Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer  (Read 5113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline Yeti

  • Supporter
Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2024, 04:24:34 PM »
Glad they're finally waking up and seeing what has been obvious to everyone for decades.


Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2024, 04:29:01 PM »
Glad they're finally waking up and seeing what has been obvious to everyone for decades.
As far as I'm aware it only became obvious to people after the Dimond brothers broke the story, for which no one gives them credit just like so many converts to the true faith came through them but won't acknowledge it after they reject EENS dogma.

https://youtu.be/VB_hUdRKi4o?si=hn46xg3tfxOKj2tU

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2024, 06:16:03 PM »
As far as I'm aware it only became obvious to people after the Dimond brothers broke the story, for which no one gives them credit just like so many converts to the true faith came through them but won't acknowledge it after they reject EENS dogma.
You are right here.  The first time I heard this was from the Dimond Brothers.  My initial gut reaction was that it was a kooky conspiracy theory--like all the others.  It was actually after realizing that the difference between a conspiracy theory and the absolute truth so often time that I relooked at their presentation and decided that they were making some really good points.  I have never heard why Chojnowski decided to get involved in the matter, but his organization has pretty much definitively proven the case.

As a side note, the time between "conspiracy theory" and "truth" seems to have shrunk over years from decades to weeks and sometimes even days.

Re: ‘Sister Lucy’ Was Not the Real Fatima Seer
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2024, 07:48:00 PM »
As far as I'm aware it only became obvious to people after the Dimond brothers broke the story, for which no one gives them credit ...

https://youtu.be/VB_hUdRKi4o?si=hn46xg3tfxOKj2tU

I don't think so.  I don't know when that video was made, but I think it became obvious to people after Marian T. Horvat did her photo analysis, and that was ~2006.  The Dimonds might have figured it out before she did, but I don't remember people speaking of this nor becoming convinced until after the Horvat article, and it still took years for some folks to become convinced.  Maybe it was some combination of the two (i.e. Horvat & Dimonds).