Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer  (Read 5110 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2024, 11:05:15 PM »
My grandparents found out about the description issues of Lucia in the book Our Lady of Fatima by William T. Walsh (published 1954). Mr. Walsh met with Lucia in 1946. They also found about it more from Horvat.

https://www.traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g12htArt2_TwoSisterLucys.htm


Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2024, 11:35:21 PM »
I've always wondered about the entry of her death in her orders records (#265) inserted amongst the deaths for 2005.  The name and the birthdate are correct. Was someone trying to reveal the truth?
Click to enlarge
https://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/WebSources/B_741_LucyDeath.png


Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2024, 04:24:05 AM »
So, where does that leave the Church with regard to Fatima?
Where does that leave the Catholic Church in the eyes of the world?
Will they say its a made up religion that needs frauds like that?
Read the comments to the Fatima centers.

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2024, 06:46:39 AM »
I've always wondered about the entry of her death in her orders records (#265) inserted amongst the deaths for 2005.  The name and the birthdate are correct. Was someone trying to reveal the truth?
Click to enlarge
https://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/WebSources/B_741_LucyDeath.png
That is strange given that otherwise the list is for people who died in the early 2000's. I'd like to see the original source.

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2024, 08:01:11 AM »
It all seems pretty much open and shut. 

Best case scenario, the real Sister Lucia died naturally, and for whatever reason, they enlisted another woman to play the part of Lucia, either (a) to have a convenient shill for Newchurch, (b) as good public relations, to be able to trot out a living Lucia on demand, or (c) both.  Worst case scenario, they either imprisoned or, God forbid, killed the real Lucia, to be able to have the kind of shill I described above, to keep the "real Lucia" from denouncing Newchurch, and/or to keep wraps on what the Third Secret really was. 

Being able to have "Lucia" say that the consecration of Russia had taken place, and had been accepted by Our Lord and Our Lady would have just been icing on the cake.