Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism  (Read 294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RomanCatholic1953

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10512
  • Reputation: +3267/-207
  • Gender: Male
  • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism
« on: April 22, 2020, 10:27:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Offline donkath

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1517
    • Reputation: +616/-116
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Re: The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism
    « Reply #1 on: April 22, 2020, 11:07:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wednesday, 22 April 2020

    Barr: DOJ May Side with Citizens Who Sue States Over Virus Lockdowns





    Attorney General Bill Barr said this week that the Department of Justice might side with citizens who sue state governments over coronavirus restrictions, suggesting that some of these policies may go too far.

    Speaking on the Hugh Hewitt radio showabout legal issues raised by state lockdown orders, Barr compared some of the polices to “house arrest” and said they could lead to situations in which the federal government would get involved.


    “Our federal constitutional rights don’t go away in an emergency. They constrain what the government can do,” Barr told Hewitt. “And in a circuмstance like this, they put on the government the burden to make sure that whatever burdens it’s putting on our constitutional liberties are strictly necessary to deal with the problem.


    “They have to be targeted,” he continued. “They have to use less intrusive means if they are equally effective in dealing with the problem. And that’s the situation we’re in today. We’re moving into a period where we have to do a better job of targeting the measures we’re deploying to deal with this virus.”


    The attorney general went on to say that the “idea that you have to stay in your house is disturbingly close to house arrest.” While he did not write off lockdown orders completely, he called them “impingements on liberty” that should make way to “more targeted approaches” as the infection curve begins to flatten.


    Hewitt suggested that rather than merely protest, those who are dissatisfied with state violations of constitutional liberties should sue. Barr agreed and asserted that the Justice Department would closely examine such cases and potentially support the citizens in some of them.


    Said Barr:
    Well, if people bring those lawsuits, we’ll take a look at it at that time. And if we think it’s, you know, justified, we would take a position. That’s what we’re doing now. We, you know, we’re looking carefully at a number of these rules that are being put into place.


    And if we think one goes too far, we initially try to jawbone the governors into rolling them back or adjusting them. And if they’re not and people bring lawsuits, we file [a] statement of interest and side with the plaintiffs.


    Barr argued that beyond the violation of constitutional rights by state governments, the federal government could get involved on grounds of the Commerce Clause, which gives Congress the power to “regulate Commerce … among the several states.”


    “So it is possible that governors will take measures that impair interstate commerce. And just where that line is drawn, you know, remains to be seen,” Barr told Hewitt, though he said he has not yet seen any violations of the Commerce Clause.


    Barr’s comments earned him criticism from Democratic leaders, who, ironically, rebuked him for allegedly wanting to trample over the authority of states.


    “So much for states’ rights. I mean I think they’ll be way off base. I think he will lose legally. And his view of an overarching almost monarchical president never ceases to amaze me,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters.


    House Speaker Nancy Peℓσѕι (D-Calif.) said she feels Barr is going “into a place that I think even the public knows doesn’t make sense.”


    The coronavirus pandemic has led to a heated struggle between governments and liberty-minded patriots, who are concerned with government overreach.


    In addition to forcing businesses to shut down and obligating citizens to stay in their homes, some states and localities have enforced their lockdowns with Chinese-manufactured drones and cellphone data-tracking technology. The outbreak has also been used as an argument by those who wish to impose universal compulsory vaccines and mandatory medical ID cards.


    Even as the freedom of law-abiding Americans is restricted and mothers are being arrested for playing in the park with their young children, a number of governments have responded to the pandemic by releasing criminals onto the streets, some of whom have gone on to commit new crimes.


    As a result, protests have sprung up around the country. A group calling for the reopening of Virginiaspoke of the economic toll shutdowns are taking on citizens’ livelihoods. “Business owners are being forced to layoff employees while the unemployment system is failing those laid off as the economy free falls” the group wrote in a statement.


    Recently, a New Jersey woman who organized a protest was arrested. But President Trump has expressed sympathy for lockdown protesters.
    If push comes to shove, can patriots count on having a legal ally in the White House?


