Author Topic: THE EARTHMOVERS (Read 123128 times)

glaston · « **Reply #535 on:** November 22, 2014, 07:22:06 PM »

https://www.google.co.uk/#q=Karol+Wojty%C5%82a+mother+was+Jєωιѕн

When does your book come out?

cassini · « **Reply #536 on:** November 23, 2014, 08:40:12 AM »

Quote from: glaston

https://www.google.co.uk/#q=Karol+Wojty%C5%82a+mother+was+Jєωιѕн

When does your book come out?

The book is now under its final review and the author is hoping it will be published next year. It was his hobby for 20 years, and with a few friends they kept adding and adding to what was at first to be a book about Galileo. He was told very few would want to read such a book and even less would believe what is in it. It was only when Catholic forums came on stream that they found there are others out there who were biblical and scientific geocentrists. Of interest is why he really wanted to write it:

'Now why was this book written? In the main it was written to retell the story of the Galileo case in the light of all we know today. It was written to vindicate and restore the good name of the Catholic Church and the churchmen of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries who upheld the geocentric interpretation of Scripture. In doing so we realise there is probably something herein to offend, disturb or appal many people – especially post Vatican II Catholics - so we can think of only a few that might welcome it. Nevertheless, for those who still have a love for truth and knowledge let us give the facts, the truth, as others tried before and continue to try, and demonstrate their truth, and the reader can take it or leave it.'

glaston · « **Reply #537 on:** November 23, 2014, 09:05:55 AM »

Quote from: cassini

Quote from: glaston
https://www.google.co.uk/#q=Karol+Wojty%C5%82a+mother+was+Jєωιѕн

When does your book come out?

The book is now under its final review and the author is hoping it will be published next year. It was his hobby for 20 years, and with a few friends they kept adding and adding to what was at first to be a book about Galileo. He was told very few would want to read such a book and even less would believe what is in it. It was only when Catholic forums came on stream that they found there are others out there who were biblical and scientific geocentrists. Of interest is why he really wanted to write it:

'Now why was this book written? In the main it was written to retell the story of the Galileo case in the light of all we know today. It was written to vindicate and restore the good name of the Catholic Church and the churchmen of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries who upheld the geocentric interpretation of Scripture. In doing so we realise there is probably something herein to offend, disturb or appal many people – especially post Vatican II Catholics - so we can think of only a few that might welcome it. Nevertheless, for those who still have a love for truth and knowledge let us give the facts, the truth, as others tried before and continue to try, and demonstrate their truth, and the reader can take it or leave it.'

Thanks Cassini - honourable Hobby

It's called "Darwin's Theory" - The clue is in the title!

We are brainwashed/programmed into thinking "The Theory" is Truth
I don't really give it a second thought.

cassini · « **Reply #538 on:** November 23, 2014, 09:58:23 AM »

Quote from: glaston

Quote from: cassini
Quote from: glaston
https://www.google.co.uk/#q=Karol+Wojty%C5%82a+mother+was+Jєωιѕн

When does your book come out?

The book is now under its final review and the author is hoping it will be published next year. It was his hobby for 20 years, and with a few friends they kept adding and adding to what was at first to be a book about Galileo. He was told very few would want to read such a book and even less would believe what is in it. It was only when Catholic forums came on stream that they found there are others out there who were biblical and scientific geocentrists. Of interest is why he really wanted to write it:

'Now why was this book written? In the main it was written to retell the story of the Galileo case in the light of all we know today. It was written to vindicate and restore the good name of the Catholic Church and the churchmen of the seventeenth, eighteenth and nineteenth centuries who upheld the geocentric interpretation of Scripture. In doing so we realise there is probably something herein to offend, disturb or appal many people – especially post Vatican II Catholics - so we can think of only a few that might welcome it. Nevertheless, for those who still have a love for truth and knowledge let us give the facts, the truth, as others tried before and continue to try, and demonstrate their truth, and the reader can take it or leave it.'

Thanks Cassini - honourable Hobby

It's called "Darwin's Theory" - The clue is in the title!

We are brainwashed/programmed into thinking "The Theory" is Truth
I don't really give it a second thought.

Yes Glaston, its like

Why do they call it the 'MISSING LINK?'

