The main critique of Vigano is that his "children of light" grouping is too large. Ok, so what? Clearly, the critique misses the overall point of Vigano in that the "children of dark" are the masons and luciferians who want to usher in the anti-christ. So, it is obvious that those who are not masons/devil-worshippers he labels as the "children of light", a point which is debatable but hardly an untruth. The critique again misses the point that if the masons/modernists were cleared from the church, then a large majority of baptized christians/catholics would return to the Truth. Does that mean they would all become saints and save their soul? No, but at least they would have a better chance than they do now, in the V2 belief-system. This critique is full of pessimism, negativity and Trad uppity-ness. In the search for perfection, they ignore the good.