    The New American
    "In His wisdom," says St. Gregory, "almighty God preferred rather to bring good out of evil than never allow evil to occur."


    Offline RomanCatholic1953

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10512
    • Reputation: +3267/-207
    • Gender: Male
    • I will not respond to any posts from Poche.
    Re: The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism
    « Reply #2 on: April 23, 2020, 09:38:11 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I heard on a Radio Program one doctor saying that over 80,000 people died of the regular flu in 2017,
    mostly older people age 80 and older.  The Country and the World's economy was not shut down.
    With the all the information I seen this was very well planned by the ruling elites to bring us into a
    one world government.  They have no conscience in what they are doing and the permanent
    damage they are causing.

    Offline donkath

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1517
    • Reputation: +616/-116
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Re: The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism
    « Reply #3 on: April 24, 2020, 12:00:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Quote
    This sounds good, but wonder about providing mobile phone number(?)



    Dear Friend,

    Regardless of your standing about vaccines, now is the time to educate yourself so you can make informed decisions for yourself and your family before they release the covid-19 vaccine.

    Below is the link to a free 9 part docuмentary series starting on April 22, called "The Truth About Vaccines".

    https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/?ref=d1fc2eca-adca-4f5a-a1a8-fa48cf282b72

    The series covers the history of vaccines, including a closer look at the small pox, polio, MMR, Hep B, Influenza and other vaccines, as well as the coming covid-19 vaccine. What's in them? How effective are they? Are there other ways to achieve immunity? And much more...

    Sounds like a series definitely worth watching. Click the link above or copy it into your browser for more information and to receive reminder emails when the series is starting.
    "In His wisdom," says St. Gregory, "almighty God preferred rather to bring good out of evil than never allow evil to occur."

    Offline donkath

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1517
    • Reputation: +616/-116
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Re: The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism
    « Reply #4 on: April 24, 2020, 12:17:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • For Australians et al
       

    •  Influenza Vaccine may increase the risk of Coronavirus Infection
       

       
       1 Write Your Letter2 Review and Send
       
    • ====================================================
    • This is the email content that will be sent.
       
      YOU CAN ADD A PERSONAL MESSAGE AT THE END OF THE LETTER.
    • ====================================================
    • To [recipient]
       
       Re:  Influenza Vaccine may increase the risk of Coronavirus Infection
       I am writing to urgently express concern that you may not be up to date with the science showing that influenza vaccines can make recipients more susceptible to other respiratory viruses, including coronavirus. Several studies and medical journal articles discuss these unintended ‘non-specific’ side effects and I would like your scientific advisors to be aware of this information. I have made a list of findings from some reputable medical journals in relation to this below:

    •  1) Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated with Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
       
       https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/12/1778/455098
       
       Receiving an influenza vaccine increased fivefold the risk of acute respiratory infections (ARI’s) caused by a group of non-influenza viruses, including coronaviruses. I am extremely concerned that most Australian children are about to receive a flu shot which may make them more susceptible to suffering serious effects from Covid-19. Presently, children are considered a low risk for suffering adverse effects from Covid-19, but receiving this year's influenza vaccine may make them more susceptible.

    •  2) Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017-2018 influenza season.
       
       https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X19313647
       
       Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as virus interference. Vaccine-derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus. While this study did not conclude that influenza vaccination caused viral interference with Covid-19, this should be urgently investigated as a possible consequence of administering influenza vaccine during a Covid-19 pandemic. This study was conducted on healthy adults, US military personnel who would be at peak physical fitness and be less inclined to catch other viruses, unlike the many immune-compromised people who receive a flu shot as routine medical care. I believe the results of this study should be taken seriously and be enough to warrant using the Precautionary Principle in relation to allowing those mandated to receive an influenza vaccine to make an informed decision to refuse the flu vaccine, without discrimination. This would particularly apply to healthcare and aged care workers who are mandated to receive a flu vaccine.

