This is nothing that Christ Himself didn't say: "You are the children of the devil and the desires of your father you will do."
Anyone who doesn't serve God, serves the devil. You don't need to say "We worship Lucifer." Simply by not allowing your will and your mind to conform to God's, by resisting his grace, you will become demonically possessed. This isn't true just of Jєωs but of all men. I used to listen to a lot of rock music before my baptism, not necessarily a field dominated by Jєωs, and these people are absolutely possessed. It doesn't matter if the rock star comes from Sweden, Japan, America or India, they all use a similar range of metaphors, they all have the same muse, who is the devil or at least a lesser demon. I don't think anyone really listens to what these obscure and intriguing, almost hieroglyphic rock lyrics of modern times are really saying. You don't need to listen to Led Zeppelin backwards to hear the word "Satan." The words played forwards are insidious enough, and are full of the strangely alluring yet deceptive wisdom of Satan.
It is not all about the Jєωs, though I used to think it was. Unconverted Jєωs, however -- I say "unconverted" because there is a converted Jєωιѕн woman in my sede church group that is a saint -- can be described as being the prime movers behind the modern rebellion against God. I describe them as being the cells of Satan's body. You know how in heaven every saint is said to be a ray of light? The "saints" of hell are each a shaft of darkness. Most people on their way to hell are passive victims; but many, like the Jєωs, are the active deceivers, who perhaps think that because of this they are closer to Satan, the way Catholic saints are closer to God than more lukewarm believers. They may be right; unfortunately, closer to Satan is not a good place to be. He is not a creature renowned for loyalty.
Some will say, "How can all Jєωs be evil, not all of them are media moguls, I know one who drives a zamboni!" To which I reply, "The one who drives the zamboni is there to make you think that not all of them are rich or control society." It is simply window-dressing. When you are putting on a play, you don't only cast the stars, but also the extras, to give the entire production life. But the one who drives the zamboni knows what his fellows are doing and approves of it. This all goes back to their communistic mind-set, to their absorption into what is known as the "hive mind." They are not individuals but have an uncanny radar, attuned to each other and to their queen bee, Satan, so that they each know their place in the work of destruction, sometimes more exalted, sometimes more humble, the way that Catholics also know their place in the hierarchy of God, some being monks, some being priests, some being bishops, some being laymen.
The problem is that Jєωs, having total control of the minds of most people through the media, have turned them into mockers of God, just like themselves. People of my generation, if they have to talk about Jesus at all, will say "Jeebus" or "Baby Jesus" or "Sexy Jesus," irreverent catch-phrases from Jєωιѕн movies. If you talk to them with sincerity about Jesus they think you are insane. As for kneeling in front of the cross or being a devout Catholic or attacking the lies of the modern world, forget about it. They'll say "How can such people exist in the 21st century?" Or my favorite, "It's 2009," as if that has some intrinsic meaning. Living in 2009 apparently means accepting any blasphemy and outrage and liking it, or else we will grow "old alone."
I have a fascination with studying Jєωιѕн artists and thinkers that maybe I shouldn't have. But always there is this obsession with destruction. Steven Spielberg, for instance, invented a video game called "Boom Blox" which is all about this orgy of anthropomorphic blocks blowing up other blocks in various eras of history. It is so deranged that I don't even think I can describe it.
And as I was waiting for take-out food the other day, I read an article about an Israeli artist who paints still-lifes of things blowing up. You know how Rembrandt might paint a piece of fruit? Well, this guy blows up a piece of fruit, photographs it in the act of evisceration, and THEN paints it. "There is something beautiful in destruction," he says and then spouts some kind of Hindu philosophy about "destruction and creation" and the "cycles of life." To add insult and injury he lies about history and repeats the old canard that the nαzιs, famous for their love of architecture, of Wagner and Bruckner, started their war out of some kind of aesthetic impulse to create the new Germany. In reality Hitler was a Jєωιѕн agent and the war was stirred up to scare the Jєωs out of Europe, and to give them an excuse to land-grab Israel, denied to them as their natural right by Pius X among others.
-- Michael de la Sota