Please stop pontificating as if you’re some king of expert rather just a hack who read a couple of articles on the internet and for whom there’s no conspiracy theory about the jab you won’t believe.

Maybe this is true.  Maybe it isn’t.  But it’s not because you say so.

You don’t realize how by promoting a bunch of nonsense you help discredit the entire anti-jab movement ... as both Stew Peters and Carrie Madej (your heroes) have done.

You can believe what you like about me, Lad, but Peters and Madej are no heroes of mine and I have posted a lot of negative information about them.  That doesn't mean that everything they report is untrue.

The information I'm sharing can be found at the WEF and DAVOS and elsewhere.  It's a very detailed plan that's out in the open so it's not a theory but you don't have to believe it if you don't want to.

Oh, here are the pages for the same videos I posted above that include numerous original source links added below the video:

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/whitney-webb-interview-starbucks-covid-connection-gamestop-suspicions-wef-cyber-pandemic-simulations/


https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/gov-docs-reveal-plan-to-alter-evolution-with-nanotech-the-eugenics-element-to-covid-19-policy/

Lad, just because someone doesn't buy one side of the propoganda doesn't mean the other side is true.  Really the true Catholic position would be to be against both sides of this.  Neither Russia or Jєωkraine are our friends.  We know "they" play both sides anyway and really we shouldn't be defending any government that is anti-Catholic.  All the opponents of what you're saying are getting at is that both sides have issues and from what I've seen they're NOT pro-Ukraine just because they're anti-Russia, people can be anti-Russia and anti-Jєωkraine and Catholics should be.  I usually don't post but I've been reading you guys bicker about all this for far too long. 

Miser, Lad does have a point about your posting, I think some of your posts are useful but perhaps you should screen your information more thoroughly before doing a huge data dump on here.  I wouldn't even post anything that Jєω Peters or his people even talks about and completely dismiss his and his organizations "information" completely because I think Lad and others are 100% spot on that he's a plant used to make the anti-Jab movement into a joke or too kooky and wacky so "they" can use that as a pretext later to censor "disinfo."

100% Agree.

Miser, Lad does have a point about your posting, I think some of your posts are useful but perhaps you should screen your information more thoroughly before doing a huge data dump on here.  I wouldn't even post anything that Jєω Peters or his people even talks about and completely dismiss his and his organizations "information" completely because I think Lad and others are 100% spot on that he's a plant used to make the anti-Jab movement into a joke or too kooky and wacky so "they" can use that as a pretext later to censor "disinfo."

No information was posted in this thread from Stew Peters.  Why was he brought up?

When I have posted an interview from Stew Peters in the past, and it's been a long time,  I have always included the original source docuмents often both a link and copying and pasting key segments and diagrams.  This has  included US Patents and medical journal studies or government docuмents.

Unfortunately people won't read the patents, medical journal studies or government docuмents and discuss them.  

They would rather discuss media personalities and right-left paradigm stuff than look at the cold, hard evidence itself.

There are so many intelligent people here and it would be great if some could read the actual US patents, Pubmed articles, government docuмents and other evidence and share and discuss what's in them rather than discuss video media personalities who sometimes present the evidence or me or other CI members.

I think it's scary facing this stuff and focusing on the video presenters or the CI member sharing the evidence rather than verifying the evidence for yourself is a way to avoid looking at it.

That's understandable.  It is very scary.  For me, I don't like scaring people but on the other hand, if people are not informed and are not sufficiently scared, they may go along with it unwittingly. 

We will all face very tough choices ahead.

For instance, Lad posted the Stew Peters snake in the water video.  Did anyone look up and try to verify or debunk the evidence for snake DNA transfection from the shots?  That would be useful information to research and discuss rather that Stew.

Anyway, with regards to the directed evolution/transhumanism discussion here is a docuмent people should become familiar with.  TLAV discusses it in the video I posted above.



The US National Science Foundation, US Department of Commerce, Hewlett Packard and others met back in 2001 to discuss how to create better humans.

