off the top of my head
1. He relentlessly pushed for mass 3rd world migration into Europe and North America. This was deliberate, calculated
genocide as outlined by the Kalergi plan. There have been countless rapes, murderers, robberies, stabbings, cнιℓd тrαffιcking, and untold billions taken from tax payers to fund their own displacement. 
2. He and his corrupt bishops profited by billions through NGOs like Catholic Charities, which resettled these illegal aliens and criminals.
3. He sought to deny the very sacraments that would enable the faithful to save their souls. 
4. He told Catholics that it would be a sin not to take the poisonous jab leading to untold numbers of people 
with chronic and fatal side effects. 
5. He profaned the Vatican itself by participating in pachamama worship
6. He continued to advance and protect known serial pedophiles like McCarrick
7. He pushed religious indifferentism 
8. Claimed that Martin Luther was right about sola fide

feel free to add this list.
I hope that when we get a holy pope he oversees a second cadaver synod and puts Begoglio on trial 

I wanna know whos downvoting you. Everything you said was an objective, very public-displayed fact. Whos our new plant in here.

It may simply be someone uncomfortable with the timing of so critical a comment - that being hours after his death. 

It may simply be someone uncomfortable with the timing of so critical a comment - that being hours after his death.

Yes, there's the old nil nisi bonum de mortuis sentiment out there where you should not speak ill of the dead (at least the recently departed).  I think that this doesn't apply so much to public figures, especially those who have done such great harm to the Church.  Speaking WELL of them just because they died recently could be construed as condoning their heresies and giving the impression that they weren't THAT bad.

I see not program with criticizing Bergoglio.

And even with less-public figures, let's say if someone at your chapel died, and he was an open sodomite or adulterer, or something along those lines.  Well, it wouldn't be appropriate to praise this individual just because he died.  "Well, he was a nice sodomite after all." ... giving the impression that niceness could offset the sin or that the sin wasn't "all that bad" or that God would overlook it at one's judgment.  And if you saw others making such comments, there may be an obligation to step in and reject those comments lest they corrupt others hearing them.

In the case of Bergoglio, it's not wrong to remind everyone of how wicked his teaching was lest those being swept away by mere emotion forget about it, and start to condone it.