Author Topic: Sister Lucia and Opus Dei (Read 2907 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #1 on:** December 24, 2025, 06:42:58 PM »

I did not know about his Opus Dei connection ... extremely interesting.

Opus Dei set up shop in Coimbra, their first location in Portugal, at a location that was not of any great importance in Portugal overall, in 1946, but then in 1948 Sister Lucia allegedly requested to be transferred there, and Escriva claims to have met with Sister Lucia just days before they rolled out the imposter for Montini's visit.

Now, Montini helped orchestrate her transfer to Coimbra ... but, really, why? What did he have to do with Sister Lucia, being the Archbishop of Milan?

Twice dyed · « **Reply #2 on:** December 24, 2025, 07:49:44 PM »

https://www.france-catholique.fr/La-vie-cachee-de-Soeur-Lucie.html

Mainstream media outlet.

Google translate...want any clarifications? just PM .

"A few years of public life in Fatima and a life hidden until her “birth in Heaven” at 97, in Coimbra: this is what the Carmelite shows where the little shepherdess of Aljustrel, Lucie dos Santos, lived in the school of the Virgin Mary and Saint Teresa.

Even today the baptized are not mistaken: the groups of visitors succeed each other from half an hour to half an hour in the chapel of brown wood enhanced by gold by the Portuguese baroque and “at the memorial”, this small museum of the daily life of a Carmelite so simply extraordinary.

To remove her from the curious who left neither she nor her family in peace, the Bishop of Fatima, Bishop José Aves Correira da Silva, had entrusted her education to the Porto college of the Sisters of St. Dorothy – founded by Saint Paola Frassinetti in the 19th century. In a seventh apparition, the Virgin Mary confirmed to Lucy the bishop’s choice.

She left her village of Aljustrel, at the gates of Fatima, on June 16, 1921, after four years that could be called “public life”. The separation was painful.
And it was during her three years of college that she gave her whole life to God definitively by a vow of perpetual chastity, on August 26, 1923. It was with the canonization of Saint Teresa of Lisieux, by Pope Pius XI, on May 17, 1925, that she heard the call to Carmel. But the Portuguese Republic prohibited communities that had no social commitment. Then Lucie thought she would learn French and postulate at the Carmel of Lisieux.
Finally, she learned Spanish, at the novitiate of the Sisters of St. Dorothea in Galicia, in Pontevedra, where she entered at eighteen and a half years old.
But the call to Carmel will be stronger. The Carmelites were expelled from the Carmel of Coimbra in 1910. They could not return to Coimbra until 1933, and to the Carmel, previously occupied by the military, only in 1946. It took two interventions by Pope Pius XII himself for Lucy to have the bishop’s permission to join them, after more than 21 years of apostolic religious life, on

March 25, 1948, at 5:30 a.m. **

It was the Annunciation and the Holy Thursday. She took the habit two months later, on May 13, 1947, thirty years after the first appearance at the Cova da Iria. She was 41. One can ask for her intercession for the vocations that are unsure on the place where to embody the call of God.
She will live there 57 years of a hidden life, apart from the four visits of a pope to Fatima, each time on May 13: Paul VI in 1967, and John Paul II in 1982, 1991 and 2000.
The small museum dedicated to Sister Lucie in Coimbra allows to grasp a little of this aura of the days around the prayer life of the community but the essential must still be revealed: we expect a lot from the process in beatification that has entered its Roman phase.
The diocesan trial, opened on April 30, 2008, less than 5 years after the death of Sister Lucie, thanks to an exemption from Benedict XVI, ended on February 13, 2017, twelfth anniversary of his death. It made it possible to gather 15 483 pages of docuмents, ordered in 19 sealed coffers of red wax and sent to Rome, to the Congregation for the Causes of Saints. ***
To gather these docuмents it took the work of two bishops, two postulators, three vice-postulators, eight people for the historical commission. There were 61 testimonies, including those of a cardinal, four bishops, thirty-four lay people and Carmelites.
The closing ceremony was presided over by Bishop Virgilio Antunes of Coimbra. The postulator, Father Carmelite Romano Gambalunga, cited the bliss of pure hearts to describe Sister Lucia.
The Roman phase of the trial must first focus on the examination of the human and Christian virtues of the little shepherdess who became Carmelite, in the light of her many writings, including an abundant correspondence. It will result in the writing of a positio, a spiritual biography of Sister Lucia.
At the Memorial of Coimbra, we discover a thousand objects of the life of Lucie dos Santos, who became Carmelite under the name of Sister Marie Lucie of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart, such as her rosary offered by John Paul II, her first handwritten notebook, a white cape and a brown carmelite garment, her works embroidered with gold, photos, her electronic typewriter, suitcases of mail...she died the next day.

