Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: The reason feminism is winning  (Read 11983 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The reason feminism is winning
« Reply #65 on: May 04, 2012, 11:23:24 PM »
In my experience, innocent girls respond to emotion.  Loose women tend to be less emotional, more sɛҳuąƖly overt in their expressions.

The reason feminism is winning
« Reply #66 on: May 05, 2012, 12:29:38 AM »
Quote from: SpiritusSanctus
Quote from: Catholic Samurai
I'm talking about spilling your guts all over the floor trying to impress her by telling her how much you like her etc., and I'm pretty sure that's what you did because that's what a lot of your posts strongly suggest.


I would think "spilling your guts all over the floor trying to impress her" would be bragging about yourself and your accomplishments, not telling her how much you like her.


Maybe it wasn't the right expression to use. I don't know.

But if you're being emotionally open, you might as well rip out your guts and hand them to her on a silver platter while you're at it, because you're humiliating yourself and killing that respect she want's to have for you. And she can't love you if she can't respect you.

Granted, yes she MIGHT respond positively to it for a short while, but later on in the long run, she's going to realize that you're a wimp that she can control and manipulate emotionally. Guess what happens next (if she's decent)? Bye, bye.


The reason feminism is winning
« Reply #67 on: May 05, 2012, 12:38:52 AM »
Quote from: Telesphorus


Quote
I'm talking about spilling your guts all over the floor trying to impress her by telling her how much you like her etc., and I'm pretty sure that's what you did because that's what a lot of your posts strongly suggest.


Well, I couldn't talk to her.  I did eventually try to communicate with her directly and express my feelings, maybe that put her off, but....

...


GAAAAAAAAAAAAH! NO BUTS!

WHAT DID I JUST SAY?

You haven't even asked this girl out to get better acquainted with her, and you're already trying to get mushy by expressing your feelings for her?!?! Boy! What were you thinking?! Take note: THIS is where you REALLY messed up!


The reason feminism is winning
« Reply #68 on: May 05, 2012, 01:16:05 AM »
Quote from: Catholic Samurai
You haven't even asked this girl out to get better acquainted with her, and you're already trying to get mushy by expressing your feelings for her?!?! Boy! What were you thinking?! Take note: THIS is where you REALLY messed up!


No, I didn't mess up expressing my feelings.  I messed up by not expressing them earlier when I was in a better position to do so.  

Quote
As I've told you, I've spoken to women who live in environments where there isn't a lot of talk allowed


I've spoken to people who live in more traditional societies where there are more constraints in the communication of men and women.  It's completely normal to react this way.  What's abnormal, if for women to turn up their noses at sincere men they have shown interest in once the man expresses his feelings.  That's a sign of a corruption in a woman  

Innocent girls aren't put off by such things.  

The reason feminism is winning
« Reply #69 on: May 05, 2012, 12:10:35 PM »
Quote from: Caraffa
Quote from: PereJoseph
By the way, where are you getting your terminology ?  "White-knighting," "flake," "hypergamy" ... ?


I don’t agree with Tele on hypergamy due to its link with evolutionary psychology, though I do think that the concept exists to some extent; call it a form of liberal bourgeois female vanity.


Sure, I agree with that.

Quote
White knighting on the other hand is the tendency to see women as incapable of doing wrong. If a woman does something wrong it is always entirely the man’s fault. An example of white knighting is to condemn black men for high levels of black illegitimacy, but then not condemn black women as well for their sinful choices.


Yes, I am familiar with the concept and I agree that it is wrong.  That being said, I am wondering where Tele is getting his terminology, because I have been linked to the websites of certain subcultures of men before where they use almost all the same terminology as a type of jargon.  As an aside, Tele seems to use it as a crutch when he has run out of things to say to discredit anybody who disagrees with him.

Quote
It cuts both ways. So few women have the qualities of their ancestors that men find attractive.


Of course, but that goes without saying.

Quote from: Zenith
But that’s part of the problem. Why do we tolerate such behavior in some circles to begin with? We are not disordered Jacobins.


Good question.  I suppose a single layman cannot do much about a problem with another man's daughter or wife.  It's not his fight.  Ultimately, political and ecclesiastical order need to be restored; then evil customs will be uprooted by a just authority and all men will be held to account for their neglects.