I suspect, whoever she is, may be clinically insane.

That's a Jєωιѕн ranking system to classify goyim. Invented by William Stern.

Are you going to point out how, exactly, that system is flawed, or what makes its data worthless? If not, you're simply committing an Association Fallacy.

Presumably, the Jєωs wouldn't put a broken ranking system to work to give themselves a lot of false data, right? If anything, the fact that Jєωιѕн media goes out of its way to suppress and explain away racial IQ data might be an indication that that ranking system works a little too well. It is, after all, in accord with what common sense, observation, and anecdotal evidence has always told those of us honest enough to admit it: That blacks -as a group - routinely display lower intelligence than other racial groups, and a concomitant disproportionate propensity for violent crime, consistent with the impulsivity and shorter time preferences that comes with lower intelligence. In short, it destroys the Jєωιѕн narrative that "Racism" is the reason for all of black peoples' ills. "Oy vey! Soch meshugaas this whole "IQ" thing was!"

I mean, for crying out loud, 2+2=4 is now being called "racist." That insane level of rhetoric wouldn't be called for if the intelligence gap between whites and blacks were not so stark and ineffaceable.

So, if it's a Jєωιѕн invention, it's one that's blown up in their faces. It certainly wouldn't be the first time for these blowback artists.

Are you going to point out how, exactly, that system is flawed, or what makes its data worthless? If not, you're simply committing an Association Fallacy.

I'd say that rather you would have to show that "the system" is not flawed. The thing is, it is unclear, what is measured. They call the quantity they measure "IQ". But what does that mean? What is the meaning of the nominator and what is the meaning of the denominator?

And if you accept their description of these, you would have to show that the measuring method does indeed measure what they say it does.

Presumably, the Jєωs wouldn't put a broken ranking system to work to give themselves a lot of false data, right?

LOL. Ever heard of Corona, COVID, or curvature of space and time?

If anything, the fact that Jєωιѕн media goes out of its way to suppress and explain away racial IQ data might be an indication that that ranking system works a little too well. It is, after all, in accord with what common sense, observation, and anecdotal evidence has always told those of us honest enough to admit it: That blacks -as a group - routinely display lower intelligence than other racial groups, and a concomitant disproportionate propensity for violent crime, consistent with the impulsivity and shorter time preferences that comes with lower intelligence. In short, it destroys the Jєωιѕн narrative that "Racism" is the reason for all of black peoples' ills. "Oy vey! Soch meshugaas this whole "IQ" thing was!"

I mean, for crying out loud, 2+2=4 is now being called "racist." That insane level of rhetoric wouldn't be called for if the intelligence gap between whites and blacks were not so stark and ineffaceable.

So, if it's a Jєωιѕн invention, it's one that's blown up in their faces. It certainly wouldn't be the first time for these blowback artists.

Do you need IQ tests to compare African and European culture? To compare architecture, transport, etc. pp.?

Broken ranking system to give themselves a lot of false data? What about six trillion gassed Jєωs?

I'm confused. Are you saying the h0Ɩ0h0αx lies are primarily for the Jєωs themselves? Because that's what you're implying about IQ tests - that they're a ranking system for goyim - i.e. that the Jєωs use this data to rank and sort the gentiles, presumably from "best" to "worst."

The false "Shoah" data is for the goyim - to keep us silent in the face of Jєωιѕн chicanery. 

If the Jєωs concocted a ranking system that consistently gives data that destroys their own rabble-rousing "racism" narrative, such that their own media has to suppress this data, how does it benefit them?

Teacher says 2+2=4 is culturally biased Posted: 08 Jul 2020 10:33 AM PDT DAILYKENN.com -- Leftism exists in an abstract ideology that defies reality. Leftists are — quite literally — out of touch with reality. Think of it as induced psychosis; seeing what is not there (white privilege and systemic racism) and blinded to reality (black crime, IQ disparities). We could make a list. It would include math denial. According to Paul Joseph Watson, The far-left believes other reality-denying abstracts. • There are multiple genders (not just two). • Climate variations are man made. • Racism is systemic and permeates most everything, everywhere, all the time. • Only white people can be racists. • Economic disparities are due to social injustice rather than intelligence and aptitude. • White privilege is a phenomenon.   • Masculinity is a mental illness. • 2 + 2 = 4 is subjective to cultural influences. Think about it. The people who believe white racism is systemic also believe 2-plus-2 does not necessarily equal four.   The summation is: Marxism in all its apparitions is not grounded in reality, but emanates from the discredited mental meanderings of its namesake, Karl Marx. * What do you think?

I tell the children to pay attention at math class. As you know there were some adults who slept right through that class.

Not to defend little Miss Brittany, but I really think you're all missing a silent point. The New Math.  Common Core is at the core of this.  Notice she points out that 2+2=4 is not the only way of knowing.  That's so rigid.  According to Common Core there are many ways to come to the answer of 2+2 and some people, she thinks, do better with convoluted manipulation of concrete objects.  Enter Common Core.   Also notice she doesn't say 'only way of 'THINKING'.  She uses 'knowing'.  Apparently she, deep down, admits that some people don't think.  They know by manipulating things.