To prepare for the revelation of the “third secret” in the year 2000, John Paul II had sent the future Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone – then “number two” to the Doctrine of the Faith – to meet Sister Lucia. She will confirm that the request of the Virgin Mary was satisfied by the consecration of the world to her Immaculate Heart on March 25, 1984, that the published secret is complete – “I know no other” 1 – and that the interpretation given of it is correct. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger will present his theological commentary with Bishop Bertone at the Vatican on June 26, 2000 and the docuмentation – including the facsimile of Lucy’s writings – is freely accessible on the Vatican website*.
She rests while waiting for the resurrection of the flesh in the basilica of the Trinity of Fatima, her tomb is next to that of Saint Jacintah, and in front of that of St. Francis Marto.

She was six years old, when she made her first confession, out loud, not knowing that it was necessary to whisper for the priest only. The priest, Father Cruz, advised her to go then to ask Mary for the grace of always having Jesus in his mind. She chose one of the statues of the Virgin, knelt down and said this prayer several times. And she saw the Virgin smile at her.
In Carmel, at the end of her life, in 2003, she will also see the tears of the Virgin. The statue of the Mirse who cried is in the Carmel Chapel, surrounded by the small statues (...) Jacinta and Francis.
One could say that the life of the little shepherdess carried, for her first communion in the arms of her brother, from their village of Aljustrel to the church of her baptism, so as not to dirty her beautiful white robe, lived all her life under the sign of the smile and tears of the Virgin Mary. And that she teaches to do the same for the love of God that had his heart beat since childhood and the salvation of the “poor sinners.” And also for the love of the Holy Father that they loved so much - the three of them.
This does not prevent to go see the fascinating film-investigation of Pierre Barnérias, M and the Third Secret, released in 2014..."

************
** 5:30 am. !!! Were they hiding something or SOMEONE??!!...

***Can we presume that many of the precious docs of Fr. Alonso were forwarded to Rome...? The OP video asks if anyone had info on their most recent location.

Incredulous · « **Reply #3 on:** **Yesterday** at 11:48:20 PM »

Quote from: cassini on December 24, 2025, 06:18:57 AM

Cassini, Thanks for posting this video.

About a year ago, CI member "Persto" started an Opus Dei topic that is now at 56 pages.

In that topic are many Opus Dei scandals which allow Catholics to understand OD is a highly criminal, Masonic organization operating behind the scenes of newChurch .

Amongst those posts were quotes by the crypto jew, Josemaria Escriva mocking the true St. Lucia after he visited her.

This video helps to confirm that Opus Dei penetrated the Portuguese hierarchy, and eventually murdered the real Sr. Lucia and replaced her with an Opus Dei nun.

I would like to add, that if you follow the full logic of the Fatima conspiracy, it makes Fr. Gruner complicit in the Opus Dei Fatima coverup too.

Why?
He admitted in June 2009 that knew the 1960's Sr. Lucy was a fraud. but he didn't say anything publicly for fear of alienating his Novus ordo donors.

Incredulous · « **Reply #4 on:** **Today** at 12:01:06 AM »

Quote from: Twice dyed on December 24, 2025, 07:49:44 PM

***Can we presume that many of the precious docs of Fr. Alonso were forwarded to Rome...? The OP video asks if anyone had info on their most recent location.

It would seem unlikely that the lying murdering jew, Josemaria Escriva would allow the 24 Volumes of true Fatima history to exist.

Perhaps a 2nd copy was made and hidden. since Father Alonso knew that the Church's enemies wanted to destroy the truth.

alaric · « **Reply #5 on:** **Today** at 08:04:38 AM »

Quote from: Incredulous on Today at 12:01:06 AM

It would seem unlikely that the lying murdering jew, Josemaria Escriva would allow the 24 Volumes of true Fatima history to exist.

Perhaps a 2nd copy was made and hidden. since Father Alonso knew that the Church's enemies wanted to destroy the truth.

Ironic you would accuse him of that since he was an alleged supporter of Hitler and Franco and vehement anti communist.

Do you have any docuмentation of those accusations of him being a murderer or marrano jew before you slander a saint in the RC Church?