Answer: Because it is missing. If it was a true link it would be called a 'FOUND LINK.'

cassini · « **Reply #539 on:** November 27, 2014, 02:12:52 PM »

SPACE FLIGHT

‘But what about space flight’, we hear some ask. ‘These days, don’t the newspapers and journals show us diagrams of rockets blasting off from an earth rotating and orbiting the sun? How could they get probes, crafts and even men to land on the planets unless they know for certain where the earth is supposed to be at any time in its orbit relative to the other planets also in orbit? Surely all those astrophysicists and rocket-science whiz kids that fill the computer halls of NASA’s launch site have to keep ongoing calculations of this heliocentric circus of shifting bodies supposedly moving at 67,000mph, more than the speed of a bullet? And when aimed at a planet, then the planet too will have shifted some thousands of miles in one second. Now do not tell me, you say, they can do this if they do not KNOW the earth really spins and orbits the sun?’
The answer of course is that this concept too is fiction, as a letter to the New Scientist magazine of Aug. 16, 1979 confirmed:

Royal Air Force College, Cranwell, Linclonshire, England.
‘Sir, ...One can of course believe anything one likes as long as the consequences of the belief are trivial. But when survival depends on that belief, then it matters that belief corresponds to manifest reality. We therefore teach navigators that the stars are fixed to the Celestial sphere, which is centred on a fixed earth, and around which it rotates in accordance with laws clearly deducible from common-sense observation. The sun and moon move across the inner surface of this sphere, and hence perforce go around the earth. This means that students of navigation must unlearn a lot of confused dogma they learned in school. Most of them find this remarkably easy, because dogma is as may be, but the real world is as we perceive it to be. If Andrew Hill will look in the Journal of Navigation he will find that the Earth-centred Universe is alive and well, whatever his readings of the Spectator may suggest.' --- Yours, Darcy Reddyhoff.’

Martin Gwynne completes our education:

‘Not the least interesting thing in the passage just quoted is the officer’s use of the term “confused dogma” when speaking of modern astronomy. For the sake of completeness I shall now fill in any gaps he left that might interest readers by giving the following summary of the principles of celestial navigation. (1) Celestial navigation is based on the premise of two concentric spheres – one (celestial) larger than the other – sharing a common pole, with the smaller and inner sphere remaining stationary while the outer revolves about it. (2) Calculations are based on the laws of spherical trigonometry. The measurements used to translate the computations into a position or “fix” on the earth are done in nautical miles (even in these days of almost universal metrication). Each of these 360 degrees of the circle is divided into 60 minutes. The nautical mile is defined as the length of one minute of longitude on the equator, or 6,080 feet. (3) The tables used to reduce or compute the resultant observations are based on 360 degrees. (4) All the navigators of the world use the same basic system, their calculations and charts being based on a fixed earth and the basic unit of the nautical mile.’ ---N. M. Gwynne, Galileo Versus the Geocentric Theory of the Universe, Britons Library, 1985, p.70.

Yes, most of the time they use the old geocentric system of navigation and it works for them. If any doubt this, go to the Encyclopedia Britannica and you will find the following:

‘For this purpose it is convenient first to consider the earth as fixed and to suppose the observer looking out from its centre…’ --- (Eclipse, p.869)

Of course it is, very convenient indeed. Now remember how they laughed at Aristotle presuming that if the earth were moving at great speed then things would get left behind? Recall then how empirical science showed that anything on a moving object takes up the same speed of that movement. In other words if a man jumped off a train doing 100mph then that man would leave the train at 100mph plus any extra speed of his jump. Let us now move on a few years to space flight. According to real physics, if a rocket leaves the earth that is supposed to be moving at 67,000mph, shouldn’t it leave the earth at its launch speed of 25,000mph plus its earth speed of 67,000mph, that is, at a true speed of 92,000mph? Now we have not bothered to check this out, but we bet NASA does not take this 67,000mph extra speed at initial take off of any spaceflight.

Impossible speeds for the stars

Let us finish here with the idea that the stars would have to travel at impossible speeds to rotate around the earth to be true. This is a philosophical illusion, for they would only have to travel at the same rate that the earth is supposed to rotate to bring about a day. In a geocentric scenario the universe is like a revolving-door. Now all parts of a revolving-door travel at the same time, no matter how big it is, irrespective of size. Thus the starry heavens, and indeed the sun, planets and moon move in unison around the earth as does a revolving door. And we can assure you, revolving doors are not an illusion. Here below a diagram of the universe acting like a revolving door with the earth as its centre.