This is 2013, and one sermon (actually it was two, but who's counting?)
by Msgr. Perez raises a few eyebrows. So what else is new?
Twenty-seven years ago, one Fr. John O'Connor gave a similar talk about
the Antichrist that raised a few eyebrows at the time. By today's
standards, it was a pretty tame presentation. But it got him in trouble.
He was a parish priest in Detroit, Michigan in 1986, and if you don't recall,
that was the year of Assisi I. After Fr. O'Connor gave this sermon on
the Antichrist, he was shipped off to a "psychiatric evaluation" by which
the NovusOrdo regime finds some other reason to accuse their more
traditional priests of being unfit for the occupation of serving a parish,
or whatever it is they have in mind from which they'd like to remove him.
While Fr. O'Connor has it wrong here in a few points (he dares to predict
what would happen within the following 14 years and those events did
not in fact take place, such as WWIII), he is nonetheless correct in a lot
of other things (categorically in all the historical items he mentions).
And just as today Fr. O'Connor is vindicated in this speech from the
perspective of Traditional Catholics looking back 26 years, so too will
Msgr. Perez be vindicated in the future, when we look back at his talk
on the same topic. BTW, in the sermon of Msgr. Perez that I heard
(this thread is about the Antichrist) he did not say that Obama is "the"
Antichrist but rather that his name curiously fits Scriptural prophesy
in far more ways than could possibly be by mere chance, and that as
such, we are ever closer to how the real Antichrist will one day fulfill
all of the prophesies. Furthermore, while such fulfillment will be a
thing that is easy to discern by those with eyes to see and ears to
hear, nonetheless the vast majority of mankind will be blind and
deaf to the truth of God, and therefore will not be able to understand
that they are living through the reign of Antichrist.
Here is a partial transcript of the talk of Fr. John O'Connor from 1986:
starting at minute 14:00
Even Christ recognizes satan as the king of evil and infernal cunning.
...uses every means and all forms to destroy faith and morality. This
was spoken 45 years ago, long before abortion, a million and a
half babies every year in the United States, 55 million abortions
throughout the world! This was before drugs became a pandemic
in the United States, before pornography, before child abuse, before
homosexuality and all those other perversions that are spreading like
like a melanoma cancer throughout the world.
Satan, the pontiff warned us, uses all forms to destroy faith and
morality. And finally, he concluded, God and the evil one, have
come to grips in a gigantic duel, a battle, the most ferocious, the
most bitter the world has ever known, has been joined, and you
and our fellow Catholics throughout the world are now locked in
this battle that is the most bitter and the most ferocious the world
has ever seen.
Just about a hundred years ago, the then-reigning pontiff Leo XIII
was finishing Mass in the morning, and he had a vision, and he saw
satan standing before Christ enthroned in the tabernacle. And
satan was boasting. He said, "Within a hundred years, I will
destroy your Church!" Leo XIII was so shaken, that he fell to his
knees. He had to be assisted into the sacristy by his assistants.
As soon as he was composed, this is when he sat down and
composed that beautiful prayer to Saint Michael that WE USED TO
SAY after every Low Mass, to defend the Church, and to defend us,
in this hour of battle. What a good thing it would be if each of us
were to start saying that prayer again, every day.
[At the time of this speech, in 1986, a number of good priests who
had been expelled from their orders or from their chancery offices
(not unlike how XSPXSGBF has been expelling good priests), had
continued to pray these "Leonine Prayers" -- and this too would
happen to Fr. O'Connor not long after this speech.]
Yet, the prophet Dan in the Old Testament, chapter 12 verse 10,
he warned that when the great Antichrist finally did appear in
the world scene, the vast majority of mankind would be caught
totally unaware that his reign was beginning. Indeed, St. Paul
tells us in his first letter to the Thessalonians, that the beginning
of the reign of the Antichrist would actually be hailed by most
people as the dawn of a new era of peace and security.
The main question that I would like to address this afternoon is:
How can we recognize the Antichrist should he come within the
lifetime of most of us here, how can we recognize him?