Twice dyed · « **Reply #6 on:** **Today** at 11:40:31 AM »

Looks like there was even corruption in the canonisation process!?? You can't trust Modernists...

https://odan.org/tw_opposition_to_canonization
"...17. Officials of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Causes of Saints not only gave the cause top priority but, as the official positio on Escriva shows, they also bent rules to exclude damaging evidence about Escriva’s character and commitment to the church.

18. The positio claims that the volatile Escriva lost his temper only once, yet many former members who knew him will insist he was routinely abusive of anyone suspected of being an enemy of Opus Dei, including Pope John XXIII and Paul VI. Former numerary Maria del Carmen Tapia relates in her book Beyond the Threshold: A Life in Opus Deithat Escriva routinely lost his temper, and that as secretary in charge of writing down his words and actions, she was not allowed to right down anything negative that she witnessed. She herself was subjected to abusive words from Escriva, who called her the most filthy names, e.g. WHORE, SOW, PIG, and then screamed during this meeting with both men and women present, that someone should “pull down her panties…. and give her a spanking,” referring to a fellow numerary woman who had assisted Tapia by mailing letters for her. Regarding this statement, a supporter of ODAN wrote the following: “This is the most bizarre and perverted talk coming from anyone, man or woman, but for a man to say this to an adult woman…for a priest to use this language and make this statement to a woman; for a saint to make this statement, completely perverts not only the rules of civilized behavior, but sanctity itself. There is no excuse for this conduct, no excuse at all. This, in and of itself, belies his sanctity.”

19. A Vatican source said, contrary to established procedure, no published writings critical of Escriva were included in the docuмents given to the judges of his cause; nor did the congregation investigate Escriva’s celebrated conflicts with the Jesuits, reports of his pro-fascist leanings and Opus Dei’s involvement with the Franco government.

20. 40% of the testimony came from just two men, (Alvaro) Portillo (deceased Opus Dei prelate and Escriva’s successor) and his assistant Father Javier Echevarria, (current Opus Dei prelate).

21. Although 1,300 bishops and cardinals from all over the world had written to the Vatican giving positive statements on the Opus Dei founder, only 128 of them had actually met him in person.
22. According to [Woodward’s] research, Opus Dei members allegedly have put hundreds of bishops under financial pressure in order to have them send positive reports about Escriva to the Vatican. Especially in the Third World, bishops were allegedly told that financial contributions from Opus Dei might be in jeopardy if they did not answer the request for positive testimony.

23. The “devil’s advocate” that had been part of the canonization process before 1983 was replaced by a “relator”; thus the door was open for the rapid canonization of Escriva. (Note that the current Opus Dei prelate at the time, Portillo, was part of the committee that eliminated the devil’s advocate.)

..."

Freind · « **Reply #7 on:** **Today** at 11:48:06 AM »

Quote from: Twice dyed on Today at 11:40:31 AM

Looks like there was even corruption in the canonisation process!?? You can't trust Modernists...

https://odan.org/tw_opposition_to_canonization
"...17. Officials of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Causes of Saints not only gave the cause top priority but, as the official positio on Escriva shows, they also bent rules to exclude damaging evidence about Escriva’s character and commitment to the church.

18. The positio claims that the volatile Escriva lost his temper only once, yet many former members who knew him will insist he was routinely abusive of anyone suspected of being an enemy of Opus Dei, including Pope John XXIII and Paul VI. Former numerary Maria del Carmen Tapia relates in her book Beyond the Threshold: A Life in Opus Deithat Escriva routinely lost his temper, and that as secretary in charge of writing down his words and actions, she was not allowed to right down anything negative that she witnessed. She herself was subjected to abusive words from Escriva, who called her the most filthy names, e.g. WHORE, SOW, PIG, and then screamed during this meeting with both men and women present, that someone should “pull down her panties…. and give her a spanking,” referring to a fellow numerary woman who had assisted Tapia by mailing letters for her. Regarding this statement, a supporter of ODAN wrote the following: “This is the most bizarre and perverted talk coming from anyone, man or woman, but for a man to say this to an adult woman…for a priest to use this language and make this statement to a woman; for a saint to make this statement, completely perverts not only the rules of civilized behavior, but sanctity itself. There is no excuse for this conduct, no excuse at all. This, in and of itself, belies his sanctity.”

19. A Vatican source said, contrary to established procedure, no published writings critical of Escriva were included in the docuмents given to the judges of his cause; nor did the congregation investigate Escriva’s celebrated conflicts with the Jesuits, reports of his pro-fascist leanings and Opus Dei’s involvement with the Franco government.

20. 40% of the testimony came from just two men, (Alvaro) Portillo (deceased Opus Dei prelate and Escriva’s successor) and his assistant Father Javier Echevarria, (current Opus Dei prelate).

