CathInfo.com

The ordinary magisterium is not infallible.  The “ordinary and universal” magisterium is infallible.  The point being, BOD has not been a “universal” belief as most Church Fathers condemned it.  Sorry, you just don’t know history.

There is no Church teaching that you can reference that teaches this. But there are plenty of Church teachings that are contrary to all of this.

There are two possibilities for "BOB/BOD" to be true. What we mean by "BOD/BOB" being true, is that someone who has not been visibly baptized could still be saved :

A)BOD and BOB are theological descriptions of a particular case of baptism, that is performed invisibly by God or His angels on those who cannot get baptized by other means through no fault of their own. That is, every single member of the Church (after Revelation) has been baptized, even if it wasn't done by humans. That is a theological possibility.

B)BOD and BOB describe conditions of the soul of someone who is not baptized where their culpability is reduced or where the necessity of baptism is circuмvented by God, and God directly gives the effect of baptism without the required sacrament. The catechism you are using as a source describes this possibility, which is what St Thomas Aquinas wrote about.

An act of perfect contrition requires wanting to do God's will, even without knowing about Revelation. That is "implicit" desire for baptism, because it's impossible to know about baptism for someone who never heard of the Gospels or of the Christian religion at all.

Practically, there is almost no difference at all between the two positions, because there is no way to know about what God does invisibly unless He specifically reveals it to someone.

In fact, the more I examine this, the less I understand where the conflict lies.

What were we even getting angry about?