Why do you say it was censored? When was this speech given?

In the same way that it is necessary to know and use a demon's name in order to exorcise it, the institutions that need replacing all need to be specifically named, in order for the political will to be properly focused, to do its job.

In this vid, Trump mentions no specifics. He could be talking about the US Federal Reserve, the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, the Bank for International Settlements -- or he could be talking about Citibank, Bank of America, and the Washington Post.

The problems stem from Freemasonic (Luciferian) Fondi central banking families that have been in power since the Crusades. They run the 162 private central banks, one in nearly every country. They are more powerful than any government and no laws apply to them. They are unelected and have the ability to print money (through the sale of bonds created out of thin air), at will. They own nearly everything.

I suspect they own not just Hillary, but also Trump, as well as Infowars.com. If Trump is not planning on un-doing the power of the Fondi, then all this talk is simply nonsense. He has no power to attack them, anyhow. They would destroy him in the blink of an eye.

It is public awareness and education that threatens their power, only. That, and the will of God.

I have never heard illuminati referred to as 'Fondi'. Could you give a reference for this???  :confused1:

Here is an excellent written account --
http://www.abeldanger.net/2010/11/new-financial-term-fondi-switzerland-is.html

Lyndon LaRouche on this topic --


William Stuart on this topic --


Webster Tarpley on this topic. Note that Tarpley used to do much of the research on this topic for LaRouche, as part of his global intelligence network.

Also, the mainstream media won't air this speech by Trump because they know it will attract undecided voters and Bernie-supporters, and wake up a few LibTards.

 :confused1:

These speeches are all over the place. After I posed the question to you, I looked it up myself. This video won't get aired because it's a mash-up of several different speeches.

Parts from Florida:
http://www.npr.org/2016/10/13/497857068/transcript-donald-trumps-speech-responding-to-assault-accusations

...other parts from Gettysburg and some other places.

The video is quite good. The person who made it certainly has a better understanding of what people care about and what they don't than Trump does. You can follow along with the actual speech and see than whenever Trump goes on a tangent about something personal or adds in unnecessary phrases, the video maker skips that part of the speech.

...and, yes, the video maker takes liberties in deciding what exactly Trump was talking about when he says things in an unspecific manner.