chimp-gene modified adenovirus to cure a rare disease in which the body cannot reduce levels of ammonia. The kid was cured, and then went into liver failure. The chimp genes inserted into the viral vector were reverse transcribed into his liver cells, and his immune system destroyed them - killing him.

3. The mechanism is Line 1 retrotransposons. These are ancient retroviruses and genetic junk that is spooled up and inactive 99.9% of the time. Introduction of viral mRNA is an adjuvant that causes these genes to unwind and express, including viral reverse transcriptase. Studies have since confirmed that this is happening with the vaccines.

4. Line 1 retrotransposons are a matter of chance. Sometimes they will reverse transcribe to Line 1 itself, creating useless chimeras that do not express. Sometimes they will write to active DNA segments. Sometimes in doing so, it will overwrite a necessary gene, killing the cell. Sometimes it will write to active DNA, and the former mRNA will express as if it was your own gene. Sometimes the immune system will then kill these cells. Sometimes, they will not.

5. For reference, one shot of the Moderna vaccine contains 40 trillion packets of mRNA in their peg-ylated shells. If Line 1 retrotranposons successfully reverse transcribe even .05% of the time - then 200 billion cells will have the gene for creating the covid spike protein inserted into them. These cells will then occasionally produce the covid spike protein - for the rest of the recipient's life.

6. The number one place the vaccine mRNA ends up is the thymus, the second is the liver, and the third is female ovaries. KEEP THIS IN MIND. They knew about this. It was revealed in the most recent Pfizer docuмent dump, and in fact was known well before then for those of us paying attention. I will come back to this.

7. Aside from causing progressive cardiovascular damage that a recipient would never feel or know about because it is painless and largely symptomless, the spike protein inhibits v(d)j recombination. When your immune cells create new antibodies, they do not have a gene that codes for that creation. So, they split their DNA, pluck out sequences that partially could create the necessary sequence, splice them together and insert them, and then fix the DNA that was damaged in this process. This is v(d)j recombination. Only 2% of killer T cells are successful in doing this, which is why people who are seriously ill start to rapidly lose weight. The body needs resources to fuel this very imperfect process. In the vaccinated, this process is now further impaired to the point where their immune systems cannot keep up. Their levels of CD4 and CD8 cells will progressively decline, leadings to vaccine induced AIDS. Mind you, this can take between 5-10 years to progress to the point where symptoms show in those infected with HIV.

8. Back to the ovaries. v(D)j recombination is used by immune cells, but the proteins involved - BRCA1 and 53BP1 - are used in every cell for routine DNA repair. BRCA1 zips up double stranded breaks in DNA. 53BP1 acts as a goalpost, directing where DNA repair occurs. Both of these proteins are named after their involvement in cancer research. If either of these proteins are not present, such as in the case of people who do not have working copies of genes to create these proteins, the risk of cancer increases exponentially with age.

9. Not only will those who received the vaccines have an increased risk of every type of cancer, but women will start to enter menopause earlier and start giving birth to children with more birth defects. Women only have so many eggs, and their exposure to these vaccines and suppression of BRCA1 and 53BP1 means these eggs cells can no longer engage in routine DNA repair from everyday exposure to oxidative stress. These eggs will either die prematurely, or result in a viable pregnancy but with damaged offspring.

10. Line 1 retrotransposons can and will reverse transcribe the vaccine mRNA to somatic cells. The egg cells. This means that children born to vaccinated mothers will produce the covid spike protein every day of their lives. Their expression of BRCA1 and 53BP1 will be inhibited from the day of their birth until they die. v(D)j recombination will be inhibited from the day of their birth until they die. Not only are they likely to get cancer early and often, but they will be immune compromised and unlikely to be able to mount successful adaptive immune responses to common pathogens. They will be sickly and short lived.

11. When the medical community cannot hide this anymore, it's all over.The ramp up in deaths, cancer, and the pending MASS vaccine induced AIDS epidemic is being swept under the rug for now.

12. Eventually, there will be no more hiding it. The attempts to cover things up as long as possible was anticipated since doctors and academics are arrogant, self-righteous psychopaths who could be expected to protect their reputations regardless of the cost. This will simply result in even more anger.

