There are said to be two kinds of Jєωs, the Sephardic Jєωs who are the descendants of the Jєωs of the Old Testament, and the αѕнкenαzι Jєωs, who are the Khazars that "converted," a barbarian tribe.
I'd say this is true. The Sephardic Jєωs tend to have darker skin and look Middle Eastern. Clearly, in modern-day Israel, these are mostly Sephardic Jєωs.
The αѕнкenαzι Jєωs are not of the same breed. They look like Eastern European gypsies. Their foreheads tend to be flat and high like those of Klingons, and they have very distinctive eyes, beady, droopy, smoky, hooded eyes. Nicolas Sarkozy is a prime example, or Ben Mankiewicz, the Jєωιѕн host of Turner Classic Movies. Barbara Streisand, Steven Spielberg, etc. There are many others. These are the Hollywood Jєωs.
These are the kinds of Jєω who, arriving in London in great numbers at the time, supposedly inspired Bram Stoker to write Dracula ( yes, Dracula is a Jєω metaphor ).
However, beware of the idea, apparently pushed by the Jєω Arthur Koestler, that the Sephardic Jєωs are the "good Jєωs" and the αѕнкenαzιs are the "bad Jєωs." Both are apostate until they convert, obviously. I know converts from both camps, or at least, I know one who is dark-skinned and middle Eastern ( my godmother, in fact ) and another who is more of a classic Noo Yawk αѕнкenαzι Jєω.
Perhaps, though, when the conversion of the Jєωs occurs as predicted in the Apocalypse, it will be primarly the Sephardic Jєωs. Caminus' quote about the Jєωs who aren't really Jєωs is fascinating, I always forget about that, and then it stuns me when someone mentions it.