Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
First of all Tradman, the Catholic Encyclopedia was written by men, not by infallible popes. Go read the Galileo story in any Catholic encyclopedia since 1913 and you will read the illusion that the Church got it wrong. Here is the most accurate account of the antipodes found anywhere:https://d2y1pz2y630308.cloudfront.net/21425/docuмents/2018/10/SVhistory-stvirgil.pdf"A second difference between Boniface and Virgil entailed more serious charges. In his earlier years in Ireland, Virgil had been recognized for his knowledge of astronomy and mathematics. In those days when little was known about the physical world and its nature, Virgil, far in advance of his contemporaries, satisfied himself that the world was round and that people lived on the other side of it. In 748 Boniface reported to the Pope accusing Virgil of ambiguous and even false teaching about men on the other side of the world. Boniface apparently interpreted Virgil as saying that if men resided on the other side of the world; they might not be of a race descended from Adam. In short, this was to deny that these people could be redeemed by Christ, since Christ redeemed all the descendants of Adam. This was a serious charge. If true, Virgil could have been condemned and deprived of his faculties. The Pope's reply was that Boniface should prove that Virgil actually taught this doctrine. If so, Boniface was to convoke a council and drive Virgil from the Church. "Whatever became of these charges is somewhat of of a mystery. It is hardly likely that Vigil was guilty of any such doctrine. Since neither Boniface nor the Pope knew astronomy as well as Virgil did, it is very probable that they simply misunderstood his teaching. Whether Virgil actually clarified his statements or satisfactorily explained them to the Pope is not known. All that is certain is that the matter died. Virgil continued his work in Salzburg and his missionary activity in Austria. Boniface turned to missionary activity in Frisia (now Holland) and was martyred there in 754. Had Virgil been found guilty of false teachings, it is hardly likely that he would have been consecrated bishop, as he was."
St. Virgil recanted nothing, only maybe in your flat head fantasy.
You really cannot resist, can you?
Tradman, St. Virgil wasn't condemned by Pope Zacharias, but rather was made Bishop of Salzburg and later canonized as a Saint of the Church.St. Virgil recanted nothing, only maybe in your flat head fantasy.You're a ridiculous flat head, talking nonsense about Saints of the Church. You should recant.
No one said Virgil was condemned by the Pope. That he quit teaching nonsense is evident or he wouldn't have been made bishop. Ad hominem attacks don't do your model a bit of good.
The Pope's reply was that Boniface should prove that Virgil actually taught this doctrine. If so, Boniface was to convoke a council and drive Virgil from the Church.
Tradman admitted he was fooled with respect to St. Thomas Aquinas. But now he goes on as if he himself and CI readers didn't know he's fooled by anti-christian sources, calling themselves flat head resistance trads.
Where are you getting that Virgil recanted or "quit teaching nonsense"? Here's another possibility: he never taught nonsense.
I defend a Saint of the Church mocked and lied about by Tradman anytime.
Boniface complained to the Pope about Virgil's nonsense. The Pope got pretty ticked and sent Boniface to take care of it. Virgil likely quit doing it. Or he would have been driven from the Church.
In 748 Boniface reported to the Pope accusing Virgil of ambiguous and even false teaching about men on the other side of the world. Boniface apparently interpreted Virgil as saying that if men resided on the other side of the world; they might not be of a race descended from Adam. In short, this was to deny that these people could be redeemed by Christ, since Christ redeemed all the descendants of Adam. This was a serious charge. If true, Virgil could have been condemned and deprived of his faculties.
It's pretty sad that you have to resort to being rude when you can no longer defend your position. At least I was honest enough to admit when I was mistaken.
Crybaby Wah Wah