    •  3) Assessment of temporally-related acute respiratory illness following influenza vaccination
       
       https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X18303153
       
       This study found that, compared with unvaccinated children, children who received the influenza vaccine had an increased risk of acute respiratory illness (ARI) caused by non-influenza pathogens (not covered by the vaccine) during the 14-day post-vaccination period. Are we soon going to have a huge outbreak of Covid-19 or other respiratory illness in the Australian population, after receiving their flu vaccines?

    •  4) Increased Risk of Non-influenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated with Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
       
       https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/
       
       Influenza vaccine recipients had a higher risk of confirmed non-influenza respiratory virus infection (RR, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.19–10.1). The majority of the non-influenza respiratory virus detections were rhinoviruses and coxsackie/echoviruses, as well as coronavirus. The increased risk among vaccine recipients was also statistically significant. It was concluded that Influenza vaccine recipients may lack temporary non-specific immunity that protected against other respiratory viruses. Again, there is a clear risk for people receiving an influenza vaccine being more susceptible to Covid-19 after receiving their flu vaccine.

    •  5) Annual Vaccination against Influenza Virus Hampers Development of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Immunity in Children
       
       https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3209321/
       
       Results from this study found that annual influenza vaccination, while effective against seasonal influenza strains found in the vaccine, prevents heterosubtypic immunity (immunity to other influenza subtypes and potentially pandemic influenza A/H5N1 viruses) through inhibiting the development of virus-specific CD8(+) T cell responses in children. The consequences of these findings have wide-ranging implications affecting the rate of viral shedding in the absence of cross-protective antibodies in the community.

    •  6) Yearly influenza vaccinations: a double-edged sword?
       
       https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(09)70263-4/fulltext
       This article summarises issues around influenza vaccine preventing heterosubtypic immunity and its implications for immunologically naive people during times of a pandemic.

    •  7) Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19
       
       https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0819-2
       
       These Melbourne-based researchers have analysed the immune response needed to fight Covid-19 and found a multi-factorial immune response (including CD8(+) T cells mentioned above) were required by a patient to recover from Covid-19. With the knowledge we now have of influenza vaccines inhibiting development of virus-specific T cell responses, administering a flu vaccine could potentially be preventing the recipient from mounting an effective response to the Covid-19 virus.

    •  8) Repeated annual influenza vaccination and vaccine effectiveness: review of evidence
       
       https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/14760584.2017.1334554
       
       Published in 2017, this international review concluded “The public health impact of repeated immunization and the immunologic mechanisms leading to reduced protection or increased risk remain poorly understood . . Our current understanding of repeated vaccination effects is inadequate to inform vaccine policy recommendations".
       If the Australian Government goes ahead with mandating influenza vaccines for any part of the population, in the knowledge that these vaccines may increase susceptibility to other diseases, the Government may be held legally liable by those harmed by these policies. Given that the Australian Government is now mandating Influenza vaccine for healthcare, childcare, aged care professionals, residents, staff and visitors and now you are informed of the conflicting science listed above, does this not make you and/or the Government guilty, morally and financially liable in the event of death, disability and injury from mandating influenza (and other) vaccines?
       If the influenza vaccine leads to further Covid-19 deaths does this not make the Government guilty of causing death?
       I would like your Department to formally respond, acknowledging receipt of this information and to answer the questions raised by this research:
       
       1) What is the Government’s response to being presented with the above evidence that influenza vaccine causes non-specific / unintended adverse effects, such as increased susceptibility to other respiratory viruses, including coronavirus?
       
       2) If the Government continues to recommend influenza vaccine in the knowledge that it causes vaccine-derived virus interference and increased risk of acute respiratory illness (ARI), what evidence does it have to continue to recommend influenza vaccination in the time of a Covid-19 pandemic, when doing so may affect the recipient’s ability to recover from Covid-19?



