Author Topic: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer (Read 5108 times)

Yeti · « **Reply #20 on:** April 16, 2024, 10:33:25 AM »

Quote from: Seraphina on April 16, 2024, 09:53:11 AM

Exactly when she died, I do not know, but the Sr. Lucy who claimed the consecration was done was NOT the same person.

.

No kidding. The whole point of the fake Sr. Lucy was so she could say a lot of things the real one would NEVER have said, including about the consecration of Russia, approving the fake "3rd secret", approving of JP2, the Novus Ordo, and so on. Basically they wanted to use someone who saw Our Lady to give a fake heavenly approval to the new church, and since the real one wouldn't do such a thing, they had to create an imposter.

Twice dyed · « **Reply #21 on:** April 19, 2024, 09:48:56 PM »

I was searching for a video" ..the smoke of satan has entered..." because of a new post, and in this short video at the 1:31 Time, there is a wonderful picture of Sister Lucy of Fatima. Old picture - young face. Is this the REAL Sister Lucy.?? Pictures of the fake lucy visiting with JP II is when she was quite old,( born in 1907) but she has a young face. ??? That detail in itself cries out Fraud!

Twice dyed · « **Reply #22 on:** April 23, 2024, 10:33:34 AM »

2017 / 2018
https://fsspx.news/en/news/interview-bishop-bernard-fellay-fatima-centenary-church-crisis-18544

...Maike Hickson:What is, in your own view, the reason for the continued hesitancy of those people in the Church who could disclose, for the greater good, much more information? What do they still have to fear or to lose? Would such a disclosure not be an act of mercy toward the suffering Church in this deep crisis?

+Fellay: " I remember that Sr. Lucy, in an interview with a cardinal from India in the mid-1990s, was very afraid that the Pope would publish the Secret. She said, if she were to give the Holy Father advice, she would caution great prudence. If, for instance, the text contained something like the coming of the Antichrist or something else quite serious that would cast grave doubt on the authority of the Church, it could be a reason the same authorities are hesitant to publish this. I don’t pretend these examples are the case; I am simply speculating as to what some possible reasons might be for not releasing it. "

Never heard of this before, but just one more example of what the "Fake sister Lucy" would spout. We all know that BVMary/ Sister Lucia wanted the secret opened by 1960 !!!

P.S. Did the newSociety say that the Fatima Apparitions were private??? Oh yeah, just greatest miracle witnessed by 70,000 souls. !! ● • ● ○
Talk about the letter of the law that killeth.
BTW we are the Church M ilitant! Pray!

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer (Read 5108 times)

Yeti

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer

Twice dyed

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer

Twice dyed

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer