Pearce says some good things in some of his talks and writings, but I do have a real problem with him. What say ye regarding the strong critique of Pearce in these two linked articles? I'd sincerely like to know your response to this critique if you feel free to offer one.
I completely ignore what Dr. Pierce says about Christianity and his own pagan beliefs. I only pay attention to his wise and practical advise about preserving our race and being on guard against humanity's arch threat - the Jews.
I already knew about Dr. Pierce's anti-Catholic position and his unbelief in The Logos. I knew he was some sort of pagan who believed the universe as a whole is the intelligent force, or something along those lines. It's a shame he never converted to the Catholic Faith.
Any other alleged personal faults of Pierce doesn't matter. It's alleged anyway. Jews lie about anyone opposed to them.
Both Pierce and "Darkmoon" (the writer of the critiques against Pierce) err in their exegesis. Pierce attacks a strawman, while Darkmoon defends "Christianity" with wrong biblical interpretations.
Darkmoon's subsequent critique is mostly about JB Campbell, not about Pierce. Btw, Campbell is a deep undercover, FBI stooge.