Author Topic: Sodomite wedding ring finger (Read 2202 times)

PG · « **on:** August 17, 2015, 12:24:57 PM »

http://www.rt.com/usa/312610-gαy-couple-denied-marriage/

This is suspicious. This rt article shows a picture where sodomites wear their wedding ring on the right ring finger. And, that is the same finger that bishops wear a ring on. Has this always been the case with sodomite rings?

Bp. faure may have good sense in not wearing an episcopal ring. I saw a picture of him recently, and he was not wearing one. And, here is food for thought. The three new NO bishops sent by francis in my area of Los Angeles aren't wearing the episcopal ring. They all also wear his dove/sheep pewter cross.

TKGS · « **Reply #1 on:** August 17, 2015, 12:34:07 PM »

Until recently, they never even contemplated anything like marriage. I presume that they're just doing something "queer" because they know they are merely mocking marriage. I doubt very highly that the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs pretending marriage have any idea what hand or finger Catholic bishops wear their ring on (I didn't know until recently).

I don't fully know what the episcopal ring is supposed to signify so I don't know enough to comment on bishops not wearing one.

Marlelar · « **Reply #2 on:** August 17, 2015, 01:25:35 PM »

I have seen pictures of "married" ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs and they have worn rings on their left hands.

PG · « **Reply #3 on:** August 17, 2015, 01:57:31 PM »

tkgs - you would be surprised. These are the things that naturalists attend to. And, the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ movement is led by jews. For example, a rabbi speech I heard(youtube) admitted that jews of the middle ages copied the catholics in wearing the yarmulke. But, it is only bishops that wear that(the zucchetto). So, when fαɢɢօts decide to all of a sudden not fit in with the marriage crowd they insist on fitting in with, and instead decide to fit in with another crowd(bishops), you have to stop and wonder. I do anyways. But, it sounds as if it is not their universal practice.

TKGS · « **Reply #4 on:** August 17, 2015, 02:33:05 PM »

Quote from: + PG +

tkgs - you would be surprised.

You have a point. And, yes, I probably would be surprised. The things that are going on in the world today are constant sources of surprise for me. But...unless the photo you saw was engineered by the puppet masters, you just have two fαɢɢօts doing something they think will shock. So much of what people do today is based on doing something unexpected in order to shock the sensibilities of ordinary people. It's also possible that the photo itself was inadvertently transposed by a graphics artist while touching something up. I've seen that happen in strange incidents as well.

But you are right (and that's two buts in my comments and they cancel each other out) the enemy does indeed attend to these things and it is possible that there is something to what you wrote above. By the way, the left hand ring finger is not a universal location for wedding bands, though it is in much of the West.

Does anyone out there really know the history and symbolism of the episcopal ring who can explain why they are worn and what significance a bishop not wearing one would present?