Author Topic: The Modern Jєωs (Read 5434 times)

Canuk the Lionheart · « **on:** June 11, 2011, 10:02:28 PM »

This is something I've been wondering for a while, and a recent conversation on the matter has given me cause to look a little deeper into it. On both this and other forums I've seen plenty of threads on the Jєωs. I have read that they as a whole are responsible for Deicide, and in the same thread that they have little connection (religious, ethnic or cultural) to the Israelites or the population of Judea at the time of Christ (including the mob that condemned Jesus).

So my question is, in your opinions what is the connection of modern Jєωs to the Israelites, the population of Judea at the time of Christ, or the lack thereof?

Caminus · « **Reply #1 on:** June 11, 2011, 10:25:25 PM »

That is an excellent question and one that I have wondered myself. I think the answer is that the man who still claims to be a Jєω, is not one in fact, but in intention, thereby incurring the charge of deicide, the ultimate penalty was that they would no longer truly form a nation or a people chosen and protected by God. Thus, dispersed for 2,000 years, the Hebrew has vanished only to be replaced by ignorant imposters. There are Old Testament prophecies that attest to this extinction of carnal Israel together with prophecies indicating a national, public repudiation of the Messiah, obviously the many individual conversions notwithstanding. So while I would contend that there are no more Jєωs strictly speaking, there are those who are so by inention and referred to as such by human convention. Our Lord's words to St. John in the Apocalypse seem to imply the above distinction: "I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jєωs and are not, but are the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan." (2:9); "Behold, I will bring of the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, who say they are Jєωs, and are not, but do lie. Behold, I will make them to come and adore before thy feet." (3:9)

I do not think it can be otherwise for if one were to posit a diachronic identity, one would thereby posit that God has miraculously preserved this people, a mark and sign of credibility that can only be reserved for His true Israel, the Catholic Church (See Vatican I Council). In fact, the nouvelle theologians have seized upon this idea of being preserved as a people by God for an even longer duration than the Catholic Church and reinterpreted it in a positive light.

Darcy · « **Reply #2 on:** June 11, 2011, 10:41:21 PM »

Modern Jєωs are reputed to have originated here:

Quote

Khazaria had an ongoing entente with Byzantium. Serving their partner in wars against the Arabian Caliphate, Khazaria aided the Byzantine emperor Heraclius (reigned 610–641) by sending an army of 40,000 soldiers in his campaign against the Persians.[8] In 775, Leo IV was crowned as the sole emperor of the Byzantine Empire.

After fighting the Arabs to a standstill in the North Caucasus, Khazars became increasingly interested in replacing their Tengri shamanism with a state religion that would give them equal religious standing with their Abrahamic neighbors.

According to the Khazar Correspondence, Khagan Bulan summoned three clerics representing the three religions and had them dispute their creeds before him. But, no cleric could convince the others, or the sovereign, that his religion was the best. So the ruler spoke to each of them separately. He asked the Christian priest: "If you had to give up Christianity, which one would you prefer - Islam or Judaism?" The priest said: "If I were to give up Christianity, I would become a Jєω." Bulan then asked the follower of Islam the same question, "Christianity or Judaism?" and the Moslem also chose Judaism. This is how Bulan came to choose Judaism for himself and the people of Khazaria in the seventh century A.D., and thereafter the Khazars lived according to Judaic laws.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars

Here is a pro/con site on Khazarian Jєωs

http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-diaspora.html

Darcy · « **Reply #3 on:** June 11, 2011, 10:55:21 PM »

Modern Jєωs do not practice the Oral Traditions of Moses which is the religion of Judaism at the time of Christ. They have a huge book of Rabbinical arguments called the тαℓмυd and their beliefs also come from there.

In the тαℓмυd some terrible things about Jesus are said. (and about Gentiles or "Goyim"---the cattle, that's us)

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire1.html

I am sure that most regular Jєωs do not take these docuмents of their faith seriously.

Darcy · « **Reply #4 on:** June 11, 2011, 11:00:33 PM »

Quote

The тαℓмυd Unmasked

The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians

By
Rev. I. B. Pranaitis

Roman Catholic Priest; Master of Theology and Professor
of the Hebrew Language at the Imperial Ecclesiastical
Academy of the Roman Catholic Church
in Old St. Petersburg.

St. Petersburg
Printing office of the
Imperial Academy of Sciences
1892

IMPRIMATUR
St. Petersburg,
April 13, 1892
KOZLOWSKY
Archbishop Metropolitan of Moghileff

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/тαℓмυd1.htm

Not a Catholic website but the page appears to be a booklet written by Fr. Pranaitis

Raoul76 · « **Reply #5 on:** June 12, 2011, 03:00:38 AM »

There are said to be two kinds of Jєωs, the Sephardic Jєωs who are the descendants of the Jєωs of the Old Testament, and the αѕнкenαzι Jєωs, who are the Khazars that "converted," a barbarian tribe.

I'd say this is true. The Sephardic Jєωs tend to have darker skin and look Middle Eastern. Clearly, in modern-day Israel, these are mostly Sephardic Jєωs.

The αѕнкenαzι Jєωs are not of the same breed. They look like Eastern European gypsies. Their foreheads tend to be flat and high like those of Klingons, and they have very distinctive eyes, beady, droopy, smoky, hooded eyes. Nicolas Sarkozy is a prime example, or Ben Mankiewicz, the Jєωιѕн host of Turner Classic Movies. Barbara Streisand, Steven Spielberg, etc. There are many others. These are the Hollywood Jєωs.

