Author Topic: THE EARTHMOVERS (Read 119228 times)

cantatedomino · « **Reply #50 on:** January 25, 2014, 12:19:01 PM »

THE EARTHMOVERS: Sigmund Freud believed science (including psychoanalysis) to have inflicted three severe blows to man’s perception of himself. In the sixteenth century Copernicus inflicted a cosmological blow by demonstrating that the earth moved around the sun, and was not the centre of the universe. In the nineteenth century Darwin inflicted a biological blow by showing man’s evolutionary continuity with the animals, and in the twentieth, his own emphasis on the unconscious determination of human behaviour dealt a drastic blow to man’s sense of psychological freedom. (Stephen Wilson: The B. Book of the Mind, Bloomsbury, 2003, p.312.)

There they are, in proper order, the three deceitful ‘scientific’ systems believed by most outside and inside the Catholic Church for many years now; Copernicus supposedly ‘demonstrating’ the earth moves, Darwin supposedly ‘showing’ we evolved from inorganic matter over ‘millions of years,’ and Freud ‘emphasising’ his psychology built upon the two earlier hoaxes. Nevertheless, this concoction is now the worldview, demonstrating modern man is now the rationalist model personified; and surrounded as he is with new technology and scientific advances, is now far too clever to believe he can be deceived by any such intellectual stealth.

Yet society was and society still is. Just look at the institutions that have been asserting these theories as absolutes for centuries, the academies, universities, colleges and institutions of every kind. Once the professors and teachers began to coach their students to regurgitate what the Royal Society of London insisted on since 1687 to achieve honours in their exams, true education stopped and indoctrination began. There was no escape from the fraud that told the world science proved this and that and the other. Truly there could be no greater deceit in the history of the world. And it will go on.

cantatedomino · « **Reply #51 on:** January 25, 2014, 12:20:54 PM »

THE EARTHMOVERS: This revolution was also applied to Catholic theology under the guise of neo-scholasticism to make it look Catholic. As a direct consequence of accepting the heliocentric and evolutionary worldview, a new synthesis with doctrine and dogma was thought necessary, for having perverted, abandoned and deprived the Church of its scholastic exegeses and theologically based philosophy by conceding to the new ‘sciences,’ the Copernicans thereby created a vacuum, inviting a novel theology to fill it.

A version of this new Hermetic theology - the dream of Giordano Bruno and Tommaso Campanella (1568–1639) of the 16th and 17th century, the ‘development of doctrine’ as they called it - was begun in the main by John Henry Newman (1801-1890), Cardinal Mercier (1851-1926), Canon Henry de Dorlodot (1865-1929), the Jesuit Karl Rahner, Urs von Balthasar, Henri de Lubac, Joseph Ratzinger (1927- ) and many other modernist reformers of the 20th century, a system of thought taken to bizarre heights by the new age advocate Fr Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955), a Jesuit priest who taught a Luciferian mindset; that Catholicism is not the only way to God.

The modernist takeover was completed at Vatican II, when one after the other the post-Vatican II popes elected were modernist.

When pragmatic churchmen, consciously or in ignorance, tried to marry heliocentric ‘certainty’ with the truth of Revelation, that is, tried to have the best of both worlds, trying to mix the teaching of the Church with the scientific ideas and fancies of the intellectual Hermetic, neo-Gnostic Earthmovers and sun fixers and their progeny, the long-age evolutionists and relativists, they plunged most Catholic teaching institutions into the camp of the modernists and Modernism, putting the faith of Catholics at risk, including the very credibility of Catholicism among the Church’s enemies and even within the flock itself.

Today, two hundred and fifty years after capitulating to Copernicanism, and sixty years after the Fathers of Vatican II consciously and deliberately condemned their predecessors who adhered to the 1616 decree as troublemakers, the Church’s reputation is now in shreds, its influence on world affairs is zero, its traditional teachings and doctrines rejected, perverted and ignored, its miracles and sainthood diminished, its sacraments devalued, its liturgy in chaos, forever undergoing revision, what is left of its priesthood and religious decimated and damaged by scandals, few seminaries and convents remain because of the dearth of vocations, many of its chapels and churches are shut up or near-empty, cleared of their sacramentals, tabernacles removed from the centre of the altars as the earth was removed from the centre of the world, others refurbished like shopping-centres, denuded of the sacred, the Vatican is now in the news more for its secular comment and ecuмenism than traditional teaching, and popes are now writing more books than church docuмents as well as having acquired the status of travelling pop-star celebrities. In effect, much of the institutional Church today is little more than an empty shell of its past, with salvation for all now preached in its churches, baptised or not in the name of Jesus Christ, in effect rendering the mission of the Church redundant.

Finally, Vatican II’s failure on all fronts has resulted in endless calls for renewal by clergy who don’t know where the Church is coming from or going to.