What are the marks, fortold in the Bible, by which we will know
he is in fact, THE Antichrist? And what will his reign over the world
Both the Old and the New Testament contain many descriptions
of the Antichrist and his reign, as well as Sacred Tradition, which
has preserved for us the preaching of the Apostles, as recorded
by the early Martyrs and Saints of the Church.
In describing the Antichrist this afternoon and delineating his
marks, I will be drawing from what is written in Holy Scripture
and what can be found in the Sacred Tradition of the Church.
The best overall description of the Antichrist is given by St. Paul,
in his second letter to the Christians of Thessalonica, in Chapter
Two. This is what Paul said:
"Now, concerning the coming of Our Lord Jesus Christ and our
assembling to meet Him, that day will not come until the Apostacy
"Apostasy" is a Greek word that means a rebellion
against Christ, a rejection of Christ, what we might call today
"the death of God," complete rejection of God, rejection of His
rights over us, over our government, over our social life. And we
are seeing this apostasy not only here in our beloved America,
we're seeing it as an organized, formal revolt of Marxism, against
Almighty God and His rights over the world. And the reason
these people want to KILL GOD, the reason these people are
proclaiming the "death of God," is so they can take God's place!
So Paul continues:
"That day will not come until the Apostasy comes first, and the
man of sin is revealed. The son of hell (Paul calls him) who will
exault himself above every so-called god or object of worship,
so that he takes his seat in the Temple of God, proclaiming
himself to be God. Do you not remember (Paul wrote), that when
I was still with you I told you this, and you know, what is
restraining him now."
Paul didn't mention it in his letter, but we know what that
obstacle is, from Sacred Tradition, about which Paul was
speaking, that would restrain the reign of the Antichrist.
So Paul says:
"You know what is restraining him now, so that he may be revealed
in his own time, for the hidden power of sin is already at work,
but he who now restrains him can do so only until he is removed,
and then the lawless one will be revealed. The coming of this
lawless one will be by the working of satan, by all power by
pretended signs and wonders."
That is why we must be so careful today! Especially by reported
apparitions that have not been approved by the Magisterium. Our
Lord warned us in Matthew's Gospel that the devil will work such
great signs and wonders so as to deceive EVEN THE ELECT,
and lead them astray.
"With all power and pretended signs and wonders and with all
wicked deception of those who are to perish, because they
refuse to love the truth and be saved. Therefore, God will send
upon them a strong delusion, to make them believe what is false,
so that they may be condemned, who did not believe the truth,
but took pleasure in sinful living."
The reign of the Antichrist is a punishment from God, upon a
sinful and rebellious mankind, because mankind did not
worship his creator, because mankind is not greatful to almighty
God for all His benefactions, because mankind is refusing to
SERVE God, his punishment will be, that he must now serve the
devil! -and the devil's vicar on earth, the Antichrist himself.
The restraining obstacle which previously held back the reign
of the Antichrist, according to Sacred Tradition, was the Gentile
occupation of Israel and the holy city of Jerusalem. The
Antichrist will become the supreme ruler of Israel, the state
of Israel. This is what that acronym, or that number "666" means,
that stands for the king, the ruler of the state of Israel. Well, so
long as Palestine and the city of Jerusalem were in Gentile
control, it would be impossible for the Antichrist to be hailed
as the King of Israel. Indeed, it is the unanimous teaching of
Sacred Tradition, the Fathers of the Church, that the Antichrist
will be accepted as the "long-awaited Messiah" by the Jewish
people. And Our Lord warned them in the Fifth Chapter of
John's Gospel, I came in my Father's name, and you did not
receive me. But another will come in his own name, and him
you will receive.
Yes, because they rejected the true Messiah, they must now
accept the false messiah, the Antichrist, as their savior. That
is why it was impossible for the Antichrist to appear before
1967, when the Jews re-captured the holy city of Jerusalem.
Indeed, it began in 1946, when they recovered part of the
Holy Land and set up the new state of Israel, in 1946, and
that's why a year later in his Easter message, Pope Pius XII
said that the reign of the Antichrist could begin at any
The Antichrist will suddenly make his appearance, on the
world scene, emerging out of seeming obscurity. Once again,
satan who is the ape of God, will have his Antichrist be the
ape of the true Christ. Just as Our Lord had his hidden life for
30 years in Nazareth, before he began his ministry, so the
Antichrist will be hidden, and seemingly obscure, the early
part of his life, and then, like the true Christ, he will suddenly
appear on the world scene.
The Antichrist will be a man of unsurpassed ability. He will
emerge as a great world leader -- not by the sword, not by
military means, but by diplomacy, by the eloqunce of his
speech. He will be a man of brilliant intelligence, having
a solution to every human problem. He will have a
mesmerizing eloquence that will stir vast crowds of people,
bring them to their feet cheering, begging him to become
the ruler of the world.
[In no small way, Obama fits in this description due to his
inexplicable appeal to the voters of America -- why would
anyone vote for this guy? But they did. Why would they
be impressed with his speeches? But they were. Obama
managed to speak from a teleprompter but that did not
disturb the stupid voting public in this country. And so we
are being showed how the Antichrist will be able to sway
vast throngs of people worldwide, just as Obama has made
his appeal acceptable to so many today. Obama is a TYPE
OF the Antichrist. He is given to us so as to WEAR OUT our
sense of how ridiculous the Antichrist's contradiction of
Our Lord will be, eventually. We are being CONDITIONED
to scoff at and to disregard the reasonable warnings of
Catholic Tradition regarding the Antichrist.]
An excellent example was the mini antichrist, Adolf Hitler.
Few people realize that Adolf Hitler came to power through
the ballot box. His Nazi party received the majority vote in
a parliamentary election. And therefore Hitler, who was the
head of the party, was appointed the Chancellor of Germany,
by President Hindenburg. Then Hitler proceeded to take over
Austria, he took over Czechoslovakia, he united Romania and
Italy in his Axis powers.
Why will Antichrist be such a brilliant individual? Because
the Bible and the Fathers tell us, he will be totally and perfectly
possessed by Lucifer himself. The Antichrist will actually be
[Fr. means to say he will ACT AS] the person of Lucifer: it will
be a KIND of (re-incar...) incarnation on his part. It won't be a
TRUE incarnation. This requires a divine power: only God can
become truly incarnate. But Lucifer will so possess the body
and soul and faculties of this human being, that the human
person will be totally suppressed, in a state of complete
unconsciousness, and it will be Lucifer, walking on this earth;
the lips that move will be human, but the voice speaking will be
that of Lucifer himself. And he will come upon this earth, finally,
to reign over men, demanding that all bow down and worship
him as God.
Again, we have an example in Adolf Hitler, who as a young
man in Vienna, made a pact with the devil, to become the
master of the world. Adolf Hitler was possessed. This is a
matter of historical record. This is why an individual of such
mediocre talents -- he was a paperhanger; he made his living
by drawing postcards and selling them to tourists in Vienna,
and yet he became the master of practically all of Europe, a
man of mesmerizing eloquence. He hypnotized vast throngs
of party members, who after each speech would jump to their
feet, shouting and yelling, "Heil, Hitler, heil Hitler!" Well, that
was the demon who had possessed Hitler, and was ruling
Adolf Hitler made his officers in his SS take an oath to Lucifer.
You know when our officers liberated Europe and they opened
up the gates to these extermination camps, they couldn't
believe it. They simply could not believe how human beings
could be so cruel, could commit such atrocities. Well, they
weren't human beings! They were devils, in total possession
of Hitler and his SS, who were capable of such viciousness
and brutality. Well, when the Antichrist comes, he too
will be possessed by Satan, and so will most of his minions.
Naziism was a preview of coming attractions, of what the
reign of the Antichrist will be like.
[Demonic] possession is not at all like that movie, "The
Antichrist" [Fr. O'Connor means "The Exorcist."] That was
hyped-up and glamorized by Hollywood. They wanted to
make a horror picture, and I'm personally convinced that
Lucifer is already the chairman of the board in Hollywood!
He's the one who's calling the shots there today. And so,
perhaps he wanted this hyped-up, sensationalized movie,
to deceive people, about what possession is really like.