They plan to direct evolution with gene editing and create a global brain.



"Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance" (CTIHP) is a 2002 report commissioned by the U.S. National Science Foundation and Department of Commerce. The report contains descriptions and commentaries on the state of the science and technology of the combined fields of nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (NBIC) by major contributors to these fields. Potential uses of these technologies in improving health and overcoming disability are discussed in the report, as well as ongoing work on planned applications of human enhancement technologies in the military and in rationalization of the human-machine interface in industrial settings.

Quotations
"Understanding of the mind and brain will enable the creation of a new species of intelligent machine systems that can generate economic wealth on a scale hitherto unimaginable. Within a half-century, intelligent machines might create the wealth needed to provide food, clothing, shelter, education, medical care, a clean environment, and physical and financial security for the entire world population. Intelligent machines may eventually generate the production capacity to support universal prosperity and financial security for all human beings. Thus, the engineering of the mind is much more than the pursuit of scientific curiosity. It is more even than a monumental technological challenge. It is an opportunity to eradicate poverty and usher in the golden age for all humankind."[1][2]







CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING HUMAN PERFORMANCE


.




Changing the societal “fabric” towards a new structure
(upper figure by R.E. Horn)

The integration and synergy of the four technologies (nano-bio-info-cogno) originate from the
nanoscale, where the building blocks of matter are established. This picture symbolizes the
confluence of technologies that now offers the promise of improving human lives in many ways, and
the realignment of traditional disciplinary boundaries that will be needed to realize this potential. New
and more direct pathways towards human goals are envisioned in working habits, in economic
activity, and in the humanities.


Table 1. Main improvement areas relative to an individual Relative position Improvement area External (outside the body), environmental
New products: materials, devices and systems, agriculture and food New agents: societal changes, organizations, robots, chat-bots, animals
New mediators: stationary tools and artifacts
New places: real, virtual, mixed External, collective Enhanced group interaction and creativity Unifying science education and learning External, personal
New mediators: mobile/wearable tools and artifacts

Internal (inside the body), temporary
New ingestible medicines, food

Internal, permanent
New organs: new sensors and effectors, implantables
New skills: converging technologies, new uses of old sensors and effectors
New genes: new genetics, cells



See the full docuмent here:
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/CONVERGING-TECHNOLOGIES-FOR-IMPROVING-HUMAN-PERFORMANCE-2002.pdf

A few important things to note regarding this report:

It does not come from the WEF, Klaus Schwab, Yuval Harari, China, Biden, Trump, Russia, Mark Zuckerberg, Stew Peters, Dr Madej....or me :)

It is a plan devised by our country.

The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT


The plan includes:

-Creating a new species of augmented humans

-Creating the Metaverse  (3 years before the founding of Facebook)

-Connecting everyone's brain to the Cloud both externally and  internally  (5 years before "the Cloud" was introduced to the public)

-Using both external wearbles and internal biosensors to send  everyone's medical data to the cloud for real time monitoring

-External wearbles included mobile devices (6 years before the iphone was introduced)

-Giving the populace gene editing shots


They expected to accomplish this in the next 10 to 20 years.

They met 21 years ago.

It's pretty clear they are well on their way to accomplishing their objectives.


I don't think this is just about making anti-vaxxers look dumb.

A few important things to note regarding this report:

It does not come from the WEF, Klaus Schwab, Yuval Harari, China, Biden, Trump, Russia, Mark Zuckerberg, Stew Peters, Dr Madej....or me :)

It is a plan devised by our country.

The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT


The plan includes:

-Creating a new species of augmented humans

-Creating the Metaverse  (3 years before the founding of Facebook)

-Connecting everyone's brain to the Cloud both externally and  internally  (5 years before "the Cloud" was introduced to the public)

-Using both external wearbles and internal biosensors to send  everyone's medical data to the cloud for real time monitoring

-External wearbles included mobile devices (6 years before the iphone was introduced)

-Giving the populace gene editing shots


They expected to accomplish this in the next 10 to 20 years.