In 1965 that public was reading 'The Great Heresy' by the eminent Belgian philosopher Marcel De Corte, in which he defined the new orientations as “a spiritual degradation more profound than anything the Church has experienced in history, a cancerous sickness in which the cells multiply fast in order to destroy what is healthy in the Catholic Church;" he called them "an attempt to transform the kingdom of God into the kingdom of Man, to substitute for the Church consecrated to the worship of God, a Church dedicated to the cult of humanity. This is the most dreadful, the most terrible of heresies.” (The Angelus Online: December 1978.)

cantatedomino · « **Reply #52 on:** January 25, 2014, 12:23:17 PM »

Another destabilization strategy, one that has yet to reach its zenith of revolutionary efficacy, is the harnessing of electromagnetism. In the post-electricity world, day is night and night is day. Gone are the natural rhythms in the daily lives of men. Gone is sowing in the Spring and reaping in the Fall - electricity allows us to eat fruits forbidden by nature's seasons and freighted in from far away lands. Gone are the natural animal rhythms of sleep and waking - electricity allows man to see and work by night. Indeed the evil consequences of this terrible destabilization of human life are seen in the massive overmedication of people who cannot sleep, cannot rest, cannot stay awake, cannot work, cannot relax, cannot love.Another destabilization strategy, one that has yet to reach its zenith of revolutionary efficacy, is the harnessing of electromagnetism. In the post-electricity world, day is night and night is day. Gone are the natural rhythms in the daily lives of men. Gone is sowing in the Spring and reaping in the Fall - electricity allows us to eat fruits forbidden by nature's seasons and freighted in from far away lands. Gone are the natural animal rhythms of sleep and waking - electricity allows man to see and work by night. Indeed the evil consequences of this terrible destabilization of human life are seen in the massive overmedication of people who cannot sleep, cannot rest, cannot stay awake, cannot work, cannot relax, cannot love.

The electromagnetic plantation grid is now so dominant and oppressive, that physical, mental, and moral illness are pandemic.

Interestingly, as I mentioned before, in spite of all this frenzied destabilizing activity, nature always reasserts itself in the days, nights, months, years, and seasons that are perpetually and incorruptibly regulated by the celestial bodies. But what does Our Blessed Lord say about the times to come upon us shortly?

And immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven shall be moved. There shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, by reason of the confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves; Men withering away for fear, and expectation of what shall come upon the whole world. For the powers of heaven shall be moved.

This makes me believe that there is to come a time when even nature and its predictable cycles will abandon us to our evils. Wherefore let us make the most out of the natural order that remains to us for the time being, using it to help us restore in our lives whatever semblance of stability is possible.

The electromagnetic plantation grid is now so dominant and oppressive, that physical, mental, and moral illness are pandemic.

Interestingly, as I mentioned before, in spite of all this frenzied destabilizing activity, nature always reasserts itself in the days, nights, months, years, and seasons that are perpetually and incorruptibly regulated by the celestial bodies. But what does Our Blessed Lord say about the times to come upon us shortly?

And immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of heaven shall be moved. There shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, by reason of the confusion of the roaring of the sea and of the waves; Men withering away for fear, and expectation of what shall come upon the whole world. For the powers of heaven shall be moved.

This makes me believe that there is to come a time when even nature and its predictable cycles will abandon us to our evils.

cantatedomino · « **Reply #53 on:** January 25, 2014, 12:25:30 PM »

THE EARTHMOVERS: Were we to re-read our prologue once again; knowing with certainty that no science has falsified the geocentric revelation, we would witness how the Devil brought about a shocking loss of faith by popes, cardinals, bishops, priests and laity, since that U-turn began in 1741. No wonder then that the demise of the Catholic faith as an influence over the peoples of the earth accelerated as the doctrine of the Earthmovers advanced, diluting not only the words of the Bible but removing a crucial link to Almighty God that He had placed in His Creation as certain visible evidence of His existence.

Thomas Kuhn wrote a book called The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. He distinguished between normal science when research goes on using an accepted theory, or paradigm, and the times of crisis when there is a switch to a new and incommensurable paradigm….

These ideas have also been applied to theology, and the Second Vatican Council has been given as an example. (Peter Hodgson: Catholic Herald, 4th February, 2000.)

Here then is the truth of it; the Church of the 17th century was never proven or shown to be in error, not in its interpretation of Scripture, not in its metaphysics or philosophy, be it theological or natural, not in its 1616 papal decree, not in its judgement at Galileo’s trial, nor in its 1870 dogma of infallibility, as Fr Roberts argued in 1887. The true order of the cosmos was then and remains a matter beyond the reach of man’s empirical method, created thus by God no doubt. Unlike natural philosophy or modern science that has divorced itself from any preternatural or divine cause responsible for the creation or workings of natural things, and can dismiss the unattainable for what it believes has been proven enough, the Church is bound by its dogmas, doctrines and its own guarantees of divine protection from error when ruling on matters pertaining to the Catholic faith.

