BTNYC, you are right that "racism" is a Jєωιѕн category. But you still have to learn that "white" and "caucasian" are Jєωιѕн categories, too. Used to divide their enemies.
Look, I am German and I am what a Jєω might call white. I am not Polish, not French, not Hungarian, not Scandinavian, and not Anglosaxon. My father would have been ashamed if I had married a woman from any such countries.
Half of U.S. citizens have German ancestry. But they're mostly mixed. Irish, English, Spanish, Polish, etc. pp.
Your idea of white vs. Jєωιѕн is a Jєωιѕн idea to begin with. The Jєωιѕн nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr is against all non-Jєωs, not only against those who are "white". And you know it, BTNYC. These riots now are not primarily "black". They are Jєωιѕн. They easily succeed to instigate "blacks", and many "whites", too.
In Germany, where still most are German and nothing else, they're not able to instigate anything. People have been reeducated for decades to be idiot eco children and/or idiot porno addicts.
Forget about white and black! That's U.S. bull. It's City of God against ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan, and the latter is led by Jєωs and mostly "white" helpers.
It's tiresome to have made point after point on this subject over and over on his forum, in good faith, only to be met with responses that eschew countering those points with any intellectual honesty, in favor of bursts of emotivism and treacly aphorisms like "We're all God's children!" and "There are bad whites too!" that sound nice and say nothing. I get enough of this when attempting to talk to my aunts and uncles about this subject. If you're not a Boomer, congratulations are in order, for you've perfected their rhetorical style.
"White" is US shorthand for "European" - it predates the en masse arrival of Jєωs in the US by at least a century (see the 1790 Immigration act, for one obvious example). I agree that it's a hamfisted and superficial reduction of the better appellation "European," but it arose pretty naturally out of the unnatural condition in this country of the most starkly different races living in close proximity to one another - Sub-Saharan Africans and Europeans (i.e. blacks and whites). I see no need to get bogged down over applying commonly understood nomenclatures in their commonly understood manner, no matter how intent you seem to be to obfuscate the issue at hand by doing so.
As I've repeatedly said, yes, the Jєωs are instigating the civil unrest and racial strife, as they have since at least 1909. But the point is that the CONDITION WAS ALREADY THERE TO BE EXPLOITED. Racial diversity - especially racial diversity so stark as European and Sub-Saharan African, and especially racial diversity with a history of slavery behind it (a powderkeg of easily exploitable acrimony) is a proximate risk to a nation's very survival.
If you agree that "racism" is a Jєωιѕн category, then you've sense enough to see to what end it's directed: silencing, shaming, and neutralizing people of European Descent. It's never utilized in any other direction. Jєωs have contempt for all goyim, yes, that's true, but they have an especial animus for Europeans and they conduct their agenda most aggressively against Europeans and their colonial children (i.e. "whites"). Why? For one thing we're the most competent of their potential enemies (look at crime and intelligence racial statistics - or better yet, live them for 40 years like I did in New York City - and then talk to me about "forgetting black and white"), and second, and much more importantly, JєωS DO NOT DISTINGUISH RELIGION FROM RACE. These are inherently intertwined categories for them (thus they would rather kill the Son of God and call His Blood upon them as an eternal curse, than to accept that salvation has been opened to men of every race, and not just them), and they see Europe as their hated, eternal enemy: Christendom. No matter that they have succeeded in subverting the faith almost entirely and apostasy reigns supreme all over Europe and her daughter nations - the Jєωs still wage war on the peoples of Christendom: Europeans (i.e. white people). Else, how do you explain the Jєωιѕн role in immigration policies in Europe? Racial instigation groups in the US? Anti-white dekulakization narratives about "white privilege?" Rampant promotion of miscegenation in Jєωιѕн media? We are the new Edom to them - their ancient religious and racial enemy.
If you can't see that, you're either inoperably naïve, or an intellectual coward. Or perhaps a Boomer, and therefore, both.
Topic: The American Uncινιℓ ωαr or New Revolution? (Read 954 times)