The Jєωιѕн hand in Irish affairs. When Catholic and Christian power goes down, Jєωιѕн influence goes up.We have given them the power.

 A short video uploaded to YouTube.

 :confused1:That is so. Liberal Catholics are responsible for what is going on in the world today. They embrace and love everybody...and believe they are all going to the same Heaven. hmmmmmmmmmm

I always thought that book "Trinity" by Leon Uris (a Jєω) was very subversive. Really painted the Catholic Church in a horrible light while it glorified the Irish people as a race or nation. That book  is on all of my relatives bookshelf.  In fact, when I read it I thought it was just wonderful. And he was so clever, calling the the book
"Trinity" as if it was alluding to the the Blessed Trinity. As I said, very subversive, and there was no condemnation of it, although my aunts said they hated it, I couldn't understand until now. There has been a lot of propaganda in Ireland, a lot of those nationalist rebel songs weren't written by Irish at all but by Fabian socialists. Notice those rebel songs never include any reference to Catholicism, it's always "Irishmen" and "for Ireland we fight and die". Except "The Mass Rock in the Glenn" of course, that song needs to re-emerge.


The Tragedy of James Connelly by Father Denis Fahey is a good book that explores this subject more deeply.

Show me how it "enables" the activity?

I think you've been pretty good on the Jєωιѕн question, but in general it's a way of stifling criticism, and the fact that there are taboos about talking about Jєωs allows them to act with relative impunity.  

If it wasn't for the liberalism that has infected the Irish  and practiced tolerance to begin with, they wouldn't have a problem with "Jєωιѕн influence" within their culture at all, they would be a nonfactor.

And that's irrelevant to the threat posed by Jєωιѕн influence, or to criticism of it.  It's like saying "if our first parents hadn't sinned, we wouldn't be under the control of the devil." when someone warns about the devil.  

Noncooperation with the Jєωιѕн agenda means no influence at all, problem solved.

And how do you expect people to stop cooperating with them if they aren't talked about?  Like I said, I wasn't really responding to you in particular, just this idea that we can't blame Jєωs for evil they do because it depends on gentile cooperation.  That's a fallacy.

But many Irish sold out, like everywhere else, they sell out.

Everyone seems to have their price.

Yes, it does seem that way sometimes.  

The ethics of the тαℓмυd seem to suggest to me that if a Jєω tricks a gentile it's the gentile's fault for being tricked.  

I don't think we should accept that sort of thinking.

I always thought that book "Trinity" by Leon Uris (a Jєω) was very subversive. Really painted the Catholic Church in a horrible light while it glorified the Irish people as a race or nation. That book  is on all of my relatives bookshelf.  In fact, when I read it I thought it was just wonderful. And he was so clever, calling the the book
"Trinity" as if it was alluding to the the Blessed Trinity. As I said, very subversive, and there was no condemnation of it, although my aunts said they hated it, I couldn't understand until now. There has been a lot of propaganda in Ireland, a lot of those nationalist rebel songs weren't written by Irish at all but by Fabian socialists. Notice those rebel songs never include any reference to Catholicism, it's always "Irishmen" and "for Ireland we fight and die". Except "The Mass Rock in the Glenn" of course, that song needs to re-emerge.


The Tragedy of James Connelly by Father Denis Fahey is a good book that explores this subject more deeply.

Yeah a lot of Irish have imbibed this false identity.

I'll have to read the Fahey book. I've liked his other ones.

In America you have to ask the question, who let Jєωs in and why?  It seems to me it was the same people who decided to let Southern and Eastern European Catholics into America.  In other words, American Elites with mostly Northern and Western European Protestant Ancestry must have decided, religion and "race" didn't matter anymore.  

Jєωs have always been here, but one way to look at is that the masonic elite of htis country (in which there were some Jєωs and over which Jєωs, because of their international power, had considerable influence) intended to divide and rule, and also to gain as much economic strength as possible in anticipation of America becoming the world's foremost power.  So they wanted as many bodies here as possible.

I've never really heard that before.  

There were certainly those in England who wanted the US divided and encouraged the cινιℓ ωαr for that reason.

Oh yes, Jєωs have been here from early on.  The Grandmaster of Paul Revere's Lodge, Moses Michael Hayes, was a Jєω.

What happened at around the turn of the 20th Century, the Russian Jєωs came here en masse and gradually became very prominent, but they were always here, there influence was always here.

http://www.dcpages.com/gallery/House-of-the-Temple/DSC04797.jpg.html?g2_GALLERYSID=TMP_SESSION_ID_DI_NOISSES_PMT

There was a Protestant minister in Cincinnati named Woolfolk, he published a book about the Jєωιѕн money power and its expansion in the US in the 19th Century.

It's called "The London Money Power: Or The Great Red Dragon"

Hate to sound like a broken record, but the Jєωs were let in by Masons at every turn. No other group would favor them so completely and utterly.

My impression of The Masons is that they believe in what I think is called,  "Syncretism" (the belief that all paths can/do lead to God).  I always think of that song by The Police, "Syncronicity I," not so much "Syncronicity II."  Even though it's supposed to be based on the jungian concept, that concept seems like it would be drawn from a culture of "syncretism" or what I understand Masonry to be like.