Who have I judged the Soul of, exactly?

I am addressing YOU AND YOUR FACTION OF ABSOLUTIST FANATICS.

Read carefully.  

We are free to judge observable actions against God's Law, but NOT the state of anyone's soul.

We are NOT free to judge intent.  Notwithstanding your habitual mis-judgments you are not in a position to know what is in anyone's mind or the state of their souls.

As for YOU personally, I accuse YOU of judging INTENT. You have no access to the minds of others.  You are in no position to know the medical conditions of strangers. You are therefore in no legitimate position to claim you know "their true intent is to get high." You are in no position to claim as you have, my true intent is to "make Catholicism look bad," advance occultism/satanism, etc.

Are you a moron?

I don't like red shoes and I don't like lima beans. There is no implication that red shoes and lima beans are the same.

There is a similarity between reading intent and reading souls; neither the minds nor the souls of others are accessible to you.  That does not mean souls and minds are identical.

Are you a moron?

I don't like red shoes and I don't like lima beans. There is no implication that red shoes and lima beans are the same.

There is a similarity between reading intent and reading souls; neither the minds nor the souls of others are accessible to you.  That does not mean souls and minds are identical.

Another question: you have accused me in the past of reading the souls of people who are (supposedly) needful of pot for medicinal reasons. How does that work, exactly? How can I read or judge the souls of people whom I have never met, or heard of, and don't know at all? Do you have any theological backing for this idea?

“These “traditional Catholic” men need to grow up and quit smoking weed.  We all need to put our trust in God instead of diets, big pharma, marijuana, cigarettes etc.

Traditional Catholic men need to make God, wife and children a priority.  These men need to rely on God to help Him clean out His Church and get rid of these pedophile priests and other imposters.  

Something else I'd like to ask. Are you quite sure that we can never judge intent from a person's own words and/or actions?

Never with absolute certainty.

Only God can judge intent with certainty.

“These “traditional Catholic” men need to grow up and quit smoking weed.  They need to rely on God to help Him clean out His Church and get rid of these pedophile priests. 

"These 'traditional Catholic' opponents of medical marijuana need to stop abusing their children."

Moron. 

I do not smoke or otherwise partake. Except for Roscoe everyone else says they personally eschew weed.

You can see the difference. When I make an accusation, I provide quotes and even links.

prurient

• constant harping on the “true intent” of medical patients to “get high,” piling on to LT’s habitual “leg spreader” obsession

“sins of the flesh, but they seem to believe that because they are trads and attend the TLM, that this will make them holy, and not subject to the laws and justice of Our Lord.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/oxymoron-catholics-for-recreational-use-of-marijuana/msg813628/#msg813628


disordered

• habitually reads the interior forum of medical patients, “true intent" to "get high"

• habitually reads the interior forum of opponents, true intent to "make Catholicism look bad," advance occultism/satanism, etc. [see the numerous insane accusations cited below]

• habitually reads the interior forum of strangers, including the Catholic world at large

“Fitting in with the world is a good thing to many trads… Most give in.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/pope-to-consecrate-russiaukraine-on-march-25!/msg813582/#msg813582


rabid, hysterical

“he seems mentally unbalanced… mentally unhinged” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/spewing-bitter-vile-personal-attacks/msg817027/#msg817027

“Mark 79 is a bully and a brute” https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/marijuana-use-sinful-for-catholics/msg812838/#msg812838

“crusade … marijuana is snake oil disguised as a miracle substance given by God to save humanity…  it has miraculous or supernatural powers, which is a little too close to believing in the occult. Such thinking is not of God. Marijuana cannot save humanity. Only Our Lord can do that.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/ban-marijuana-discussions-from-ci/msg817018/#msg817018

“on a crusade to show that pot can only be used for good” https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/alasdair-crowley's-use-of-cannabis-in-occult-ritual/msg816837/#msg816837

“most pharisaical of all” https://www.cathinfo.com/members-only/people-smoked-weed-before-mass/msg816400/#msg816400

“…Mark79 is intentionally and knowingly trying to make Traditional Catholicism look bad” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/please-pray-for-mark79/msg813886/#msg813886

“If [traditional Catholics] were truly looking for sanctity, they would not support someone like [Mark 7:9]. But they do. Meaning that they (at least on this forum) are not any better than Novus Ordo Catholics. …they are not Catholic.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/please-pray-for-mark79/msg813883/#msg813883

“…yes, the type of vitriol that Mark79 dishes out does reveal who he truly is; hence, perhaps, the recent posting by him on this thread - in order to make himself look like a really nice guy (which he clearly isn't). Trouble is, most of the forum members like it. They like (even the forum owner) the nastiness of Mark79. They can't get enough of it.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/please-pray-for-mark79/msg813878/#msg813878

“many of the forum members seem to enjoy it when he insults others in an extreme manner.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/please-pray-for-mark79/msg813875/#msg813875

“So pot isn't necessary for salvation? Are you sure about that?” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/oxymoron-catholics-for-recreational-use-of-marijuana/msg813676/#msg813676

“But then we do have a resident manipulator and bully on this forum who enforces this assumption, and who strives to ensure that NO ONE goes against his directives.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/what's-the-purpose-of-smoking-marijuana-for-recreation/msg813316/#msg813316

“You know, you needn't be afraid to admit that you have Zionist parents.” https://www.cathinfo.com/members-only/world-war-3-folks/msg812657/#msg812657

Agreed with: “Mark 79, you're as phony as Obama's birth certificate … humiliate, demoralize and degrade the unfortunate catholic reader/ viewer.  You're a crypto Jєω.” https://www.cathinfo.com/members-only/this-whole-ukraine-thing-stinks/msg812416/#msg812416


ignorant

• ignores dozens of cited studies showing the safety and benefits of MJ

• relies on personal experiences, ignores large-scale, placebo-controlled double-blind studies

“I saw it when in high school in the '70's, and later with family members who smoked pot. One cannot improve their life if they smoke pot. Quite the opposite. And it leads to sin. “ https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/ban-marijuana-discussions-from-ci/msg817019/#msg817019

“I had pothead friends” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/oxymoron-catholics-for-recreational-use-of-marijuana/msg813641/#msg813641

“I cannot cite anything other than my personal experience with potheads (plural, not singular).” https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/marijuana-use-sinful-for-catholics/msg812654/#msg812654


illogical

• pretends that the safety and benefits of MJ shown in medical studies is irrelevant to social use of MJ

• has not acknowledged the greater toxicity of alcohol

• cites a med school dropout for medical matters, denies peer-reviewed studies

• cites a pederast enabler who violated the law requiring reporting of sɛҳuąƖ abuse for moral theology, denies a moral theologian and canonist

insane straw man caricatures

“Everything should be legal, in your view, with no restrictions or special taxes.” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/what's-the-purpose-of-smoking-marijuana-for-recreation/msg813665/#msg813665

“trads believe themselves to be above the law?” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/oxymoron-catholics-for-recreational-use-of-marijuana/msg813633/#msg813633

“saying that there's nothing wrong with smoking pot recreationally” https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/what's-the-purpose-of-smoking-marijuana-for-recreation/msg813439/#msg813439

“traditional Catholics here find it offensive that some of us do not agree that recreational pot-smoking is a good thing, and not a problem at all.”

“Both Sedism and potheadism are novelities, supported by supposed trads.… The Bully are sedes.
” https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/marijuana-use-sinful-for-catholics/msg812854/#msg812854

“Who is it that paid you to interview hundreds of MJ users?” https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/marijuana-use-sinful-for-catholics/msg812649/#msg812649


connects MJ with sedevacantism

“…five downvotes, but I suspect that it's from Mark 79's fellow sedes. They don't want their boy to be 'dissed. “ https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/marijuana-use-sinful-for-catholics/msg812839/#msg812839

“If you were not a sede, would you really have that opinion [on MJ]?”  https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/marijuana-use-sinful-for-catholics/msg812838/#msg812838

connects MJ with abortion https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/marijuana-use-sinful-for-catholics/msg812837/#msg812837

connecting MJ with bestiality
"Yes [Pedophilia and bestality]" https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/top-senate-democrats-finalize-pro-cannabis-bill/msg817306/#msg817306

You DO judge people continually with absolute certainty. Not only do you judge people on this forum who disagree with you with absolute certainty, but also on your judaism blog. That's what your blog is all about. Judging intent with certainty. But no one else is allowed to judge intent. Only you.

If I do anything "continually," providing verbatim examples would surely be effortless.