These are the kinds of Jєω who, arriving in London in great numbers at the time, supposedly inspired Bram Stoker to write Dracula ( yes, Dracula is a Jєω metaphor ).

However, beware of the idea, apparently pushed by the Jєω Arthur Koestler, that the Sephardic Jєωs are the "good Jєωs" and the αѕнкenαzιs are the "bad Jєωs." Both are apostate until they convert, obviously. I know converts from both camps, or at least, I know one who is dark-skinned and middle Eastern ( my godmother, in fact ) and another who is more of a classic Noo Yawk αѕнкenαzι Jєω.

Perhaps, though, when the conversion of the Jєωs occurs as predicted in the Apocalypse, it will be primarly the Sephardic Jєωs. Caminus' quote about the Jєωs who aren't really Jєωs is fascinating, I always forget about that, and then it stuns me when someone mentions it.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #6 on:** June 12, 2011, 06:51:03 AM »

Not to be too racist, but this one is hilarious:

Karl Radek and Ruth Bader Ginsburg have a baby:

Telesphorus · « **Reply #7 on:** June 12, 2011, 07:18:44 AM »

Quote from: Raoul76

Nicolas Sarkozy is a prime example, or Ben Mankiewicz, the Jєωιѕн host of Turner Classic Movies. Barbara Streisand, Steven Spielberg, etc. There are many others. These are the Hollywood Jєωs.

Raoul the appearance that Sarkozy has, the shape of the smile and the nose comes from Mesopotamia.

I know an Arab/Iranian woman born in Baghdad, a lovely woman, she has
a similar sort of smile and the long nose.

Sarkozy is in fact related to Sephardic Jєωs from Salonika, originally from Spain.

I believe genetic testing has largely disproved Koestler's Khazar thesis.

In comparing the Sephardics and the αѕнкenαzιs in terms of appearance, the αѕнкenαzιs tend to be more rounded, to be more squat, whereas the Sephardics have the longer more arabid looks. Although someone like John Kerry has some αѕнкenαzι yet he has the very elongated features.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #8 on:** June 12, 2011, 07:49:19 AM »

A nice site:

http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/pantocrator.htm

I believe the Antichrist will probably resemble Christ in physical appearance.

David de Rothschild:

He's going to be 33 this year if he isn't already.

herbert · « **Reply #9 on:** June 12, 2011, 08:55:38 AM »

will the antichrist be 33 when he makehis appearance?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #10 on:** June 12, 2011, 08:58:05 AM »

Quote from: herbert

will the antichrist be 33 when he makehis appearance?

I have no idea. I was just pointing out the resemblance of this Rothschild character (he has books in the children section of the library with a polar bear on the cover about global warming) to the iconography of Christ.

Darcy · « **Reply #11 on:** June 12, 2011, 10:51:58 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

A nice site:

http://www.shroudofturin4journalists.com/pantocrator.htm

I believe the Antichrist will probably resemble Christ in physical appearance.

David de Rothschild:

He's going to be 33 this year if he isn't already.

He looks Anglo to me.
Or maybe Scottish.
?

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #12 on:** June 12, 2011, 05:45:43 PM »

Quote from: herbert

will the antichrist be 33 when he makehis appearance?

I would imagine so, although I don't think anyone has ever said for sure. All we know about the antichrist is that he will be a Jєω born in the middle-east that will appear in the Holy Lands and will claim to be a prophet of Christ, perhaps even claiming to be Christ Himself. The antichrist will be possessed by the devil and will perform a "miracle" to get people to believe him. Those who are wise, however, will be able to see right through his lies.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #13 on:** June 12, 2011, 06:45:29 PM »

Telesphorus said:

Quote

Raoul the appearance that Sarkozy has, the shape of the smile and the nose comes from Mesopotamia.

I know an Arab/Iranian woman born in Baghdad, a lovely woman, she has
a similar sort of smile and the long nose.

Sarkozy is in fact related to Sephardic Jєωs from Salonika, originally from Spain.

I don't think so, Tele. When he exiled the gypsies it was mentioned, or I remember reading, that he had Eastern European gypsy Jєω blood himself. To refresh my memory, I did some research and found this on a blog:

Quote

Periodically, EU politicians trying to win popular support or in trouble with the public try to use the gypsies as scapegoats, as did Silvio Berlusconi in spring 2008 and now Nicolas Sarkozy. It has been many years since I was in France, but the last time I was there the socio-cultural ambiance romanticized in my mind appeared friendlier and more cosmopolitan than any other western country I have ever visited. That Sarkozy, who traces his lineage to Eastern and South-Eastern European Jєωs, has decided to exile Roma from France is reminiscent of the nαzι persecution after 1935, leading to the “gypsy h0Ɩ0cαųst.”"

I have never heard that he's Sephardic. If you can get some proof, that's one thing, but saying he looks like an Iranian woman you know is not exactly compelling evidence. Just having a big nose doesn't make someone Sephardic; Poles also have big noses, and Basques, isn't it nice that I'm part Basque and half-Pole?

I question your judgment on this one because that guy is the ultimate Khazar. He's Hungarian, gypsy and Jєωιѕн. That is the hat trick, precisely what Dracula is based on. Even if there is no such thing as a Khazar Jєω, which I grant is possible, he looks like the popular conception of a Khazar Jєω.

Raoul76 · « **Reply #14 on:** June 12, 2011, 06:47:00 PM »

That Rothschild dude really does look like Jesus. Uncanny. It's like he stepped right off the Shroud of Turin.

Then again, Jesus was Jєωιѕн, so... There are light-skinned Jєωs who look Anglo. Paul Newman, for example.