     •
      


    • Name* First
       Last
       
    • Email*
    • Address* Street Address
       Address Line 2
       City
       State / Province / Region
       ZIP / Postal Code
       

       Afghanistan
       Åland Islands
       Albania
       Algeria
       American Samoa
       Andorra
       Angola
       Anguilla
       Antarctica
       Antigua and Barbuda
       Argentina
       Armenia
       Aruba
       Australia
       Austria
       Azerbaijan
       Bahamas
       Bahrain
       Bangladesh
       Barbados
       Belarus
       Belgium
       Belize
       Benin
       Bermuda
       Bhutan
       Bolivia
       Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba
       Bosnia and Herzegovina
       Botswana
       Bouvet Island
       Brazil
       British Indian Ocean Territory
       Brunei Darussalam
       Bulgaria
       Burkina Faso
       Burundi
       Cambodia
       Cameroon
       Canada
       Cape Verde
       Cayman Islands
       Central African Republic
       Chad
       Chile
       China
       Christmas Island
       Cocos Islands
       Colombia
       Comoros
       Congo, Democratic Republic of the
       Congo, Republic of the
       Cook Islands
       Costa Rica
       Côte d'Ivoire
       Croatia
       Cuba
       Curaçao
       Cyprus
       Czech Republic
       Denmark
       Djibouti
       Dominica
       Dominican Republic
       Ecuador
       Egypt
       El Salvador
       Equatorial Guinea
       Eritrea
       Estonia
       Eswatini (Swaziland)
       Ethiopia
       Falkland Islands
       Faroe Islands
       Fiji
       Finland
       France
       French Guiana
       French Polynesia
       French Southern Territories
       Gabon
       Gambia
       Georgia
       Germany
       Ghana
       Gibraltar
       Greece
       Greenland
       Grenada
       Guadeloupe
       Guam
       Guatemala
       Guernsey
       Guinea
       Guinea-Bissau
       Guyana
       Haiti
       Heard and McDonald Islands
       Holy See
       Honduras
       Hong Kong
       Hungary
       Iceland
       India
       Indonesia
       Iran
       Iraq
       Ireland
       Isle of Man
       Israel
       Italy
       Jamaica
       Japan
       Jersey
       Jordan
       Kazakhstan
       Kenya
       Kiribati
       Kuwait
       Kyrgyzstan
       Lao People's Democratic Republic
       Latvia
       Lebanon
       Lesotho
       Liberia
       Libya
       Liechtenstein
       Lithuania
       Luxembourg
       Macau
       Macedonia
       Madagascar
       Malawi
       Malaysia
       Maldives
       Mali
       Malta
       Marshall Islands
       Martinique
       Mauritania
       Mauritius
       Mayotte
       Mexico
       Micronesia
       Moldova
       Monaco
       Mongolia
       Montenegro
       Montserrat
       Morocco
       Mozambique
       Myanmar
       Namibia
       Nauru
       Nepal
       Netherlands
       New Caledonia
       New Zealand
       Nicaragua
       Niger
       Nigeria
       Niue
       Norfolk Island
       North Korea
       Northern Mariana Islands
       Norway
       Oman
       Pakistan
       Palau
       Palestine, State of
       Panama
       Papua New Guinea
       Paraguay
       Peru
       Philippines
       Pitcairn
       Poland
       Portugal
       Puerto Rico
       Qatar
       Réunion
       Romania
       Russia
       Rwanda
       Saint Barthélemy
       Saint Helena
       Saint Kitts and Nevis
       Saint Lucia
       Saint Martin
       Saint Pierre and Miquelon
       Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
       Samoa
       San Marino
       Sao Tome and Principe
       Saudi Arabia
       Senegal
       Serbia
       Seychelles
       Sierra Leone
       Singapore
       Sint Maarten
       Slovakia
       Slovenia
       Solomon Islands
       Somalia
       South Africa
       South Georgia
       South Korea
       South Sudan
       Spain
       Sri Lanka
       Sudan
       Suriname
       Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
       Sweden
       Switzerland
       Syria
       Taiwan
       Tajikistan
       Tanzania
       Thailand
       Timor-Leste
       Togo
       Tokelau
       Tonga
       Trinidad and Tobago
       Tunisia
       Turkey
       Turkmenistan
       Turks and Caicos Islands
       Tuvalu
       Uganda
       Ukraine
       United Arab Emirates
       United Kingdom
       United States
       Uruguay
       US Minor Outlying Islands
       Uzbekistan
       Vanuatu
       Venezuela
       Vietnam
       Virgin Islands, British
       Virgin Islands, U.S.
       Wallis and Futuna
       Western Sahara
       Yemen
       Zambia
       Zimbabwe
       Country
       

       
    • ====================================================
    • This is the email content that will be sent.
       