It's not like that at all ----[recording skips unknown amount
of time, camera angle changes]. 33:20
----Who also was possessed. And this priest, in
following the spirituality of the divine milieu, the
phenomenon of man, this poor priest got himself possessed,
under the control of a demon, and was TOTALLY unaware of
it. And the irony of the situation was, that the priest who
was appointed by the bishop to exorcise him was ALSO
possessed! And he didn't know it, either! And he had
been his professor in the seminary, the exorcist, and who had
introduced this young priest into Teilhard de Chardin.
And through following his spirituality and his ideas (Chardin's)
even the exorcist discovered that he had fallen under the
mind control of satan.
There are various degrees of possession. It doesn't take
place all at once. It begins with Ouija board, or Tarot cards
or fortune tellers, or, it begins with Astrology. That's when we
first open the door to satan in our lives.
He (satan) avoids this bizarre behavior that we saw in the movie,
"The Exorcist" [not 'the Antichrist', as Fr. said previously],
because he doesn't want people to know he's there! He
doesn't want even his victim to discover that he is gradually
taking over his or her life. He knows that the first thing they'll
do is go call an exorcist, and that's the LAST person in the
world he wants to see! And there are various degrees of
possession, until you reach that perfect degree, we saw in
the instance of Adolf Hitler, where a demon is able to
imitate perfectly the personality of his human victim, whose
own consciousness is completely suppressed.
And according to Marylin Furgesson in her book on the
NewAge movement, The Aquarian Conspiracy, and of course,
according to your own Mrs. Constance Comby here in Detroit,
there are far more people possessed today than we realize.
All these new methods of meditation, "Eastern spirituality,"
are really short courses in how to get yourself possessed!
Transcendental Meditation, EST - Erhardt Seminar [Sensitivity]
Training, Silva Mind Control, biofeedback, Yoga, stress-
management programs techniques, NewAge sprituality, the
mind sciences, anchor holes, which is being introduced as
a form of spirituality among Catholics, A Course in Miracles
-- all of these, are methods to get one's self under the control
of a demon.
Silva Mind Control -- I can speak from experience. I started to
take his program. I was talked into it by another priest. They
don't tell you from the beginning, that eventually they're
going to have you communicating with higher intelligences
from 'outer space'.
This is all part of the Occult: you're not told in the beginning
what you're getting into, until finally you reach a point, I'm
afraid, where it's too late. Well, one weekend of that, and I got
as far away from those people as I could get!
Fr. Matthew Fox, a Dominican, has established out in California
his Center for Creation, "Centered Spirituality." This is simply
another technique to get one's self possessed. This is why
he brings in people like Star Hawk, a registered witch! -to
teach in his program. It's basically a reversion to paganism,
a nature worship, a worship of creation, and that is the very
trap into which Teilhard de Chardin himself fell.
37:11 [scene from pews and windows]
According to a recent Gallup poll, at least 10 million
Americans have dabbled in this Eastern mysticism, and are
in some degree, in diabolical possession.
[It seems what Fr. means is that the poll says 10 million have
dabbled in Eastern mysticism; and then it is his assessment
of this poll that therefore those people are in some small
degree, or perhaps greater degree, in diabolical possession.]
Well, these are the "shock troops," the advance troops of the
Antichrist, who will be marshalled under his flag, when he
unleashes his reign of terror on the earth.
The Bible tells us that the Antichrist will have complete
control of all the real wealth of the earth. Daniel Chapter
Twelve tells us that he shall have control of the riches of
gold and silver. I'm sure there's some here this afternoon
who can remember when we had gold and silver coins.
That's real money, because it has a real, intrinsic value.
I remember when I was a youngster, even a dollar bill;
sometimes I would receive one for a birthday, as you can
imagine -- as a youngster, I would examine it very carefully.
I would always notice it used to say, "redeemable in silver
from the United States Treasury." [Actually it says, Payable
to the bearer on demand in silver.]
But if you examine a dollar bill lately, you will notice it no
longer says that. Instead, it's called a Federal Reserve Note.
All real money was taken from us, at least the gold, in 1932
by Franklin Delano Rosavelt, and our silver was taken from
us by [Richard Milhaus] Nixon in 1971. And in it's place was
issued this paper money, which has no intrinsic value [it is
actually a Non-Negotiable Note of Debt]. As it itself says, it
is a Federal Reserve Note, and a 'note' is legal jargon for an
I.O.U. [I owe you]. It's really just a piece of paper. No, all
real wealth has been taken from the American people, and
concentrated in the hands of the minions of the Antichrist.
They say even our gold at Fort Knox is no longer there. It's
all been assembled in deep vaults in Geneva, Switzerland.
So just what is this piece of paper worth? It's not worth
silver anymore. It's not worth gold. Well, it's worth whatever
the Federal Reserve says it's worth. By printing more of them,
as they did during the presidency of Jimmy Carter [and they
are doing once again under Obama!], they decreased its
value. The more dollars there were, the less each was worth.
Or, they can print less of them, they can constrict the money
supply. They can call these in on loans. And then they can
cause a Depression.
Mr. Alan Greenspan who presently is the chairman of the
Federal Reserve Board (this is 1987), he wrote an article in
1958, and he said that the Federal Reserve manipulation of
the currency in the 1920's is what brought on the stock
market crash of 1929. And, Mr. Greenspan says, "caused"
the American economy to collapse. All the Fed has to do, is
to call in its loans (holding up a dollar bill), and limit the
money supply. Well, this is when brokers then have to call
in loans that they've made to their clients. This is when
clients have to go out and sell their watches, or cars, or rings,
or whatever they can, to pay off the brokers. And this causes
a chain reaction in a nation, and this is what brought about
the great crash of 1929 and the Great Depression of the
1930's. Our lives, our fortunes and our honor today are at the
mercy of the Federal Reserve Board [which is a private
corporation, and is not "federal" and has no "reserve"].
And I suppose most of you think it's just another government
agency. The Federal Reserve system is no more part of
our federal government than is Federal Express, the overnight
package delivery people, or the Federal Dry Cleaners. The
Federal Reserve system is a private corporation owned by
private individuals. It is a secret corporation. It is so secret,
it is the only corporation in America that does not have
to publish the names of its principal stockholders. Every
other business corporation in our nation has to have on file
a list of its principal stockholders that are open to public
inspection. The only private corporation that doesn't have to
do this is the Federal Reserve system, so we don't even know
who owns it. It's the most secret, mysterious corporation
in America. And it's probably owned by the international
bankers: by the Rothchilds and the Warburgs and the other
international bankers, to whom we American taxpayers
owe the National Debt!
You know, sometimes the press will tell us, "Don't worry
about the National debt, we owe it to ourselves!" Well, if
we owe that national debt to ourselves, why do we have
to pay $100 billion a year in interest on it? No, that national
debt is owned by international bankers. And this is how
the Antichrist will gain control of the world.
As Myre Anchill (?) the founder of the Rothchild banking
dynasty said, "I don't care who makes your laws. Just let me
print your money." Because he who prints the money controls
the economy, controls the nation, and even controls the
Congress that makes the laws.
The Federal Reserve system is so secret you cannot even audit
it. Now, every corporation in America is open to audit by the
federal government. In 1978 a Congressman introduced a
law in Congress to audit the Federal Reserve -- it's never been
audited. And he wanted to find out what they're doing with all
our money, and why they've imposed this tremendous debt on
the American people. By the time that law got through Congress
and was passed, it said just the opposite: the Federal Reserve
may NOT be audited! That tells you the control that the
Federal Reserve has over our Congress, that it can take a law
introduced by a Congressman, and make it come through [saying]
exactly opposite of what was intended!
The Federal Reserve is part of that great deception of which
St. Paul spoke in his letter to the Thessalonians, in other words,
it's a central bank that controls all the other banks in our
country. And did you know that a central bank is the third
plank of the Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx in 1848,
nearly 150 years ago [now it's 165 years ago!]? If you have
never read the Communist Manifesto, I urge you to go to a large
public library and get a copy. You're in for the shock of your
The first plank of the Communist Manifesto is a Federal
Income Tax. Karl Marx was the first to propose a federal
income tax on all wage earners in a country. The second
plank is to substitute paper money for real money of gold and
silver. Everything that Karl Marx laid down for the economic
enslavement of a nation is already in place, right here in
America. Including women's liberation, the destruction of
marriage and family life for the sake of so-called 'women's
liberation' -- even this is spelled out by Karl Marx.
So where is the reign of the Antichrist in the world today?
Well, it's in Russia! -where you have the economic
enslavement of an entire people. It's in China! -where these
people are nothing but slave laborers for the Communist
Party. The reign of the Antichrist is in Cambodia! -where
3 million Cambodians were slaughtered by their own
government. It's in VietNam! It's in Laos! It's in Poland!
Yugoslavia! Czechoslovakia! And right here, in the United
States. We are under the Communist Manifesto already.
And this is what Daniel warned us about. He said most
people would be totally unaware that they were being taken
over by the Antichrist.
When did our beloved America fall under the control of the
Antichrist? We know the exact date: January 23rd, 1973,
when our Supreme Court enacted the death penalty against
20 million babies in our contry by abortion [it's now over 60
million]. This was a sign that we have fallen under the
control of the Antichrist. Whenever the devil gets control
of a nation -- and I don't care WHERE it is -- he demands
human sacrifice! That is the price, that those who give
themselves to the devil must pay!
Now, normally in the past, this human sacrifice was paid
by war, by revolution, by murder, by crime. Well, the most
scientific form of human sacrifice today is by abortion,
where a mother's womb becomes the altar on which a
human life is sacrificed to Lucifer. According to [Alexander]
Solzhenitsyn, the Communists have already killed 66
million of their own people in Russia, either through war,
execution, or slave labor camps. That is the price that the
Communists paid to Lucifer, and to his Antichrist.
[I know young people today who have never heard the name
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and when I try to tell them something
about him, they look at me like I'm from outer space. Such
language appears to them as if it is not comprehensible. And
this is the accomplishment of our public school system in
America. Perhaps it's not this bad in Ireland or in the
Phillipines, for example.]
So where is the reign of the Antichrist today?
Well, practically two-thirds of our planet has already been
subjected to his power and authority, and as far as the
rest of the world goes, it is just a matter of time. The
world bank will see to it, that every other nation is
brought to its knees, through inflation, through a huge
national debt, everybody will be enslaved to this world
bank, whose chief executive is the Antichrist.
The Bible and Tradition also warn us that the agents of the
Antichrist will infiltrate the Catholic Church, and will take
over its visible structures. I am afraid this is what we are
seeing today, not only in America but throughout the world.
The Antichrist will take over our schools and will use them
to teach Modernism, which is the religion of the Antichrist,
he will take over our colleges, our once-great Catholic
colleges, he will infiltrate and take over our chancery
offices, our parish offices, our United States Catholic
Conferences and the like.
[Curiously, he took over at Vat.II as well, and this priest, Fr.
O'Connor. in giving this talk on this subject and did not
recognize how Vat.II was under the control of the Antichrist!]
This is described by St. John in the Apocalypse Chapter
Twelve: the woman clothed with the sun, and the red
dragon -- who drives the Church underground, who
persecutes the Church! And then in the folowing Chapter
Thirteen, John warns us of this false prophet, who will arise.
And all the Fathers of the Church tell us the false prophet will
be a Catholic Bishop! -an apostate bishop, who will join the
Antichrist, and help him in his rule over Catholics!
This has happened many times in history. The Jewish
church was taken over by satan. At the time of Christ, he
had complete control of the Sanhedrin and the Scribes and
Pharisees. And he used those very leaders of the chosen
people, who should have LED THEM to Christ, he used those
leaders to execute their Messiah.
A prime example would be in England, under Henry VIII and
Archbishop Cranmer, where they literally stole the Catholic
Church away from the See of Peter. If you've ever gone to
England, I'm sure you've gone to Westminster Cathedral,
York Cathedral, to those other magnificent churches there,
they were once all Catholic, as Catholic as this church here!
[Fr. refers to a NovusOrdo parish church where the Newmass
only had been celebrated for the past 18 years already! How
ironic is THAT? The abominable Newmass had been imposed
not from the outside but from the inside of the Church, when
the Canonized Traditional Latin Mass was STOLEN from the
faithful who would have kept it.]
And they were all STOLEN by Henry VIII and Archbishop
Cranmer when they broke away, when 95% of Catholics went
right along with that mini-antichrist!