They met 21 years ago.

It's pretty clear they are well on their way to accomplishing their objectives.


I don't think this is just about making anti-vaxxers look dumb.

The report from their meeting in 2001 is already discussing the plan for joint efforts between the government and venture capitalists (Private Public Partnerships), which is Stakeholder Capitalism, to bring about

"Enhanced Human Abilities and Societal Performance". 

This is what is now known as The Great Reset.


Some keyword searches

(hit control "f" on your keyboard and put the word in to search

helpful when approaching such a long docuмent as this)

include:

Wetware    
This is discussed a couple times in the report.
What is wetware?  Google it for more info.  There are two Wikipedia articles on it including Brain Wetware, and Biological Wetware

Cyborg   
There are 12 references to creating cyborgs in their plans.  

A few notable quotes:

Largely lost in the effort to downsize our digital hardware is the fact that every step forward
brings us closer to an era in which computers will routinely reside within us. Fantasy?
Hardly. We already implant electronics into the human body. But today‘s pacemakers,
cochlear implants, and the like will seem crude — not to mention huge — in the coming
years. And these few instances of electronic intervention will multiply dramatically… The
most pervasive, if least exciting, use of inner-body computing is likely to be for monitoring
our vital stats (heart rate, blood pressure, and so on) and communicating the same,
wirelessly, to a home healthcare station, physician‘s office, or hospital.

These types of docuмented plans and numerous other patents and government docuмents from Canada, Germany, Japan, UK,  as well as hundreds of medical journal docs and the dozens of instructional videos from healthcare corporations from the last decade, the many meetings and docuмents from the WEF/DAVOS, DARPA, RAND Corp,  the EU's multibillion dollar investment into graphene biosensor manufacturer Graphene Flagship, as well as what my young friend in the CRISPR lab explained to me 6 years ago are what make it quite reasonable to believe that graphene nanosensors are being injected into people.  (Much of this information I have docuмented at the graphene and blockchain slavery threads.)

So when I saw the graphene nanotech in the microscopy I wasn't at all surprised.  I've been waiting for them to roll this out.

However, while I have no doubt as to their plans, I still have not been able to confirm the actual bluetooth "maccinated" testing for myself, but I'm never out in public.
I've heard conflicting reports from people.  Yet, it's clear from the data collected at howbadismybatch.com there are many variations on what is being injected into people.  I believe they are running many real time experiments.  Plus there are ways to disable the function of the graphene sensors with such things as alcohol consumption and glutathione enhancing supplements.

With “wearable” computing, the machine comes closer to the body,

ultimately continuous with the body, and the human person is redefined as cyborg.

There are clips of Klaus Schwab stating the plan to start with wearables and then go internal.  They are all on the same page.

They discuss how people have a negative image of cyborgs because of science fiction.  Scientists have subsequently coined the term "Centaur" instead of cyborg to give better PR. They want people (especially the younger generation) to believe they will become super heroes.   And you wondered why they keep putting out movie after movie about superheroes!


For a bit more info, watch this video from Stanford University on the topic.  Their sensitivity to the use of the term "cyborg" doesn't extend to the use of the word "wetware" for some reason.  Not many are aware of what it means I guess.

This lady is ecstatic about her work and shares her experience building her first "Centaur".

Human 2.0: How to Build a Centaur & Why It’s Going to Change the World
39,236 views  Feb 5, 2018  From the November 1st, 2017 Human AI Collaboration: A Dynamic Frontier Conference; Amy Kruse, Chief Scientific Officer, Platypus Institute looks at...

1. The Centaur vision blends the analytical powers of the human brain with those of a computer to create a novel, super-powered system.
2. The most exciting uses of artificial intelligence technology will not be performing “black box” analytics, but rather bringing to life J.C.R. Licklider’s dream of “Human Computer Symbiosis.”
3. We understand the architecture, key components and data flows needed to actually build a Centaur.
4. The centaur approach will have an impact on many domains and exciting application areas.
22min



Funny, they used to have comments on that vid (I left a few myself)  but they seem to have turned them off for some reason.  