      YOU CAN ADD A PERSONAL MESSAGE AT THE END OF THE LETTER.
    • ====================================================
    • To [recipient]
       https://healthiercommunities.foundation/send-a-letter/send-a-letter-influenza-vaccine-may-increase-the-risk-of-coronavirus-infection/#gf_1
    "In His wisdom," says St. Gregory, "almighty God preferred rather to bring good out of evil than never allow evil to occur."


    Offline donkath

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1517
    • Reputation: +616/-116
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Re: The Seven-Step Path from Pandemic to Totalitarianism
    « Reply #5 on: May 01, 2020, 04:35:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • ..
    A 'pandemic drone' and other technology could help limit the spread of
    coronavirus and ease restrictions sooner, but at what cost?

    A pandemic drone can be used to track temperatures, fever and social distancing.


    If you don't feel comfortable signing up to the Government's COVIDSafe tracking app, then you probably won't be happy to hear about the pandemic drone.

    Software being developed at the University of South Australia in conjunction with Canadian drone manufacturer Draganfly could see drones used to monitor the health of people, including spotting sneezes and tracking whether they have a fever.
    It is just one way technology could be used to track and slow the spread of a virus like COVID-19.
    But experts warn that new surveillance technologies must include privacy safeguards before they are adopted.


    Heart rate can be detected within 8 metres

    Javaan Chahl hopes his pandemic drone will be used to collect mass data and track patterns of behaviour.(ABC News: Lincoln Rothall)

    Professor Javaan Chahl, who holds positions with the University of South Australia and the Department of Defence, is developing software for the pandemic drone.

    The device uses thermal cameras and artificial intelligence to measure some of the indicators of coronavirus in groups of people: heart rate, body temperature, coughing and sneezing.

    "Heart rate can be measured in two different ways," he told 7.30.

    "From a drone, we normally would measure it by a subtle change in skin tone that's associated with each heartbeat. "And it's caused by changing the volume of blood in the skin. It also causes slight movement."

    The drone would also be able to detect a cough from "15-20 metres away", while heart rate can be detected within 6-8 metres with only a "very small" margin of error.

    It could also be used to monitor social distancing.

    While still six months from completion, Professor Chahl hoped it would be used to collect data on a large scale and track patterns of behaviour to paint a broad picture of the spread of COVID-19 in a city, rather than monitor individuals.

    "When you look at thousands of people, or millions of people, you'll start to see a trend," he said.

    "And I think we don't have systems in place to surveil for that, particularly. "It would be very useful to know how many people are suffering from symptoms associated with respiratory distress.

    "So, if you see a lot of people coughing and sneezing and with elevated heart rates
    and breathing rates and fever, okay, that's good to know.

    "And if that's increasing, that's very important to know."


    Concerns about 'big brother surveillance'

    Toby Walsh, an expert in artificial intelligence, has concerns about how new technology could be used.(Supplied: UNSW Grant Turner)
    Professor Chahl does acknowledge the technology could also be used to watch and target individuals if a future user wanted to.


    "All such technologies carry a risk with them," he said.
    "I might think it's a very bad idea to use drones to chase people around who might be sick. But perhaps others might have different ideas.
    "And it's very hard to restrain them from using it like that once the genie is out of the bottle."
    Police in the US city of Westport, an hour north of New York, were trialling the software along with Draganfly, but pulled out last week over privacy concerns.


    Your questions on coronavirus answered:


    "There's a lot of discussion going on at the moment about how we manage that privacy so that you don't take away people's freedom, or start imposing on them unnecessarily," Professor Chahl said.

    "But you do want to watch for the presence of this infectious disease. So there's a lot of challenges."

