From an e-mail I received:

Einstein fled Hitler's Germany in 1933 not because he was Jєωιѕн, but because he was a politically active Marxist! Einstein held membership in more Communist front groups than one could shake a hammer and sickle at.

Einstein the fraud was a self described "pacifist". However, during the 1930's, the "pacifist" suddenly became an fierce advocate for total war against Germany! The famous Einstein-Szilard letter, in which the two Jєωιѕн scientists urge the Jєω owned President Roosevelt to develop an atomic weapon, was actually written during peacetime in August of 1939!  The letter falsely accuses Germany of developing an atomic bomb (the original WMD's Lie!) and urges FDR to beat Hitler to the punch.

Einstein condemned Nationalism (except for Israeli nationalism) and was very open in his support for a One World Government. He wrote, "There is no salvation for civilization, or even the human race, other than the creation of a world government."

Georges Lemaitre was the better scientist and much better soul.

Einstein may even have been a plagiarist.

Not maybe have been........he WAS a plagiarist;

In his 1907 paper, Einstein spelled out his views on plagiarism:

"It appears to me that it is the nature of the business that what follows has already been partly solved by other authors. Despite that fact, since the issues of concern are here addressed from a new point of view, I am entitled to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature..."

With this statement, Einstein declared that plagiarism, suitably packaged, is an acceptable research tool.

Here is the definition of "to plagiarize" from an unimpeachable source, Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language, Second Edition, Unabridged, 1947, p. 1,878:

"To steal or purloin and pass off as one's own (the ideas, words, artistic productions, etc. of one another); to use without due credit the ideas, expressions or productions of another. To commit plagiarism".

Isn't this exactly what Einstein did?

Giving due credit involves two aspects: timeliness and appropriateness. Telling the world that Lorentz provided the basis for special relativity 30 years after the fact is not timely (see below), is not appropriate and is not giving due credit. Nothing Einstein wrote ex post facto with respect to Lorentz's contributions alters the fundamental act of plagiarism.

The true nature of Einstein's plagiarism is set forth in his 1935 paper, "Elementary Derivation of the Equivalence of Mass and Energy", where, in a discussion on Maxwell, he wrote,

"The question as to the independence of those relations is a natural one because the Lorentz transformation, the real basis of special relativity theory..."

So, Einstein even acknowledged that the Lorentz transformation was the real basis of his 1905 paper.

 

Anyone who doubts that he was a plagiarist should ask one simple question:

"What did Einstein know and when did he know it?" Einstein got away with premeditated plagiarism, not the incidental plagiarism that is ubiquitous.


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm

Einstein....





 and Oppenheimer were both zionist.




Their Rothschild directed "zionist mission" was to make the Golem bomb for Israel at the US taxpayer's expense.




And demonstrate it on the largest Catholic Cathedral in Asia.



Urakami Cathedral (Nagasaki) before 1945 nuclear attack.



Urakami Cathedral (Nagasaki) after 1945 nuclear attack.