So I get it.  We think turning humans into robots, cyborgs, centaurs, whatever you want to call them, is kooky, wacky, wayyyyyy out there in the conspiracy world. 

We can comprehend the evil of chopping up aborted babies and selling the parts, world depopulation, sex trafficking and other horrors, but FRANKENSTEIN?

It's just too awful. 

Well, clearly the US Department of Commerce, Hewlitt Packard and the National Science Foundation don't think it's wacky or awful at all.  They think it's great! 


My young friend who worked in the CRISPR lab at Cedars Sinai Hospital in LA also thought it was great!  She said 6 years ago,

"Things are about to get soooo much better.  People have no idea how advanced technology is.  We can cure cancer and just about any disease.  We will soon be connected to the cloud by graphene biosensors so our internal organs will be monitored and our phone will tell us when it's time to get a shot for CRISPR gene editing or to have nanobots perform surgery.  Those videos on Youtube are only barely scratching the surface. People can live well into their second century and be healthy!"

It didn't occur to her that this technology could be used for evil or that she would lose her humanity.

There are numerous "future of healthcare" videos explaining the plan so many people already know about this and think it's going to be wonderful.


There's a saying that when the product is free the product is you.

As you can see from the Enhanced Human Abilities and Societal Performance docuмent from their meeting in 2001 which I posted above they have rolled out lots of free technology according to their plans.

Free World Wide Web (collecting your data and creating a cashless society)
Free Search Engines (collecting your data and monitoring you)
Free Phones (remember the Obama phone--they want every person to have one--even bushmen in Africa have been given cell phones now---it's essential to their plan)
Free Social Media sites like Facebook and Twitter
Free Metaverse  (creating DIGITAL TWINS)
Free Gene Editing Shots Worldwide


It's all a part of the plan.

Why would the Department of Commerce want people to have "enhanced human abilities"?  Better workers!  China, France and the US have admitted to having supersoldier programs.  Many suspect China already has factory workers with "enhanced human abilities" such as needing less food and less sleep in remote parts of the country the rest of the world never gets to see.  There was a clip that was viral a while back but I can't find it now but the scientist explains how they can indeed create humans who need less food or sleep with gene editing which he fully believed benefits society.  Anyway that could be how they pay them .50 an hour with incredible production rates without revolts.  I have a vid on that but won't post it because it's about the bikini industry.

Why would they want better "societal performance"?  They go into that in the 2001 docuмent with precrime analytics and behavior surveillance.  The control grid. Your location. Your phone will be able to tell by your voice, heartbeat etc. if you are lying or angry, etc.  Be a good citizen!


Here is a clip from the University of Texas Austin:


Creating a digital twin so humans can be connected to the internet in the metaverse.  Humans can't compete with robots so they have to become robots--Elon Musk.  She thinks it's wonderful!

Clip - UT Austin Professor Nanshu Lu Presents On Soft Bioelectronics and Human-Centered Robots

13min 12 sec



Here is Jennifer Doudna (she was referenced in posts towards the beginning of this thread) explaining just a tiny bit of what CRISPR can do at the WEF
5min 26sec



For those who want to take a deep dive on this, here is a five and a half hour presentation from a Mom who dug up the research.  It was scrubbed from Youtube but it's still up on Odysee:

DIGITAL EMPIRE: The War on Humanity and Natural Life
https://odysee.com/@Argusfest:b/Alison_Nano:e

Here are the slides:

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZDinpMvQ_iEKYwX9XRLGSqYQ5SgWUKAS55wt5CRfMh4/edit?usp=sharing


Anyway, even though this is scary, I think it's important to understand as mandatory vaccines loom over the horizon.

Personally, I'd rather starve and I want to have a very detailed visual of why exactly I'm choosing to starve rather than give them my biometrics to create my DIGITAL TWIN or become one of their HUMAN 2.0 robots!

I'm also getting rid of my phone and will go offline soon.