13. As was the goal, attacks on doctors, the media, and government will result in cινιℓ ωαrs worldwide and the destruction of national governments. Only 20% of the human population will survive.

Excerpts from the NPR article (link above):

Doudna is a woman who has male bone structure btw.

ISAACSON: When Jennifer Doudna first helped create this tool called CRISPR that allowed you to do gene editing, she had a nightmare. And she walked into a room with somebody who said, I want to understand your new technology, and the person looked up and it was Adolf Hitler. And this made her realize that if it got into the wrong hands, somebody might use it for eugenics purposes, might want to create a master race, might want to create people who were stronger as soldiers.

I mean, you know, Vladimir Putin was talking about CRISPR as a gene-editing technology to a youth group at one point, and he said, well, we might use it to make better and stronger soldiers that don't feel pain. So that's - you can realize, all right, some of our enemies might be doing things; we got to figure out how to counteract it.

Now, you can see why some people say, well, that's great; we could help wipe AIDS, you know, from the human species. But the problem with that type of use of CRISPR is when you do it in reproductive cells, like early-stage embryos or eggs or sperm. It affects every cell in the body, and thus it's inherited by the children and all the descendants of the edits you've made. And that's a line you don't want to cross lightly, is making the type of edit that will not only affect a patient but also affect the entire human species and all their descendants.

This is DIRECTED EVOLUTION and Catholics know that in God's economy suffering has a purpose:

One of the people in my book - a wonderful young kid named, you know, David Sanchez - has sickle cell anemia. And he's being treated for it, and they tell him about CRISPR and how it could make it so his children won't have sickle cell anemia. And David says, wow, that's really cool. But then he says, but I think it should be up to the kid to decide. And they said, well, what do you mean? Wouldn't you want to make sure your kids didn't have sickle cell anemia and that all their kids didn't? And he said, well, I think it should be up to each person to decide because even though sickle cell anemia has been really brutal to me, it taught me a lot of things. It taught me character. It taught me persistence. It taught me empathy and patience.

More shots to come to cure whatever ails you.

Your "AI doctor" will know what ails you before you do by monitoring your real time stats (delivered by wearables such as fitbits or by internal graphene nanosensors)  through your phone.

You will receive a notification on your phone when it's time for your next gene edit shot.

They have a "fix" for everything.

You may need to visit the "human" (or AI generated personification) doc on Zoom and you will be directed to get the gene edit shot at your local Starbuck's or McDonald's or they may just drone deliver a self administered patch to your doorfront.

You will be geofenced in your home until you comply.

The evidence is out there and I'm trying to share it little by little but it's overwhelming to put all the pieces together so please do your own research and you will find that what I am saying is true.

I'll keep adding to the Blockchain Slavery thread.

Can someone explain how exactly it works that pain and misery bring about some kind of wonderful learning experience? It makes absolutely no sense to me.

Please stop pontificating as if you’re some king of expert rather just a hack who read a couple of articles on the internet and for whom there’s no conspiracy theory about Globohomo you won’t believe.

Maybe this is true.  Maybe it isn’t.  But it’s not because you say so.

You don’t realize how by promoting a bunch of nonsense you help discredit the entire Dissident Right ... as both Alex Jones and Donald Trump (your heroes) have done.

I'm not supporting the jab posting, but this was a bit too lacking in self-awareness that I made a go at fixing it for your own use.

Can someone explain how exactly it works that pain and misery bring about some kind of wonderful learning experience? It makes absolutely no sense to me.

Here's a couple of things on suffering that may be of help, BBB:

Article 3. Whether Baptism should take away the penalties of sin that belong to this life?
Objection 1. It seems that Baptism should take away the penalties of sin that belong to this life. For as the Apostle says (Romans 5:15), the gift of Christ is farther-reaching than the sin of Adam. But through Adam's sin, as the Apostle says (Romans 5:12), "death entered into this world," and, consequently, all the other penalties of the present life. Much more, therefore, should man be freed from the penalties of the present life, by the gift of Christ which is received in Baptism.
Objection 2. Further, Baptism takes away the guilt of both original and actual sin. Now it takes away the guilt of actual sin in such a way as to free man from all debt of punishment resulting therefrom. Therefore it also frees man from the penalties of the present life, which are a punishment of original sin.
Objection 3. Further, if the cause be removed, the effect is removed. But the cause of these penalties is original sin, which is taken away by Baptism. Therefore such like penalties should not remain.
On the contrary, on Romans 6:6, "that the body of sin may be destroyed," a gloss says: "The effect of Baptism is that the old man is crucified, and the body of sin destroyed, not as though the living flesh of man were delivered by the destruction of that concupiscence with which it has been bespattered from its birth; but that it may not hurt him, when dead, though it was in him when he was born." Therefore for the same reason neither are the other penalties taken away by Baptism.
I answer that, Baptism has the power to take away the penalties of the present life yet it does not take them away during the present life, but by its power they will be taken away from the just in the resurrection when "this mortal hath put on immortality" (1 Corinthians 15:54). And this is reasonable. First, because, by Baptism, man is incorporated in Christ, and is made His member, as stated above (Article 3; III:68:5). Consequently it is fitting that what takes place in the Head should take place also in the member incorporated. Now, from the very beginning of His conception Christ was "full of grace and truth," yet He had a passible body, which through His Passion and death was raised up to a life of glory. Wherefore a Christian receives grace in Baptism, as to his soul; but he retains a passible body, so that he may suffer for Christ therein: yet at length he will be raised up to a life of impassibility. Hence the Apostle says (Romans 8:11): "He that raised up Jesus Christ from the dead, shall quicken also our [Vulgate: 'your'] mortal bodies, because of His Spirit that dwelleth in us [Vulgate: 'you']": and further on in the same chapter (Romans 8:17): "Heirs indeed of God, and joint heirs with Christ: yet so, if we suffer with Him, that we may be also glorified with Him."
Secondly, this is suitable for our spiritual training: namely, in order that, by fighting against concupiscence and other defects to which he is subject, man may receive the crown of victory. Wherefore on Romans 6:6, "that the body of sin may be destroyed," a gloss says: "If a man after Baptism live in the flesh, he has concupiscence to fight against, and to conquer by God's help." In sign of which it is written (Judges 3:1-2): "These are the nations which the Lord left, that by them He might instruct Israel . . . that afterwards their children might learn to fight with their enemies, and to be trained up to war."
Thirdly, this was suitable, lest men might seek to be baptized for the sake of impassibility in the present life, and not for the sake of the glory of life eternal. Wherefore the Apostle says (1 Corinthians 15:19): "If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable."
Reply to Objection 1. As a gloss says on Romans 6:6, "that we may serve sin no longer—Like a man who, having captured a redoubtable enemy, slays him not forthwith, but suffers him to live for a little time in shame and suffering; so did Christ first of all fetter our punishment, but at a future time He will destroy it."
Reply to Objection 2. As the gloss says on the same passage (cf. ad 1), "the punishment of sin is twofold, the punishment of hell, and temporal punishment. Christ entirely abolished the punishment of hell, so that those who are baptized and truly repent, should not be subject to it. He did not, however, altogether abolish temporal punishment yet awhile; for hunger, thirst, and death still remain. But He overthrew its kingdom and power" in the sense that man should no longer be in fear of them: "and at length He will altogether exterminate it at the last day."
Reply to Objection 3. As we stated in I-II:81:1; I-II:82:1 ad 2 original sin spread in this way, that at first the person infected the nature, and afterwards the nature infected the person. Whereas Christ in reverse order at first repairs what regards the person, and afterwards will simultaneously repair what pertains to the nature in all men. Consequently by Baptism He takes away from man forthwith the guilt of original sin and the punishment of being deprived of the heavenly vision. But the penalties of the present life, such as death, hunger, thirst, and the like, pertain to the nature, from the principles of which they arise, inasmuch as it is deprived of original justice. Therefore these defects will not be taken away until the ultimate restoration of nature through the glorious resurrection.

https://www.newadvent.org/summa/4069.htm#article2

https://catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/Vianney%20Suffering.html

Your idiotic brainwashing regarding the entire Russia situation is rather pathetic.  I didn't realize there were so many morons among Traditional Catholics.  Sure, the entire world propaganda machine is turned against Russia, and yet we're the ones who have succuмed to propaganda.

The dissenting opinion to yours has been explained and sourced many times on the forum, but you evidently ignore it. I have never seen you attempt a meaningful response, but only vitriol.