Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: THE EARTHMOVERS  (Read 119323 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

THE EARTHMOVERS
« Reply #555 on: December 26, 2014, 12:42:17 PM »
Quote from: Cantarella
These are fascinating reads, Casini. Thanks for posting.

You are very welcome Cantarella. The whole synthesis is undergoing a final edit and may eventually be published. As you know, the Galileo affair is a never ending subject and a year hardly goes by without another pro-Copernican author publishing something else about the affair. But more and more information becomes available as time goes by and of course we now have the internet research engine. For example, I recently got a book on Fr Athanasius Kircher Jesuit, (1602-1680) the polymath.by Joscelyn Godwin. This genius, who investigated all origins, was a tychonian geocentrist. Yet not one word about him is to be found in the Galileo affaqir. Indeed I googled in to see what they say about him and two authors suggested he was a silent-Copernican, too afraid to tell anyone at the time. You see how history is re-written by the Copernicans, both inside the Church and outside of it.

God bless and happy new year. If any have any questions just ask.

THE EARTHMOVERS
« Reply #556 on: January 02, 2015, 08:18:55 AM »
 :cheers:


THE EARTHMOVERS
« Reply #557 on: October 11, 2015, 09:19:25 PM »
Quote from: cassini
1945: Vita e Opere di Galileo Galilei

Two years later, in 1945, Fr Paschini finished his book Vita e Opere di Galileo Galilei. Pio Paschini was a seminary professor of the highest integrity, well used to researching docuмents in the various Vatican libraries. Working through the war years 1942 to 1944 he completed his thesis and submitted his book to the Vatican authorities for their attention prior to its publication. The first hurdle to achieving this was the Vatican Secretariat of State where Deputy Secretary Giovanni Battista Montini (the future Pope Paul VI) was in favour of publication. He in turn however had to put the matter in the hands of the Holy Office which would make the final decision whether the book could be published or not. Pope Pius XII, who it seems was also in favour of publication at first, sought the collective opinion of the Holy Office. The assessor of the time was Monsignor Alfredo Ottaviani (1890-1979), and it was he who decided the book was ‘unsuitable for publication.’ In 1979, a group of Italian scholars researching the history of this book in Paschini’s extensive correspondence on the matter, uncovered the reason why Rome censored the thesis. It turned out that while all agreed the book was factual, it was not considered ‘politically correct’ as far as the now Copernican Rome was concerned. Paschini it seems; simply wrote down the Galileo case as it happened. The problem then was that once churchmen accepted Galileo was proven correct in faith and science, the Church just could not come out of recorded history in any way other than ‘guilty as charged.’ The last thing Rome wanted then was a book confirming and reminding a Copernican world of exactly what occurred in 1616 and the Church’s condemnation of Galileo in 1633. Paschini was asked to tone down certain aspects of his book. He was willing to do so in certain unimportant places but not with regard to its details as he read them from the archives. A year later, in 1946, the Holy Office told him his book was not going to be published and offered him money as compensation. Paschini was rightly devastated. He immediately shelved his book and returned to his career as before. Fr Pio Paschini died in 1962 never having edited his book.
From here:
Quote from: Geremia
Quote from: cassini
Fr Pio Paschini (1878-1962), president of the Lateran University at the time.
Finocchiaro's book, Retrying Galileo: 1633-1992 (pp. 318-319), says Pope St. Pius X
Quote from: Galileo scholar Maurice Finocchiaro
personally chose Paschini [for the Roman Seminary], whom he admired for his integrity, scholarship, teaching ability, and orthodoxy; with regard to the latter, by that time Paschini had been able to convince his superiors that he was no modernist.
This "Paschini Affair" reminds me of this quote from Fr. Stanley Jaki, “The Physicist and the Metaphysician,” 195 fn. 33. (my translation of the Italian):
Quote
the “letters” of the most Rev. Fr. Garrigou-Lagrange...constitute a special archive which is still under the pontifical care and secret, since the correspondence of Fr. Garrigou-Lagrange treats and involves a very important and decisive period of the modern Church and, in particular, of the Holy See. Thus, some time will have to pass before this “material” can be placed at the disposition of scholars.
See the paper "The Two Uses of Reason" for a translation of Fr. G.-L.'s now-"declassified" letters.

Offline Meg

Re: THE EARTHMOVERS
« Reply #558 on: January 19, 2018, 04:55:44 PM »
THE EARTHMOVERS: The cult of the sun as master of ‘planet-earth’ originated in the main from the occult convictions of the post Noachian-flood Egyptians (2,941BC). It arises within the religion of Phallicism, the bond that unites all forms of idolatry into one great system. It stems directly from sun worship, heliolatry or light worship, e.g., Mithraism. It is evident that the learned of the heliolaters viewed the sun as the life source to all terrestrial creatures, the cause of all life and therefore divine.

Accordingly, this paganism literally strove to regulate all places (a heliocentric order,) politics and religion in the image of their sun-deity. This priest-led cult included alchemy and magic, that is, a gnosis, an esoteric knowledge, a mode of indoctrination designed to overcome man’s fallen state and restore knowledge of all things enjoyed by Adam before the fall so that we can become like gods.

A little later, under the auspices of astronomy and astrology, the heliocentric belief surfaced again. In the 6th century BC, the Egyptian-trained Pythagoras reintroduced the sun-centred world and followers such as Philolaus, the teacher of Plato, and Plato himself, according to Aristotle, accepted a solar system. After him, in the 4th century BC, it was Heracleides who promoted the idea that the earth moves around a central fire. A century later, Aristarchus of Samos (240BC) also advocated a heliocentric world. He was accused of impiety so gained few converts.

Throughout all the centuries after Christ, the reality of the senses remained and geocentrism prevailed. Nevertheless, the pagan cult of a sun-centred world with its ‘illuminated priests’ never died; the seeds of the belief system, this gnosis, having been inserted into the occult writings of men, now best known as the Hermetic, Gnostic and cabbalistic texts. Thus, in the second century AD, there came into existence a ‘Holy Grail,’ protected over the centuries by many organisations and secret societies, for they knew there would come a time and generations more favourable to their cause. And so it was that with the re-emergence of the Hermetic books in the fifteenth century in Florence, the heliocentric doctrine began to attract and fascinate new recruits. This magic then spread like wildfire, becoming an integral part of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.


I found this old thread that discusses the effect of hermeticism and occultism on new scientific thought. I hadn't realized before that hermeticism in particular has had an influence such as this. Though the author of the thread is a supporter of geocentrism, rather than the flat earth, there might be some good info here.

Re: THE EARTHMOVERS
« Reply #559 on: January 27, 2018, 03:09:02 PM »
Bravo! Thank you! :applause: