Author Topic: The true Nature of the American Constitution (Read 9899 times)

Emerentiana · « **Reply #30 on:** August 27, 2010, 08:15:49 PM »

Pius X!! was a manifest heretic ONLY IN YOUR OPINION. The church has never ruled on any of the popes from PIUS X11 until the present ones. That means your ruling doesnt carry any weight! Do you understand? You are a layman......layman dont have any authority to make these kind of pronouncements, and thereby influence others! Forum! This man is 29 years old! Wow! in 29 years (most of them lived as a Protestant) you think you have the authority to calumniate the Popes! What audacity and PRIDE! :heretic:

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #31 on:** August 27, 2010, 08:22:44 PM »

Quote from: CM

That a manifest heretic cannot hold/loses ecclesiastical office.

Like I said, you act as if you are right on every subject. If you think you're stance on religion is more important and reliable than the Pope, then it shows you likely think you're Pope. Not once have I ever seen you admit when you were wrong. Probably because you think you are never wrong when it comes to religion! You take sedevacanism to an extreme level, a level which is no longer considered sedevacanism, but rather extremism. It boarders on insanity.

CM · « **Reply #32 on:** August 27, 2010, 08:48:34 PM »

How blind you are then. What do you think the words "retractions and clarifications" mean (hint: they show up in all of my posts)?

You seem to want me to think I'm a pope or that I have authority or make "pronouncements" (rather than come to epistemological conclusions), even though I do not. You are creating a fictional version of me in your mind which to assault, but that has no basis in reality.

innocenza · « **Reply #33 on:** August 27, 2010, 11:15:55 PM »

Spiritus Sanctus, Emerentiana --

What is or is not extremism is a matter of JUDGMENT.

If your Catholic argumentation is wholly based on appeal to authority, and you do not admit the possibility that some circuмstances require the faithful to use private judgment, then I would think you are not/could not be 'sedevacantists'.

The conclusions CM draws out from the evidence he presents, are also judgments, although he may consider them to be proofs.

What is a rightly intentioned Catholic to do? At each individual's Judgment, will he be able he justify himself on the ground he followed a FALSE authority

You are all making things too SIMPLE.

MyrnaM · « **Reply #34 on:** August 28, 2010, 08:45:15 AM »

CM, why is it so important to you, to try and prove what you are saying about past popes, don't you realize that someone coming to your blog will be turned off by the Catholic faith.

Why not, try to foster Catholic ideals today, and what they must do to save their souls, how to restore grace within their souls. Isn't life today already too messed up, in that no one or hardly anyone knows where to go, just to find Our Lady who will take them to her Son.

Just imagine a person thinking of the Catholic Faith, and reading your blog, their faith is already infant, or weak, and now after reading what you say about past popes, they back away. That is not what God wants of anyone of us.

The point is you have no authority to say, past popes were heretics, in Gods time, these things will be sorted out.

My advise is to explain Our Blessed mother to those who do not understand her. Use your blog for that!