Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Off topic. This is not about movement but about shape.
Gee, so if you have a subject that favors flat earth it is "off topic"? Pay no attention, nothing to see here...I thought the OP said the topic was a that "Flat Earth Theory is likely a disinfo campaign".I'm just giving some ideas to the contrary.....I'm allowed to stick my thoughts in anywhere- your choice to ignore them.
Report her to the authorities.
Well, shape is congruent to movement. A flat earth could not hurtle like a spinning globe, y'think? All connected
Your subject doesn't favor flat earth. You just act as if globe earthers were per se heliocentrists, which is not the case.
Yes- the subject absolutely does! The predictability of the stars is NOT possible in a spinning globe earth. Geo or heliocentric
Quo Vadis, that video was full of half-truths. He kept saying we can't see the curvature because the earth is "so big" yet he ignores accepted scientific facts that the curve should be seen at 30+ miles easily (i.e. from the skyscraper in Houston). He only showed the lack of curvature when at "sea level" because, obviously, the lower you are, the harder it is to see very far. 5 minutes in, this video was a joke.
The map doesn't show all of the supposed continents -- that is the point. Antarctica is missing.
Not a fan of Sungenis. There is a lot that doesn't work . The stars are one of them