Yeah, so the first problem is that about 100 of the current 135 "voting" "Cardinals" were appointed by Jorge.  So, for the Bennyvacantists, they need to address the implications of this.

You have Barnhardt over here still clinging to the "non-resignationist" (munus vs. ministerium) argument.  Newsflash, Ann.  Ratzinger is dead.  So she has to address the problem of whether Universal Acceptance of Jorge would not validate his papacy (i.e. provide a sanatio) ... as many would believe.

But the Bennyvacantists don't address either of these problems.  They won't and/or can't think beyond the "Jorge is not the pope" proposition.

“Further, if ever it should appear that any bishop (even one acting as an archbishop, patriarch or primate), or a cardinal of the Roman Church, or a legate (as mentioned above), or even the Roman Pontiff (whether prior to his promotion to cardinal, or prior to his election as Roman Pontiff), has beforehand deviated from the Catholic faith or fallen into any heresy, We enact, decree, determine and define:
— “Such promotion or election in and of itself, even with the agreement and unanimous consent of all the cardinals, shall be null, legally invalid and void.
— “It shall not be possible for such a promotion or election to be deemed valid or to be valid, neither through reception of office, consecration, subsequent administration, or possession, nor even through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff himself, together with the veneration and obedience accorded him by all.
— “Such promotion or election, shall not through any lapse of tune in the foregoing situation, be considered even partially legitimate in any way . . .
— “Each and all of the words, as acts, laws, appointments of those so promoted or elected —and indeed, whatsoever flows therefrom — shall be lacking in force, and shall grant no stability and legal power to anyone whatsoever.
— “Those so promoted or elected, by that very fact and without the need to make any further declaration, shall be deprived of any dignity, position, honor, title, authority, office and power.”

Benedict or Bergoglio?

I understand not everyone in the "Resistance" is enamored with +Vigano. 

I would imagine that St. Peter let it be known that Linus would make a good successor, but that the college of bishops elected a new pope at the death of St. Peter in 69.A.D.  It is interesting that St. Peter did not choose St. John the Divine as his successor, as he was Our Lady's priest and obviously still living.

But it seems that many Catholics have this mistaken idea that the college of Cardinals is incapable of electing a malicious bishop, and I do not see it.  Going back to the Siri thesis, if Siri was elected, but told the Cardinal dean, "non accepto," because he felt his life was threatened, and then the cardinals said to themselves, "Well, we know that Siri is a good candidate, and he is conservative, but the liberals will probably kill him, so we are going to elect Roncalli, even though he is a liberal."  Why is this not a valid election?  At the end of the day, if the cardinals are liberal, then we are stuck with a liberal pope.  The only escape from this dilemma is to pray harder for an orthodox pope. 

These modern popes present a special difficulty because of the new rites of priesthood and episcopal consecration.

The Liber Pontificalis^[8] also enumerated Linus as the second bishop of Rome after Peter, and stated that Peter consecrated two bishops, Linus and Anacletus, for the priestly service of the community...

My suspicion is that the narrative could be that Benedict secretly appointed Vigano as pope before he died.

Just a hunch.

Pius X delivered a hammer blow:

"It took three centuries for the Church to evolve. The Jews therefore had time to acknowledge his divinity without any pressure. But they haven't done so to this day."

Check mate.

Yes, I also like this part:

And I have always been on good terms with Jєωs. Only the other evening two Jєωs were here to see me. After all, there are other bonds than those of religion: courtesy and philanthropy. These we do not deny to the Jєωs. Indeed, we also pray for them: that their minds be enlightened. This very day the Church is celebrating the feast of an unbeliever who, on the road to Damascus, became miraculously converted to the true faith. And so, if you come to Palestine and settle your people there, we shall have churches and priests ready to baptize all of you."

Shucks... I thought the OP was about the founder of ...