[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEaK2iaCmig]

There's relatively recent attention to the so-called "Southern Poverty" Law Center in topics on CathInfo, e.g.:

•   <https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/48-conservative-groups-demand-media-tech-companies-disavow-splc/>:
"48 conservative groups demand media, tech companies disavow SPLC" (June 25?, 2018)"}

Plus this, which didn't originally mention SPLC, but I dragged SPLC into the topic, starting with my "Reply #8":

•   <https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/what-is-it-about-cathinfo-blocked-in-libraries/msg596533/#msg596533>:
"SPLC?/Re: What is it about cathinfo? blocked in libraries[?]" (February 24, 2018)

Unlike your posting, those topics comprise readable text, and are thus--not to put too sharp a point on this--not simply the embedding of an unexplained video of undisclosed length by an undisclosed source.[×]

-------
Note ×: You're hereby unofficially advised [××] that some members and other readers of CathInfo have chosen to impose substantial limits on the time they allow themselves on the Internet.  Postings that fail to provide plain text that introduces or summarizes any video imbedded in a C.I. topic (esp. if it's the original posting), explaining why any C.I. readers should spend time passively watching yet another video, is unhelpful at best, and arguably downright inconsiderate [××] toward your fellow C.I. members.  Thus the thumb-down, which was from me.

Note ××: "Unofficially" because I do indeed understand that I'm neither the owner nor a moderator of C.I..  Yes, I know that there are established C.I. members who do exactly what I oppose herein; alas, I've had to make my peace with them being incorrigible.  But one can still have hope for a "Newbie" seeing the light.