Show me how it "enables" the activity?
I think you've been pretty good on the Jewish question, but in general it's a way of stifling criticism, and the fact that there are taboos about talking about Jews allows them to act with relative impunity.
If it wasn't for the liberalism that has infected the Irish and practiced tolerance to begin with, they wouldn't have a problem with "Jewish influence" within their culture at all, they would be a nonfactor.
And that's irrelevant to the threat posed by Jewish influence, or to criticism of it. It's like saying "if our first parents hadn't sinned, we wouldn't be under the control of the devil." when someone warns about the devil.
Noncooperation with the Jewish agenda means no influence at all, problem solved.
And how do you expect people to stop cooperating with them if they aren't talked about? Like I said, I wasn't really responding to you in particular, just this idea that we can't blame Jews for evil they do because it depends on gentile cooperation. That's a fallacy.
But many Irish sold out, like everywhere else, they sell out.
Everyone seems to have their price.
Yes, it does seem that way sometimes.
The ethics of the Talmud seem to suggest to me that if a Jew tricks a gentile it's the gentile's fault for being tricked.
I don't think we should accept that sort of thinking.