[Fr. speaks to an audience probably about 95% of whom had
then gone "right along" with the Newmass without question,
and he himself is perhaps 95% committed to it as well -- did
Fr. John O'Connor ever celebrate the CTLM during the time of
or after this speech he gave in 1987, which was BTW the
year before ABL consecrated his 4 bishops?]
All of the clergy, all of the priests, threw in with that mini-
antichrist, and every bishop in England, except one, John
Fisher, who was beheaded, threw in and joined with that
Antichrist in stealing the Church from the Vicar of Christ.
Well, how will his minions take over the Church? By
infiltration! This is their battle cry: If you can't beat 'em,
join 'em! We have been infiltrated by Masons for, well, ever
since their founding over 200 years ago.
This is why our once-beautiful liturgy has been so watered-
down. Archbishop Bugnini was a Mason --(and I had this on
the best authority)-- who had infiltrated the Congregation for
the Divine Worship, and did everything in his power to
obscure the Mass as a Sacrifice, and to turn it into a
Protestant communion service.
Now, our Mass, and our new liturgy IS VALID. If said by a
validly orained priest with the right intention, it's still valid.
[This was then, of course, 17 years after the form of ordination
had been rendered at least questionable, and 17 years after
the Newmass had not been promulgated, even while all the
clergy like Fr. O'Connor (who were not privy to the wiles of
the top levels of authority from whence corruption came)
had been and continued to be under the impression that the
Newmass had been promulgated. Therefore there are at
least two conspicuous deceptions here that Fr. O'Connor
has entirely missed: 1) Vat.II was under the control of
satan even while it seemed to be an authentic Council of
the Church, and 2) the Newmass was never promulgated
even though THEY SAID IT WAS, but all the documentation
reveals clearly that it in fact was not promulgated at all.]
But Bugnini did everything he could to obscure the Mass as
a sacrifice and to present it as simply a meal, a protestant
communion service. And just a few months ago, I was
attending a workshop with Bishop Jerome Asrich (?) of Texas,
and he got up and he said, and I quote, and he gave me
permission to quote him, he said the ICEL, the International
Commission on English in the Liturgy, is trying to protestantize
our Catholic Mass, unquote. You know, they've got a new
sacramentary, a new Missal in the works, and I'm sure that
when that does appear -- they promise it before the end of
the century -- they will do away completely with the Mass
as a sacrifice. Oh, they'll keep a lot of the vestments and
a lot of the external accoutrements..
[Uh, no, they'll start wearing Mexican sarapes and rainbow
towels and Hindu and Mohammedan prayer shawls and stuff,
and they'll get rid of the statues and the candles and the
stained glass windows, all in due time, before you know it.
But as for this "new Sacramentary," it was SORT OF brought
in over time, but not completely, perhaps thanks to this
speech by Fr. O'Connor and maybe others like it. But there
are further changes on the horizon, including but not limited
to the SO-CALED 'NEW 1962 MISSAL' that was supposed to
be introduced one year ago, for Advent 2012, but for
whatever reason it was not. So there is something new
coming still, even if it is now 12 years after the end of the
century. Note: the century to which Fr. refers, the 20th,
ended on December 31st, 2000, and the first day of the
new century was January 1st, 2001. It will have been 13
years at the end of next month, Dec. 2013. Right now, it
has only been 12 years.]
.. They'll try to PRETEND it's still the good-old-Catholic Mass,
but it will be nothing more than a protestant communion
[While Fr. has it partially correct, it is ever more obvious to
us today that the NovusOrdo Newmass which he curiously
attempts to defend, has been no more than a protestant
communion service pretty much all along, ever since 1969
when six Protestant ministers composed it for the most
regrettable Paul VI, who never promulgated it.]
And as Daniel, the great prophet Daniel in the Old
Testament warned, the Antichrist will do away with the
everlasting Sacrifice. This will be the mark of the Beast by
which we will recognize him. He will do away with the
Mass as a sacrifice of Christ on Calvary and substitute in its
place a protestant communion service.
[Actually, this being only 27 years after his speech, there are
many protestant groups who use the NovusOrdo liturgy just
about as Fr. O'Connor was saying it the day he gave this talk.]