Neo-traditionalism is a variety of neo-conservatism, which was created by ex-Trotskyites with a Zionist agenda. It is absolutely subversive.
For those who think Zionism wasn't born out of the Left, David Ben-Gurion was a Marxist.
http://forward.com/articles/147083/secrets-of-ben-gurions-leadership/?p=allHere it is recounted he says he preferred Lenin to Trotsky. Of course Ben Gurion was head of the Zionist Labor party.
Looking at Bishop Fellay's new associates, with their fondness for Zionism, (who chose Bishop Williamson's defense counsel from the ranks of a left-wing party) we begin to understand the change in policy, a policy that seeks a place in what Archbishop Lefebvre called "the revolutionary world government."
It is obvious that if many bishops had acted like Mgr. de Castro-Mayer, Bishop of Campos in Brazil, the ideological revolution within the Church could have been limited, because we must not be afraid to affirm that the current Roman authorities, since John XXIII and Paul VI, have made themselves active collaborators of international Jєωιѕн Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and of world socialism. John Paul II is above all a communist-loving politician at the service of a world communism retaining a hint of religion. He openly attacks all of the anti-communist governments and does not bring, by his travels, any Catholic revival.
http://www.sspx.ca/Communicantes/Aug2001/Spiritual_Journey.htmThe reality is that Archbishop Lefebvre would be shocked to see
The Remnant tell us of "The Lessons of Hanukkah." He would be completely shocked at Bishop Fellay's ridiculous comments about how he supposedly learned that errors in the Council weren't really errors in the text, that "religious liberty" is limited. He would be shocked at the ostracism of one of his consecrated bishops for the sake of cozying up to Jєωιѕн groups who demand
Nostra Aetate be accepted. He would be amazed that any fake Catholics would have the audacity to claim to be "unimpeachable Catholics" while publicly admiring blasphemers such as Madonna. He would be amazed that it would be permitted for such a fake to publicly, shamelessly defend "miniskirts" as being modest dress and still be permitted a role in the society.
This is all very obvious.