At about the 17-minute mark, the Protestant notes that the prophecies of Malachi seem to be getting more accurate over the last 409 years.
At about the 18-minute mark, he says that the reason is because the cardinal electors have been deliberately choosing pope-elects who conform to the papal prophecies of Malachi.
Therefore, for example, they chose pope #110 (JPII), whose line in Malachi’s prophecy pertains to coming from the sun, as he was born on the day of a solar eclipse.
A bit strained, ain’t it? What are the odds there was such a candidate to deliberately choose???
And why would the hierarchy feel constrained to bear out a private revelation, as though it could impact upon the credibility of the Church, forcing the cardinals to play this game?
The reality seems just the opposite to what the prot is suggesting: the prophecies are either vague enough that one can find something about every pope to relate to the prophecy, or, the prophecies are legit.
But I don’t buy the idea that conclaves are consciously being decided in order to conform to Malachi’s prophecies, when there is no reason or benefit to do so.