    Artificial intelligence expert Professor Toby Walsh urged a cautious approach towards adopting technologies like the pandemic drone.

    "I think the devil is in the detail: how it's rolled out, what safeguards are put in place," he said.

    "There's every reason that this technology could be a useful tool in our armoury with rolling back the restrictions and allowing people to go about somewhat more normal lives.

    "But, equally, there are concerns that you'd have about people's privacy and about whether when normality has returned, that we are not finding ourselves in a big brother surveillance state."


    Surveillance tech already used overseas

     Hong Kong makes arrivals to the territory wear a tracking wristband and self-isolate for 14 days.(ABC News)

    Several places in east Asia, including Hong Kong, Taiwan and South Korea, have taken a more technology-driven approach to fighting coronavirus, successfully slowing the rate of transmission without enforcing the same strict lockdowns seen in Australia and some European countries, and keeping shops and restaurants open.

    Everyone who lands in Hong Kong must download a mandatory phone app and wear a wristband for two weeks while in compulsory quarantine.
    The app and wristband work together to track the user's whereabouts, along with regular video calls from health officials.
    Professor Walsh doubts that level of surveillance would go down well in Australia.

    "These are extraordinary times, but I think those are extraordinary measures that I suspect most people in Australia would find too much down the road to taking us to what [authors] George Orwell, Huxley and other people have warned us about the surveillance state that we could be in," Professor Walsh said.

    Another distinct feature of Hong Kong's tech-driven approach to tackling the virus is the routine use of temperature checks, which are a common sight at the entrance to restaurants, offices, shopping malls and government buildings across the city.


    Fever scanning


    Rustom Kanga has developed an automated fever scanning system.(ABC News: Jerry Rickard)

    Australian entrepreneur Rustom Kanga hopes that temperature-taking technology will soon be more widespread here.

    His company iOmniscient has developed an automated fever scanning system which can operate through CCTV cameras to check the temperatures of people in crowds.

    He claimed it was accurate "to about 0.2 of a degree Celsius".

    "Now and in the future, we will be releasing the lockdown, there'll be lesser restrictions," he told 7.30.

    "And in those environments we are going to still have to keep track of everyone.

    "We are going to have to monitor people to make sure that there is no one round with a fever, because the fever is the first external indication, usually, of an infection of the coronavirus."
    Dr Kanga said the software used artificial intelligence, including facial recognition, to automatically read the body temperature of "hundreds of people" at once in a crowd and alert authorities if someone had a fever.

    The system could then track them through a network of cameras until they could be identified by a staff member or official.

    "It uses what is called a thermographic camera, which is a camera that can detect the heat of things in the environment," he said.

    "In this case, it's detecting the temperature of a person's skin."

    Dr Kanga believed the technology could be useful in places where people are still gathering in groups such as schools, pharmacies, shops, defence facilities, hospitals and prisons.

    "Today there is no real checking in public areas of whether people have fevers," he said.

    "A system like this will give them an early indication that there's someone who potentially has a fever."

    We won't be able to 'go back to our normal lives'

    Proponents say technology like automated fever scanning could help ease coronavirus restrictions sooner.(ABC News)

    The use of facial recognition technology is highly controversial and concerns have long been raised by civil liberties groups about its use in public spaces and about the potential for authorities to use it to track citizens.

    But Dr Kanga said his software "anonymised" faces by default and people would only be identified when requested by the user.
    "Everyone's face can be redacted so that nobody sees anything," he said.

    "However, if there's a person with a fever, that person's image is sent to the smartphone or the paramedic so that he can be checked out."




    Professor Walsh said technologies like this could be part of Australia's approach, but won't replace the need for social distancing.
    "It's worth pointing out those modern technologies are not going to be a panacea," he said.

    "They're not going to allow us to go back to our normal lives, we are still going to have to social distance, we are still going to have to keep ourselves isolated physically as much as possible from each other until we have a vaccine.
    "And, until that point, our lives are going to be somewhat on hold."









    Video ABC News

    ..


    "In His wisdom," says St. Gregory, "almighty God preferred rather to bring good out of evil than never allow evil to occur."