This being so, 400 years of the history of Church and science can also be seen for what it is - untrue. A million books, articles, lectures, plays, and TV programmes alluding to the Copernican revolution, all taking Newton’s theories as scientific facts, are now actually redundant as a real history of the human race, and yet, not one will acknowledge this fact. The illusion is far too entrenched for any truth to emerge.

So, it could be asked, why was there no Church recognition of the 1616 decree in 1905 when the world was awash with news of Albert Einstein’s acknowledgement of relative movement? Why didn’t Catholic physicists thereafter, such as the Abbé Georges Lemaître (1894-1966), friend of Einstein - or the ‘Pontifical Academy of the New Lynxes’ - spot the problem this relativity posed for the 1741-1835 heliocentric U-turn? And then remember there was Fr Gemelli, President of the Pontifical Academy of Science at Milan University telling all late in 1942 that there was never any such proof:

Galileo did not provide a decisive demonstration of Copernicanism, neither did Newton, Bradley or Foucault. - - - Fr. Agostino Gemelli, Milan 1942.

Well it is now clear why they refused to see what the astronomer Domenico Cassini (1625-1712) and many philosophers like Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859) knew before and after the 1741-1835 U-turn; a fact confirmed by Fr Gemelli of the PAS in 1942; that science proved nothing, never falsified the geocentric revelations of the Bible. Indeed, the question that could be asked now is did churchmen ever really believe there was real proof for Copernicanism or did they too ignore the 1616 decree on probabilities and choose pragmatism over faith in order to cease the ridicule from academia, philosophers, astronomers, scholars, writers etc., criticism the Church was subjected to at the time?

Yes, the victory of this Hermetic heliocentric fraud over the intellectual world was so complete that had churchmen even considered retention of faith at any time after Newton and Newman they would have been laughed out of it by the so-called intelligentsia. What churchmen, under such circuмstances, would put faith before science then or now, and risk the inevitable mockery from academics of every kind and the media publicity that would result from it? Just picture it, headlines beaming: ‘Rome reverts to biblical myth, the earth no longer moves.’ Martyrdom would have been a more preferable choice than such intellectual derision, and that is why they ignored and will continue to ignore the truth for the preferred ‘scientific’ view then and even now, no matter the truth.

Had they done the right thing in 1905, the internal damage might have been contained somewhat, for it could be shown that the popes of the U-turn, who uttered no personal criticism of their predecessors, were supplied with spurious information and were practically coerced into dropping the ban on books advocating Copernicanism while granting imprimaturs to others. Given Christian faith in so many scientifically non-provable things, a return to the interpretation of the Fathers would simply have added one more dogma to Catholic belief based on the literal interpretation of the Bible. As Cardinal Bellarmine said, ‘it would have been just as heretical to deny the Virgin Birth.’

cantatedomino · « **Reply #54 on:** January 25, 2014, 12:27:37 PM »

THE EARTHMOVERS: Exeunt Copernicus, Galileo and Newton as trustworthy prophets of the way the heavens really go. The only trouble is that theologians in particular and Christians in general are still blind to the tragedy behind this momentous turnabout after A.D. 1905. For the consequences of the choice between the above-mentioned alternatives have been, and are, far-reaching. The geocentric position virtually compels a man at least to believe in a metaphysical Designer, especially interested in mankind and our dwelling place in the heavens. It engenders worldviews of the Genesis type. The ruling model today, gradually and unavoidably developed as a result of the Copernican revolution, suggests that we are no more than a freak accident out of many, evolved somewhere in the universe about which we can say nothing with any measure of certitude or probability. (Walter van der Kamp: Bulletin of the Tychonian Society, p.22.)

The facts then conclude that the real order of the world rests beyond the reach of the empirical method, but not beyond revelation. Thus the 1616 decree was always one of faith to judge. The irony of it all is that had Galileo a real Catholic faith, he would have seen the truth.

I should judge that the authority of the Bible was designed to persuade men of those articles and propositions which, surpassing all human reasoning could not be made credible by science, or by any other means than through the very mouth of the Holy Spirit. - - - Letter to Christina, 1615.

Justice therefore demands the truth of it be restored within an institution that represents truth itself. It requires the history of the Galileo case be revisited again, not in an attempt to twist, turn and re-write the Church’s part in it as heretofore, but to tell it as it was, as it was recorded by the Church. To exonerate the Church from the mistakes from 1741, it requires a separation of official Church acts from the un-official personal opinions, actions and mistakes of U-turn churchmen, for the two are not the same and must be separated.

Accordingly, justice insists on an apology to all the ‘theologians’ who defended the Church’s 1616 decree right up to 1835 for what was said and thought of them, especially at Vatican II, by the 1981-1992 papal commission, by Pope John Paul II and other popes. Finally, let there be an end to the pseudo-canonisation of Galileo by modern churchmen, and let him be reinstated as the suspect of heresy that he was found guilty of in 1633.