21. Although 1,300 bishops and cardinals from all over the world had written to the Vatican giving positive statements on the Opus Dei founder, only 128 of them had actually met him in person.
22. According to [Woodward’s] research, Opus Dei members allegedly have put hundreds of bishops under financial pressure in order to have them send positive reports about Escriva to the Vatican. Especially in the Third World, bishops were allegedly told that financial contributions from Opus Dei might be in jeopardy if they did not answer the request for positive testimony.

23. The “devil’s advocate” that had been part of the canonization process before 1983 was replaced by a “relator”; thus the door was open for the rapid canonization of Escriva. (Note that the current Opus Dei prelate at the time, Portillo, was part of the committee that eliminated the devil’s advocate.)

..."

If you believe a man is a true pope who canonized a person, that means you must believe the Saint is truly a Saint.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #8 on:** **Today** at 12:23:20 PM »

Quote from: Freind on Today at 11:48:06 AM

If you believe a man is a true pope who canonized a person, that means you must believe the Saint is truly a Saint.

R&R have to throw the infallibility of canonizations under the bus to save the Conciliar Church. I just wonder where they draw the line, what are they not willing to throw under the bus, calling Holy Mother Church a whore just so they can put up their Bergoglio / Prevost posters in the vestibule.

So, the standard R&R theory is that Conciliar canonizations are not infallible since their process is defective. Of course, that makes "infallibility" no longer a divine guarantee but the outcome of human diligence, and what says mistakes had not been made in prior canonizations. This is again their "have their Pope and eat him too" position, where they can uphold that the pre-Conciliar saints are certainly saints, but there's doubt about Saint Montini, Patron of Sodomites.

Mark 79 · « **Reply #9 on:** **Today** at 01:46:44 PM »

Quote from: Mark 79 on December 26, 2025, 12:07:22 AM

Excellent production quality, but I think there are three key weaknesses in the vid.

(1) The 1967 photo is indeed pivotal in exposing the substitution of the imposter for the real Sr. Lucy, but the vid does not address another layer of fraud—the 1967 photo is a pre-Photoshop composite. Forensic analysis of the photo reveals that Montini was "double-exposed" (the Photoshop of its day) into the photo with the imposter. Look at the tip of Montini's left index finger. It displays a clumsy artefact of the double exposure-the tip is a distinctly unnatural straight line. I also recall seeing the base photo that is exactly the same as the fraud, except that Montini is not in the photo at all. Hence, two layers of fraud: (1) the imposter and (2) Montini wasn't even in the original photo.

(2) Any fan of the Perry Mason or Columbo genres knows that motive is one of the keystones to obtain a conviction. The vid only briefly discusses the diametrically opposite theologies of the real Sr. Lucy (detachment from the world and penance) and the Opus JuDei/imposter theology (embrace the world), but the vid completely avoids discussing the motive for removing Sr. Lucy—the subversion of the Church at a Council called by the Masonic Anti-Pope and promulgated by the Sodomite Anti-Pope spear-headed by the forces of the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan.

(3) No mention of the distinctly anti-Catholic Judaizing Kabbalistic theology of Opus JuDei's founding Marrano or of his behavioral perversities: https://archive.ph/PjGsd

Side note: Since archive.is has been under attack by the Jews, it is increasingly difficult to access that archive via VPN. Ostensibly archive.is is under attack due to "digital rights infringement" (=Jew lawfare to ensure Jew profit), but archive.is and other mirrors of archive.today have archived considerable "antisemitic" evidence against the Jews. Hence, attacks to block and disappear archive.today are a "two-fer" for the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan.

https://www.cathinfo.com/members-only/opus-dei-72878/msg1012424/#msg1012424

Author Topic: Sister Lucia and Opus Dei (Read 2907 times)

cassini

Sister Lucia and Opus Dei

Ladislaus

Re: Sister Lucia and Opus Dei

Twice dyed

Re: Sister Lucia and Opus Dei

Incredulous

Re: Sister Lucia and Opus Dei

Incredulous

Re: Sister Lucia and Opus Dei

alaric

Re: Sister Lucia and Opus Dei

Twice dyed

Escriva a Saint?... Opus Dei, Rules were bent!

Freind

Re: Escriva a Saint?... Opus Dei, Rules were bent!

Ladislaus

Re: Escriva a Saint?... Opus Dei, Rules were bent!

Mark 79

Re: Escriva a Saint?... Opus Dei, Rules were bent!